Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pengo (talk | contribs) at 23:58, 9 August 2019 (→Origins of the "Focus stacking" article: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Older archive: page 1 page 2 page 3 is the history of page 4. page 4 page 5, more

Nomination of CryptoKitties for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CryptoKitties is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/CryptoKitties until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 21:31, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pengo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Misplaced Pages account and associated email Change your password now if your Misplaced Pages account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:55, 4 May 2019 (UTC) Template:Z152

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC) Template:Z83

Origins of the "Focus stacking" article

I intend to improve the "Focus stacking" article. To do this I would like some background, if you can remember, where you found information for the original writeup of the article. Anything you can remember could be helpful. Also, I have a few questions...

1. Do you know of, or where I might find, reliable secondary sources that reference primary sources?
2. What other names for this topic were considered?
3. Why was it written as a "digital" process even though the title is more general?

I don't wish to burden you with a lot of work, so whatever you can recall would be helpful.
Thank you for your efforts.
NewageEd (talk) 04:17, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

@NewageEd: I created the article over 10 years ago and I don't remember much. From the commit comments, it appears it was based largely on a section from Depth of field. Perhaps there's bits of information gathered from various app websites too, but I'm not sure. In those earlier days of Misplaced Pages you could get away with creating a more stubby article without too many sources and just letting it grow.

Looking at the redirects to the page (which it looks like I made most of), other names could have been "Extended depth of field", "Stack focusing", "Extended depth-of-focus", "Extended depth of field images", and "Focus stacked ".

Adding information on an analogue/film process would be great. I only wrote about what I knew, could easily find, or what was my interest at the time—all of which would have pointed to the digital process. My hope when creating a new article is always that it can be improved beyond the scope of my knowledge and research so I wish you all the best in improving it. —Pengo 23:58, 9 August 2019 (UTC)