Misplaced Pages

:Requested moves - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Evrik (talk | contribs) at 21:35, 20 November 2006 ([] []). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:35, 20 November 2006 by Evrik (talk | contribs) ([] [])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Requested moves is a process for requesting the retitling (moving) of an article, template, or project page on Misplaced Pages. For information on retitling files, categories, and other items, see § When not to use this page.

Before moving a page or requesting a move, please review the article titling policy and the guidelines on primary topics.

Any autoconfirmed user can move a page using the "Move" option in the editing toolbar; see how to move a page for more information. If you have no reason to expect a dispute concerning a move, be bold and move the page. However, it may not always be possible or desirable to do this:

  • Technical reasons may prevent a move; for example, a page may already exist at the target title and require deletion, or the page may be protected from moves. In such cases, see § Requesting technical moves.
  • Requests to revert recent, undiscussed, controversial moves may be made at WP:RM/TR. If the new name has not become the stable title, the undiscussed move will be reverted. If the new name has become the stable title, a requested move will be needed to determine the article's proper location.
  • A title may be disputed, and discussion may be necessary to reach consensus: see § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. The requested moves process is not mandatory, and sometimes an informal discussion at the article's talk page can help reach consensus.
  • A page should not be moved and a new move discussion should not be opened when there is already an open move request on a talk page. Instead, please participate in the open discussion.
  • Unregistered and new (not yet autoconfirmed) users are unable to move pages.

Requests are typically processed after seven days. If consensus supports the move at or after this time, a reviewer will perform it. If there is a consensus not to move the page, the request will be closed as "not moved." When consensus remains unclear, the request may be relisted to allow more time, or closed as "no consensus". See Misplaced Pages:Requested moves/Closing instructions for more details on the process.

Misplaced Pages:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a move request as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of the move discussion to determine whether or not the contested close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines.

When not to use this page

Shortcuts

Separate processes exist for moving certain types of pages, and for changes other than page moves:

Undiscussed moves

Shortcuts

Autoconfirmed editors may move a page without discussion if all of the following apply:

  • No article exists at the new target title;
  • There has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title; and
  • It seems unlikely that anyone would reasonably disagree with the move.

If you disagree with a prior bold move, and the new title has not been in place for a long time, you may revert the move yourself. If you cannot revert the move for technical reasons, then you may request a technical move.

Move wars are disruptive, so if you make a bold move and it is reverted, do not make the move again. Instead, follow the procedures laid out in § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves.

Uncontroversial proposals

Only list here proposals that are clearly uncontroversial but require administrator help to complete. Things like capitalization and spelling mistakes would be appropriate here. If there is any prior discussion as to the name of the article please link to it. If there is any doubt as to whether a page move could be opposed by anyone, do not list it in this section.

Please use {{subst:WP:RM2|Old Page Name|Requested name|Reason for move}} in this section only; do not copy, paste, and edit previous entries. No dated sections are necessary, and no templates on the article's talk page are necessary.

If your request was not fulfilled, and was removed from this section, please relist it in the other proposals section below.


Other proposals

Make sure that all of the proposals listed below have a discussion set up on talk page of the article to be moved. Please use the template {{subst:Misplaced Pages:RM}} and, if necessary, create a new dated section.

Please use the correct template: see the instructions above. Do NOT attempt to copy and paste formatting from another listing.

20 November 2006

19 November 2006

18 November 2006

These three episodes are the only lost episodes which do not fit with the current naming convention at WP:TV-NC ("For an article created about a single episode, add the series name in parentheses only if there are other articles by the same name") These episode articles need no disambiguation "disambiguation in Misplaced Pages and other Wikimedia Foundation projects is the process of resolving ambiguity" (from WP:D) as there is no ambiguity here. —`/aksha 03:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

17 November 2006

  • Yefim BogolyubovEfim Bogoljubov —(Discuss)— or → Efim Bogoljubow. Revert move by Ezhiki with edit summary citing WP:RUS. (Note that the last edit before Ezhiki's move was Mibelz moving without discussion the last name from Bogoljubov to Bogoljubow, so the choice there has never been established either). That WP:RUS is irrelevant to the naming conventions, because Misplaced Pages isn't doing the Romanization. The subject of the article Romanized his own name, and that is what he is known by and that is what we should use. As even WP:RUS itself puts it, "When something has a conventional name in English, use that name instead of transliterating", so Ezhiki's move was not in accordance with WP:RUS as he/she claimed. (Efim wasn't originally Russian anyway, but Ukrainian, for all those people who like to argue about Ukrainian spellings vs. Russian spellings, and the cited page deals with Russian spellings.) This German, having moved to Germany in 1926, is best known in English under the Efim spelling he used, not Yefim. If it cannot be decided otherwise, toss a coin to decide between Bogolyubov and Bogolyubow, he is known under both spellings. —Gene Nygaard 17:09, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Pedra Branca, SingaporePulau Batu Puteh —(Discuss)— One: The ownership of the island Pedra Branca is contested between Malaysia and Singapore. Therefore, no country name should be placed at the name in spirit of WP:NPOV. Two: Previously, the page name was simply Pedra Branca. However, the page Pedra Branca needs disambiguity page since there are several other places that are named as Pedra Branca. The typical solutions for the two problems, if following through conventional way (ie. for one: simply pedra branca. For two: eliminates the current disambiguity page.) However, the solution of moving the page Pedra Branca, Singapore solves both problem as it does not require disambiguity page and eliminates the needs to place a country name in the spirit of NPOV. __earth 13:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Árpád Élő -- Revert a series of edits by Mibelz, most or all of them chess related, all made without discussion. The ones listed here are contrary to naming conventions standards. Many of these people have moved to English-speaking countries and are known for their history in chess competitions under the original article name, and many are also known as authors (especially of books about chess) of English-language books published under that name. In many Mibelz has also deliberately added incorrect sort keys which result in the articles being mis-sorted in categories. In the listing below, I have included some additional identifying information, with User:Mibelz edit summaries when making the move placed in quotation marks. --Gene Nygaard 09:15, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

16 November 2006

15 November 2006

Backlog

Move dated sections here after five days have passed.

14 November 2006

  • JDG-009X Devil GundamJDG-009X Dark Gundam —(Discuss)— This is a very peculiar case, IMHO. The original Japanese name of this Gundam is Devil (デビル, deberu), but it was never written in English as Devil Gundam. The official English name is Dark Gundam, as seen on Bandai's site. Google is not much help either, since "Devil Gundam" comes up with 11,100 hits, and "Dark Gundam" comes up with only 750 hits. But the official English name is still "Dark Gundam". I'm actually unsure myself which one this should be, because the Japanese name is based on an English word, but there's a different English word used for the official English name. Yes, it's confusing, and I'm sorry. —Wirbelwindヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 23:52, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
The move of this page to Pretenders to the kingdom of Portugual was not discussed in the first place. Charles 05:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Category: