This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Boffy b (talk | contribs) at 18:39, 17 December 2004 (Image copyright). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:39, 17 December 2004 by Boffy b (talk | contribs) (Image copyright)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
If you would like to talk to me, do it on this page. The easiest way to do it is to click the "+" button. "pwn" as a mainstream termIn Internet slang, you have re-instated "pwn" as a mainstream term for total domination. I have never gotten into a revert war, and I'm not going to now over something as inconsequential as this, but can you explain why you think this could possibly be described as mainstream usage? PhilHibbs 08:34, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC) Image:Fitting-expansion-card.JPGHi. Please remove Image:Fitting-expansion-card.JPG from related articles before tagging it for deletion. Images should not be tagged for deletion if they are still used in an article. - Tεxτurε 15:26, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC) Same for the other images you have tagged for deletion. They are still used by articles. - Tεxτurε 15:28, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC) demosoftware.netHi. Nice layout! Could you explain this edit? Thanks, chocolateboy 09:06, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC) GithyankiI added a VFD rather than a speedy delete request on purpose: Talk:Githyanki Collaboration of the WeekYour vote for African art has helped bring about the article's selection as this week's Collaboration of the week. Please join in trying to make the article a feature. Article LicensingHi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Misplaced Pages's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
OR
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. – Ram-Man ] 14:10, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC) PeugeotNorm, I dislike the appearance of your Peugeot pic arrangement. I think an article that starts with the pics strung right across the page is ugly. Much better, in my opinion, to have the pics down the right hand side as usual, particularly when more get added. What happens when, say, four more are added. Do we then have a solid block of pics clogging up the start of the article? I don't feel strongly enough to revert you but I thought you'd like to know my feelings - Adrian Pingstone 16:06, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Whoa!!!!!Hey! Sorry Dude! I didnt think this would affect the whole site! Sorry about the mess, are you sure you can put it back the way it was? -XJ Marking image thumbnails as speedy deletesWhen marking an image thumbnail as a speedy delete, could you include a link to image it is a thumb of? Thue | talk 14:56, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC) Image copyrightIt seems User:Dbenbenn has beaten me to it, there's now a GFDL tag on the image Boffy b 18:39, 2004 Dec 17 (UTC) |
