This is an old revision of this page, as edited by VinceB (talk | contribs) at 02:15, 26 November 2006 (→PANONIAN). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:15, 26 November 2006 by VinceB (talk | contribs) (→PANONIAN)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)PANONIAN
- PANONIAN (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 212.200.175.214 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- 212.200.175.59 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- WhiteEagleSerbianPride (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 212.200.175.122 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- Code letters: A, E
Just see IP's contribs. We have a dispute about this. IP is Serbian, and simply reverting my contribs to PANONIAN's versions, several times this means the 4th revert to that version. Vince 15:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
It is more than obvious, even if the IP's does not match with PANONIAN, that they are sock- or meatpuppets of him, since it (they) simply continued the edit war, what PANONIAN started by reverting. No such "coincidences" happen. And I had some death sentences (15:42 & 15:59) immediately after I asked for this checkuser at 15:23. --Vince 16:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: As noted, WhiteEagleSerbianPride and the IP's have been announcing "death sentences" against editors. Recommend priority attention. Newyorkbrad 18:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
PANONIAN has apparently left wikipedia (). However, as there have been death threats, I think this checkuser should still be done. We need to know who is going around threatening to execute people. --Tango 22:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
{{Declined}}, only because we don't have an {{unnecessary}} template. 
Unnecessary. If the IPs are going around making death threats, block them until hell freezes over. If users are making death threats, ditto. If blocking the IPs doesn't stop the accounts, then come back here and ask us to block the IPs used by the accounts. Essjay (Talk) 00:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- First three (PANONIAN + 212.200.175.214 / 212.200.175.59) was edit warring with me, broke the 3RR (here: , , , , , , ), and it is obvious, that they are the same person in reality (for ex: same edit within' 30 min).
- Plus: 212.200.175.122 is in the same range as the other two IPs, and it had the same edit, as WhiteEagleSerbianPride (talk · contribs) - so I'm pretty sure, that all of these are the same, so this literally means, that PANONIAN was the one, who wrote death threats to me, so by yr logic he should be blocked indef. --Vince 01:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
I see PANONIAN's recent quit only a way (trick?) to avoid blocking. --Vince 01:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Category: