This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Evrik (talk | contribs) at 21:31, 20 November 2006 (/Edit Warring*/). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:31, 20 November 2006 by Evrik (talk | contribs) (/Edit Warring*/)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Please leave me a message. I will normally respond on your talk page, so please sign your comments with ~~~~.
 | Lordkinbote is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 Archives |
|---|
|
Previous discussions, which have been archived: |
UP4141
Lordkinbote,
I thought it would amuse those reading about Raymond Loewy that, after designing so many locomotives in life, he happened to design another long after his death through UP's use of his Air Force One livery on UP4141.
It was not my intention to conduct a test nor to be destructive. I find it frustrating that I have not figured out how to contribute to the substance of articles because of my inability to understand the jargon, procedures, and etiquette involved. (For example, I do not know who you are, what your role is, or whether you will see this.) There must be a better way.
Bob Nelson lionelsoni@aol.com
- I've partially reverted the change now that I understand your intention; your entry seemed to indicate that the locomotive color scheme was applied after President Bush's death (which hasn't ocurred) as a hoax, rather than Loewy's, which it was. Unfortunately, this type of vandalism is seen all to frequently from anonymous IP's. May I suggest that you create a permanent account for yourself as it will help avoid such misunderstandings in the future?--Lord Kinbote 21:35, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Category placement
I noticed you put in a bunch of the USNS Mission XXX (AO-xx) articles. You had the class directory after the categories. For some reason that fouled up the alphabetic sorting on the category page. Anyway, I've fixed a few and will do the rest in a second, but wanted you to know that the only thing that goes below categories is a stub.--J Clear 02:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Transcontinental Railroad
Please do not revert my edits to Transcontinental railroad without providing a reason for your belifs. I am perfectly prepared to discuss the merits of the railroad you suggest is transcontinental in a rational fashion, and in my edit summary have given the reason why I edited the page. The Proffesor 20:22, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- I assume the previous edits you refer to were made under this anon IP address (86.10.51.14)? In the future I suggest that you discuss potentially controversial changes on an article's talk page first. As you have an established user account you may also want to take the time to sign in rather than posting anonymously. The edit summary "A railroad confined to California cannot be considered transcontinental" leads me to believe that you lack the proper background to delete material from the subject article in the first place: Santa Fe: Railroad Gateway to the West (Duke), San Diego & Arizona: The Impossible Railroad (Hanft), and Rails of the Silver Gate (Dodge) — just to name a few notable works on the subject — all refer to Spreckel's goal in constructing the SD&A as being to establish a direct transcontinental rail link to San Diego. I've expanded the text in the relevant articles to avoid similar confusion on the part of other readers, and in the hope of bringing this issue to a close.--Lord Kinbote 06:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
My user page
Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page before I even noticed it. Erechtheus 00:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
The others
It was not a test, The film is spanish to belive it or not is up to you.--87.218.133.252 10:48, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006
The September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 19:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
About the revert that I (wj32) made
The message that you left me, which is at User_talk:Wj32, was that I was experimenting with that page. But actually all I did was try revert the vandalism after Luna Satin had reverted the page. Then it decided to revert to the vandalised version. Sorry.
--wj32 04:59, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for defending my user page! :) Jacek Kendysz 13:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Hippolyte de Bouchard
If you have the time and inclination, I'd appreciate it if you would "weigh-in" on the current discussion at Talk:Hippolyte de Bouchard; it could use some objective, outside feedback. Regards, Lord Kinbote 22:57, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'll be glad to take a look. Thanks for asking!NorCalHistory 23:27, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Pirate Buchar
I'd love to know if your sources do consistently refer to Bouchard as Buchar (which sounds like the spanish-ization of the French surname, anyway). At least in Argentina, I've never heard something like that. Thanks in advance, User:Ejrrjs says What? 22:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Jones' work is the only one I know of to mention the nickname "Pirate Buchar"; tonight when I'm home I'll look to see if he cites his source on this. The most common descriptor is simply "pirate."--Lord Kinbote 23:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks! User:Ejrrjs says What? 23:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006
The October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Ohlone
Lordkinbote, thank you for your edits today. Be aware that several editors are actively making changes on this article. As of yet, research and re-write continues with completion expected in about one (1) year. You are invited to make comments on the talkpage. And please take a moment to note the section for new and future editors lableled Please Read. --meatclerk 04:50, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
California Gold Rush GA/FA status
GA status has been graciously granted to the California Gold Rush article, and if it would be possible, I'd like to tinker with the article for another week or so, and get some additional voices involved, before considering an FA application. In addition, San Francisco was just the FA, and I'm not sure another California-themed FAC would be a good idea quite so soon. Any thoughts?NorCalHistory 22:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- I've been keeping up with the development of the article on and off, I don't think much work will be required to make it an FAC. I'll try to give it a once-over this weekend. I also share your concerns about a nomination too close on the heels of the San Francisco article, there ought to be no "rush" on this one (pun intended).--Lord Kinbote 20:54, 17 November 2006
- Thanks - I look forward to your thoughts. I'm thinking to let the article continue to develop, and perhaps have the FA nomination around the beginning of December.NorCalHistory 21:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
La Placita
Let's resolve the issue on the talk page before any more changes are made. --evrik 19:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Mission Nuestra Señora Reina de los Angeles
I've registered my move oppose vote on this. Mdhennessey 20:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Edit Warring
Would you two please stop your edit warring. --evrik 21:31, 20 November 2006 (UTC)