Misplaced Pages

User talk:Humus sapiens

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ParadoxTom (talk | contribs) at 03:25, 30 November 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 03:25, 30 November 2006 by ParadoxTom (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Humus sapiens is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
Home Talk List Tools Policy Cmmn Puzzle Ubx Nav
Welcome to my civilized talk page.
Archives
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
11, 12, 13, 14, 15,
...

Please scroll all the way down to append your message at the bottom or start a new topic.

?
  • Four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message would automagically sign and date it.
  • Unless asked otherwise, I may respond on your Talk page or on the Talk page of the specific article. If the dialog gets interesting, a link to the other half can be added here.
  • I believe that the best place for discussions about article's content is at that article's Talk page.
  • Please follow talk page guidelines and wikiquette.

Template:NotJudaism

You honestly feel that template should be kept?? Anything that is not Judaism can be linked to it. A tree...a bike....a sandwich. C'mon...be reasonable. MetsFan76 05:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

No need for a strawman. See Jews for Jesus, a Christian group that pretends that Christianity and Judaism are the same. ←Humus sapiens 05:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

But that is their belief and should be respected. But to actually have a NotJudaism template is ludicrous. People will link anything to it. MetsFan76 05:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Was this in response to my comment? (It's tabbed that way). -- tariqabjotu 05:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

If I may Humus- the template was at best redundant. Any article about Messianic Judaism that doesn't make clear in the initial introduction the fringe nature of what follows has issues. JoshuaZ 06:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
I hear you. ←Humus sapiens 06:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
The rest of this talk: . ←Humus sapiens 06:16, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

I was about to apologize right before you posted "the rest of this talk," but I see no need for it now. I had every right to my opinion as I found that template incredibly insulting. MetsFan76 06:19, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

 Oh, the humanity!

I had my doubts about a second RfA, but even I couldn't have predicted the way it caught fire and inexorably drifted to the ground in flames, causing quite a stir on its way down. Still, it was encouraging to see the level of support and confidence. Thank you for yours, and I hope I'll still have it the next time around. Kafziel 13:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Jews for Jesus Arbitration

There is a Request for Arbitration for the Jews for Jesus article. Please provide your inputs.ParadoxTom 03:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)