User talk:Chesdovi - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TheronJ (talk | contribs) at 14:47, 20 November 2006 (Third holiest site suggestion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 14:47, 20 November 2006 by TheronJ (talk | contribs) (Third holiest site suggestion)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Bruchim Haboim

Welcome!

Hello, Chesdovi, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Come join us at WP:ORBCW. - CrazyRussian talk/email 11:25, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Tiferesyisrael48.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tiferesyisrael48.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Misplaced Pages articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 15:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Jospeh Karo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jospeh Karo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: "Rivial claims" section of Al-Aqsa Mosque article

I am writing in an advocacy capacity for User:Thestick's concerns with the "Rival claims" section of this article. I respectfully request you to provide a statement here User:Amerique/AMA as to how you feel this this section fits within WP:NPOV, WP:VERIFY and WP:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox. Our aim is to resolve this dispute civilly and entirely within the bounds of WP:FAITH. I appreciate your time. Thank you, --Amerique 04:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Almorso has added a statement to the page above. Please consider adding a statement so we can try to resolve this situation without taking it further up the WP:DR process. Thank you,--Amerique 04:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Even Hashtiya

Your recent additions to the article were magnificent.... btw I wondered if you saw the recent "development" with Uri Ariel ? Amoruso 14:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Your help is badly needed to improve the article Moriah. Amoruso 05:42, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Questionable

I am glad you like it, you may be happy to know it is not yet complete. I have only used half of the material on the source so far. --Shamir1 21:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Temple Mount - recent events

Could you just give the reason why it was deleted? Thanks! Chesdovi 11:27, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry - I thought I was making a much smaller edit, but was mistakenly editting an earlier version of the page. I have put everything back. --Eliyak T·C 23:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

if someone changes links

It's possible simply to go back to an early version and copy paste the original links, n'est pas? Amoruso 19:12, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edit in 1929 Hebron massacre

Hi Dovid, I am wondering whether it was your intention to leave JAZ link and Kaplan's story there . I tried to explain at talk why I do not believe they belong there. Thanks. ←Humus sapiens 03:36, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Third holiest site suggestion

Chesdovi, I think that you're correct that the article should stay, but wanted to offer what I hope you'll take as constructive criticism.

I think that accusing muslim editors of being biased because they are muslim won't help the argument, any more than the regular accusations against pro-Israel, pro-Catholic, etc., editors ever help. First, it just makes everyone mad, and it never convinces anyone. You can respond to editors on the merits of their arguments, and if you're right, you will usually win, but arguing that Second, it might be construed as a personal attack, which will be one strike against the "keep the article" side if this ever ends up in arbitration. Third, it's not, IMHO, really fair. Striver is the only "delete the article" editor with whom I have had much prior experience, but he/she is clearly not in some doctrinal lockstep - he voted to keep twice, then changed the second keep to a delete.
More specifically, I suggest that you delete this edit - it won't do any good, and it may end up further inflaming the debate.

Thanks, and let me know if I can help, TheronJ 14:47, 20 November 2006 (UTC)