This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jacob Peters (talk | contribs) at 00:04, 1 December 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:04, 1 December 2006 by Jacob Peters (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)It has been suggested that Ukrainian Holocaust be merged into this article. (Discuss) |
The Soviet famine (1932-1933) resulted in notable demographic consequences in the USSR. Modern scholars argue that the famine was caused primarily by inevitable natural disasters which led to a series of poor harvests. .
Causes and outcomes
A policy of collectivization of agriculture was introduced. Agriculture in Ukraine was substantially affected, but contrary to some myths, it did not proportionally impact Ukraine the most. In Ukraine, in the beginning of 1932, 69% of households were collectivized compared to 83% in Lower Volga.
At the same time, the "Twenty-Five Thousanders", industrial workers, mostly devoted Bolsheviks, were sent to help run the farms. In addition, they were to fight the increasing passive and active resistance to collectivization by engaging in what was euphemistically referred to as "dekulakization": the arresting of 'kulaks' — allegedly well to do farmers who opposed the regime and withheld grain — and transferring kulak families to the Urals and Central Asia where they were to be placed in others sectors of the economy such as timber. It is documented that around 300,000 Ukrainians out of a population of about 30 million were subject to these policies in 1930-31. However, Ukrainians composed only 15% of the total 1.8 million relocated kulaks.
Collectivization proved to negatively affect agricultural output everywhere, but since Ukraine was the most productive area (over 50% of Imperial Russian wheat originated from Ukraine in the beginning of 20th century), the effects here were particularly dramatic.
As projections for agricultural production declined, so did collections by the state. For the 1932 harvest, it was planned that there would be 29.5 million tons in state collections of grain out of 90.7 million tons in production. But the actual result was a disastrous 55-60 million tons in production. The state ended up collecting only 18.5 million tons in grain. In fact, collections by the state were virtually the same in 1930 and 1931 at about 22.8 million tons. For 1932, they had significantly been reduced to 18.5 million tons. These were the total estimated outcomes of the grain harvests
Year | Production | Collections | Remainder | Collections as % of production |
---|---|---|---|---|
1930 | 73-77 | 22.1 | 51-55 | 30.2-28.7 |
1931 | 57-65 | 22.8 | 34-43 | 40-35.1 |
1932 | 55-60 | 18.5 | 36.5-41.5 | 33.6-30.8 |
1933 | 70-77 | 22.7 | 47.3-54.3 | 32.4-29.5 |
On August 7, 1932, the Soviet government passed a decree that would impose the death penalty in the USSR for any theft of public property . The scope of this law seemed wide, and included even the smallest appropriation of grain by peasants for personal use. However, it was not very firmly enforced and was substantially revised.
Politburo protocols reveal that secret decisions had later modified the original decree. On September 16, 1932, the Politburo approved a measure that specificially exempted small-scale theft of socialist property from the death penalty. It declared that "organizations and groupings destroying state, social, and cooperate property in an organized way by fires, explosions and mass destruction of property shall be sentenced to execution without weakening", and listed a number of cases in which "kulaks, former traders and other socially-alien persons" should suffer the death penalty. So-called "kulaks", whether members of a kolkhoz or not, who "organize or take part in the theft of kolkhos property and grain", should also be sentenced "to the death penalty without weakening." But "working individual peasants and collective farmers" who stole kolkhoz property and grain should be sentenced to ten years; the death penalty should be imposed only for "systematic theft of grain, sugar beet, animals, etc"
When it became clear that the 1932 grain deliveries were not going to meet the expectations of the government, the decreased agricultural output was blamed on the "kulaks", "nationalists", and "Petluravites". According to a report of the head of the Supreme Court, by January, 15, 1933 as many as 103,000 people had been sentenced under the provisions of the August 7 decree. Of the 79,000 whose sentences were known to the Supreme Court, 4,880 had been sentenced to death, 26,086 to ten years' imprisonment and 48,094 to other sentences. Those sentenced to death were categorised primarily as kulaks; many of those sentenced to ten years were individual peasants who were not kulaks.
A special commission headed by Vyacheslav Molotov was sent to Ukraine in order to execute the grain contingent. On November 9, a secret decree urged Bolshevik police and repression forces to increase their "effectiveness". Molotov also ordered that if no grain remained in Ukrainian villages, all beets, potatoes, vegetables and any other food were to be confiscated.
On December 6, a new regulation was issued that imposed the following sanctions on Ukrainian villages: ban on supply of any goods or food to the villages, requisition of any food or grain found on site, ban of any trade, and, lastly, the confiscation of all financial resources. Measures were undertaken to persecute upon the withholding or bargaining of grain. This was done frequently with the aid of 'shock brigades', which raided farms to collect grain. This was done regardless of whether the peasants retained enough grain to feed themselves, or whether they had enough seed left to plant the next harvest.
The famine mostly affected the rural population. In comparison to the previous famine in the USSR during 1921–22, which was caused by drought, and the next one in 1947, the famine of 1932-1933 in Ukraine was caused not by infrastructure breakdown, or war, but by deliberate political and administrative decisions (e.g., see ).
The result was disastrous. Within a few months, the Ukrainian countryside, one of the most fertile agricultural regions in the world, was the scene of a general famine. The Soviet government denied initial reports of the famine, and prevented foreign journalists from traveling in the region. Scholars who have conducted research in declassified archives have reported "the Politburo and regional Party committees insisted that immediate and decisive action be taken in response to the famine such that 'conscientious farmers' not suffer, while district Party committees were instructed to supply every child with milk and decreed that those who failed to mobilize resources to feed the hungry or denied hospitalization to famine victims be prosecuted."
At the same time, however, the Soviet regime provided some aid to famine-stricken regions, poorly limiting the impact of the famine. Between February and July 1933 at least thirty-five Politburo decisions and Sovnarkom decrees selectively authorized issue of a total of only 320,000 tons of grain for food for 30 million people.
Further evidence shows measures taken by the Soviet government to reduce famine. On April 6, 1933, Sholokhov, who lived in Vesenskii district, wrote at length to Stalin describing the famine conditions and urging him to provide grain. Stalin received the letter on April 15, and on April 16 the Politburo granted 700 tons of grain to the district. Stalin sent a telegram to Sholokhov "We will do everything required. Inform sieze of necessary help. State a figure." Sholkhov replied on the same day, and on April 22, the day on which Stalin received the second letter, Stalin scolded him, "You should have sent answer not by letter but by telegram. Time was wasted"
Grain exports during 1932-1933 continued, however, even though on a significantly lower level than in previous years. In 1930/31 there had been 5,832 thousand tons of grains exported. In 1931/32, grain exports declined to 4,786 thousand tons. In 1932/1933, grain exports were just 1,607 thousand tons and in 1933/34, this further declined to 1,441 thousand tons.
Poor weather played a substantial role in the famine according to revisionist scholars. Russia and parts of Ukraine suffered from fairly regular droughts, which significantly reduced crop yields. The fluctuations in the annual level of temperature and rainfall on the territory of the USSR are greater than in major grain-producing areas elsewhere in the world. The weather pattern is highly continental, and is complicated by the frequent and irregular dry winds which blow from Central Asia across the Volga region, North Caucuses, and Ukraine in the growing months of late spring and early sumer. Morever, the critical unsufficiency of humidity makes a large territory particularly susceptible to drought, resulting in high temperatures and low rainfall. The weather was largely responsible for the above-average yield over the whole five years 1909-13. In 1925-29 the weather was only slightly worse than average. But in 1930-34 the weather was poorer than usual over the five years, with particularly bad conditions in 1931 and 1932. This was a factor over which the Soviet government had no immediate control.
In 1925-29, the weather was favorable; the only break in the years of fine weather came in 1927. Then weather in 1930 was excellent. In 1931, however, this good luck came to an end. The spring weather was much colder than usual; and June was warmer, and July much hotter than usual. The cold spring and hot July were a deadly combination. The cold spring delayed the sowing and hence the whole development of grain. The grain reached its vulnerable flowering stage later than normal, coinciding with the hot July weather. And from June the southeast suffered what what is known as as a sukhovei (literally, dry wind). In May-July, the normal weather pattern in the Volga and Ukraine was that the warm, dry, southeasterly winds from Kazakhstan gave way to colder and wetter winds from the northwest. But about once in every ten or twelve years the southeasterlies predominated throughout these months, the winds became scorching, no rain fell, and the earth became parched. At these times, grain yields fell significantly and there was a risk of famine if reserve stocks of grain were not available. These dry winds brought famine in 1891 and 1921. In 1906, massive government assistance largely alleviated the problem. The drought, which had begun in West Siberia in May, spread to the Volga regions in June and July. A huge deficit in rainfall was accompanied by temperatures much higher than average in these regions as well as Ukraine.
For 1931, the spring sowing was considerably delayed. Virtually no sowing took place in March and in April it was delayed by nearly three weeks. The delay in Ukraine and Lower Volga was caused primarily by the unusually cold weather. In other areas, excessive rain also added to the problems and made it difficult to catch up. A report from the Lower Volga noted: "After a short improvement another rainy spell has begun. Mass sowing in the southern districts of the region is taking place in a struggle with the weather. Literally every hour and every day have to be grabbed for sowing." The people's commissar for agriculture stated that the delay of two-three weeks had been caused by the "very difficult meteorological and climatic conditions of the spring".
Natural calamities had descended on regions particularly the Central and Lower Volga in 1931. In August, the agricultural newspaper published numerous references to the exceptionally rainy weather which had delayed harvesting and damaged harvested grain which had not been stacked. It was later reported that in the Central Volga the burning of the ripening grain by the hot drought had been followed during the weeks of harvesting by enough rain for three harvests. On the right bank of the Volga, large quantities of wet grain had been spoiled. There were reports of warm, dry weather had set in from Mid-May 1931 and that exceptionally high temperatures were recorded in many parts of Ukraine, North Caucuses, Lower Volga, and Kazakhstan. For the USSR as a whole they were higher than average.
In Ukraine, the temperature was considerably lower during the whole of March 1932 than in the previous year. At the end of May and in early June temperatures were even higher than in 1931. Then there was a sudden change: high rainfall was experienced in most of the USSR, especially in the Kiev region. Temperatures were less severe than in 1931, but the combination of high temperatures in the initial flowering stage and great humidity during early flowering greatly increased the vulnerability of the crop.
Another major factor in the decline of the harvests were the shortage of draught power for ploughing and reaping was even more acute in 1932 than in the previous year. The number of working horses declined from 19.5 million on July 1, 1931 to 16.2 million on July 1, 1932. The desperate efforts to replace horses by tractors failed to compensate for this loss. In 1931, the total supply of tractors to agriculture amounted to 964,000 h.p., 393,000 produced at home, and 578,000 imported. But in 1932, because of the foreign trade crisis, no tractors at all were imported. In the whole of 1932, only 679,000 tractor horse-power were supplied to agriculture, considerably less than in 1931. Only about half became available in time for the harvest, and even less in time for the spring sowing. Animal draught power deteriorated in quality. Horses were fed and maintained even more inadequately than in the previous year. The acute shortage of horses led to the notorious decision to employ cows as working animals. On February 23, the Lower Volga party bureau decided to use 200,000 cows for special field work. The following shows the amount of horses in the USSR :
Year | All Horses(thousands) |
---|---|
1930 | 30237 |
1931 | 26247 |
1932 | 19368 |
1933 | 16579 |
1934 | 15664 |
To further prevent the spread of information about the famine, travel from Ukraine and some Don regions - was especifically forbidden by directives of January 22 1933 (signed by Molotov and Stalin) and of January 23 1933 (joint directive VKP(b) Central Committee and Sovnarkom). The directives stated that the travels "for bread" from these areas were organized by enemies of the Soviet power with the purpose of agitation in northern areas of the USSR against kolkhozes. Therefore railway tickets were to be sold only by ispolkom permits, and those who managed to travel northwards should be arrested.
Estimation of the loss of life
While the course of the events as well as their underlying reasons are still a matter of debate, the fact that by the end of 1933, millions of people had died from factors relating to malnutrition in the USSR is undisputed. The Soviet Union long objected to the reports of famine.
The Russian archives have shown that excess deaths in Ukraine numbered 1.54 million In 1932-1933, there were a combined 1.2 million cases of typhus and 500 thousand cases of typhoid fever. Deaths resulted primarily from manifold diseases due to lowered resistance and disease in general rather than actual starvation All major types of disease, apart from cancer, tend to increase during famine as a result of undernourishment resulting in lower resistance to disease, and of insanitary conditions. In the years 1932-34, the largest rate of increase was recorded for typhus. Typhus is spread by lice. In conditions of harvest failure and increased poverty, the number of lice is likely to increase, and the herding of refugees at railway stations, on trains and elsewhere facilitates their spread. In 1933, the number of recorded cases was twenty times the 1929 level, which was the lowest number of cases ever recorded in the Russian Empire and the USSR until that year. The number of cases per head of population recorded in Ukraine in 1933 was naturally considerably higher than in the USSR as a whole. But by June of 1933, incidence in Ukraine had increased to nearly ten times the January level and was higher than in the rest of hte USSR taken as a whole.
Year | Typhus | Typhoid Fever | Relapsing Fever | Smallpox | Malaria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1913 | 120 | 424 | 30 | 67 | 3600 |
1918-22 | 1300 | 293 | 639 | 106 | 2940
(average) |
1929 | 40 | 170 | 6 | 8 | 3000 |
1930 | 60 | 190 | 5 | 10 | 2700 |
1931 | 80 | 260 | 4 | 30 | 3200 |
1932 | 220 | 300 | 12 | 80 | 4500 |
1933 | 800 | 210 | 12 | 38 | 6500 |
1934 | 410 | 200 | 10 | 16 | 9477 |
1935 | 120 | 140 | 6 | 4 | 9924 |
1936 | 100 | 120 | 3 | .5 | 6500 |
Modern calculation that use demographic data including those available from formerly closed Soviet archives narrow demographic losses from rising deaths from falling births to about 3.2 million or, allowing for the lack of the data precision, 3 to 3.5 million. Of these 3 to 3.5 million "losses", 1.54 million were due to excess deaths. The following calculation is presented by Stanislav Kulchytsky. The declassified Soviet statistics show a decrease of 538 thousand people in the population of Soviet Ukraine between 1926 census (28,925,976) and 1937 census (28,388,000). The number of births and deaths (in thousands) according to the declassified records is:
Year | Births | Deaths | Natural change |
---|---|---|---|
1927 | 1184 | 523 | 662 |
1928 | 1139 | 496 | 643 |
1929 | 1081 | 539 | 542 |
1930 | 1023 | 536 | 485 |
1931 | 975 | 515 | 460 |
1932 | 982 | 668 | 114 |
1933 | 471 | 1850 | -1379 |
1934 | 571 | 483 | 88 |
1935 | 759 | 342 | 417 |
1936 | 895 | 361 | 534 |
According to the correction for officially non-accounted child mortality in 1933 by 150 thousand calculated by Serhiy Maksudov, the number of births for 1933 should be increased from 471 thousand to 621 thousand. Assuming the natural mortality rates in 1933 to be equal to the average annual mortality rate in 1927-1930 (524 thousand per year) a natural population growth for 1933 would have been 97 thousand, which is five times less than this number in the past years (1927-1930). A major hurdle in estimating the human losses due to famine is the needed to take into account the numbers involved in migration (including forced resettlement). According to the Soviet statistics, the migration balance for the population in Ukraine for 1927 - 1936 period was a loss of 1,343 thousand people.
According to estimates about 81.3% of the victims were ethnic Ukrainians, 4.5% Russians, 1.4% Jews and 1.1% were Poles. Also many Belarusians, Hungarians, Volga Germans and Crimea Tatars became victims of Holodomor.
Politicization of the famine
The famine is a politically charged topic and hence heated debates are likely to continue for a long time. Until around 1990, the debates were largely among the so called "denial camp" who refused to recognize the very existence of the famine or stated that it was caused by natural reasons (such as poor harvest), scholars who accepted reports of famine but saw it as a policy blunder followed by the botched relief effort, and scholars who alleged that it was intentional and specifically anti-Ukrainian or even an act of genocide against the Ukrainians as a nation.
Nowadays, most scholars tend to agree that the famine affected millions. While it is also accepted that the famine affected other nationalities, as well as Ukrainians, the debate is still ongoing whether the famine qualifies as the act of genocide. As far as the possible effect of the natural reasons, the debate is restricted to whether the poor harvest or post-traumatic stress, played any role at all and in what degree the Soviet actions were caused by the country's economic and military needs as viewed by the Soviet leadership.
Still, the famine issue is politicized within the framework of uneasy relations between Russia and Ukraine (and also between various regional and social groups within Ukraine). The anti-Russian factions in Ukraine have vested interest in advancing the interpretation that the Holodomor was a genocide, perpetrated by Russia-centric interests within the Soviet government. Russian political interests and their supporters in Ukraine have reasons to refute the deliberate character of the famine and play down its scale.
The Ukrainian communities are criticized for using the term Holodomor, Ukrainian Genocide, or even Ukrainian Holocaust, to appropriate the larger-scale tragedy of collectivization as their own national terror-famine, thus exploiting it for political purposes.
One typical charge argument is that the famine was preceded by an alleged onslaught on the Ukrainian national culture. Yet, they fail to take into consideration the comfortable status of the Ukrainian language in schools and the media. Indeed, Ukrainian culture was enriched due to Soviet policies.
An example of a late-era famine sceptic is Canadian journalist Douglas Tottle, author of Fraud, Famine and Fascism: The Ukrainian Genocide Myth from Hitler to Harvard (1987). Tottle asserts that while there were severe economic hardships in Ukraine, the idea of the famine was exaggerated as propaganda by Nazi Germany and William Randolph Hearst, to justify a German invasion.
On May 15, 2003, the Verkhovna Rada (parliament) of Ukraine passed a resolution declaring the famine of 1932–1933 an act of genocide, deliberately organized by the Soviet government against the Ukrainian nation. Governments and parliaments of several other countries have also officially recognized the Holodomor as an act of genocide.
Remembrance
This section needs expansion. You can help by making an edit requestadding to it . |
To honor those who perished in the Holodomor, monuments have been dedicated and public events held annually in Ukraine and worldwide. The fourth Saturday in November is the official day of remembrance for people who died as a result of Holodomor and political repressions.
In 2006, the day of remembrance is November 25th. President Viktor Yushchenko directed, in decree No. 868/2006, to observe a minute of silence at 4 o'clock in the afternoon on that Saturday. Flags in Ukraine should fly at half-mast as a sign of mourning. In addition, entertainment events are to be restricted and television-radio programming adjusted accordingly.
2006
29 October, 2006 - In Paris, about 2000 people honored the 72 anniversary of the artificial famine. Kateryna Yushchenko, politicians and diplomatic representatives attended the remembrance event of millions who died in the Holodomor.
18 November, 2006 - The annual commemorative observance of Ukraine's man-made famine took place at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City.
- A monument in the capital of Ukraine - Kiev A monument in the capital of Ukraine - Kiev
- "Light the candle" event at a Holodomor memorial in Kiev, Ukraine
- A memorial cross in Kharkiv, Ukraine
- A Holodomor memorial in Poltava Oblast, Ukraine A Holodomor memorial in Poltava Oblast, Ukraine
- A memorial in Winnipeg, Canada
- A Holodomor monument in Edmonton, Canada
- A memorial in Windsor, Ontario, Canada
- A Holodomor monument in Calgary, Canada
See also
Notes
- Potocki, p. 320.
- ibid, p. 321.
- Serczyk, p. 311.
- E.g. Encyclopedia Britannica, "History of Ukraine" article.
- Rajca, p. 77.
- Davies, Wheatcroft, pp. 424-5
- Tauger 1991 and the acrimonious exchange between Tauger and Conquest .
References
- Stephen Wheatcroft Wheatcroft and RW Davies, Soviet Agriculture: 1931-33, Years of Hunger, Palgrave MacMillan, 2004 p.487
- Wheatcroft and Davies
- Wheatcroft and Davies p.490
- Wheatroft and Davies, p. 448
- ibid
- Wheatcroft and Davies, pp.167-168, 198-203
- Wheatcroft and Davies, p.198.
- Wheatcroft and Davies, pg.214
- Wheatcroft and Davies, p. 217
- Wheatcroft and Davies, p.471
- Wheatcroft and Davies, p 51, 53, 61-63, 66, 68, 70, 73-76, 109, 119-23, 131, 231, 239, 260, 269, 271n, 400, 439, 458-9
- Wheatcroft and Davies, p.439
- Wheatcroft and Davies, p.69
- Wheatcroft and Davies, pp.119-23
- ibid,
- ibid
- Wheatcroft and Davies, p.111
- ibid
- Wheatcroft and Davies, pg.449
- Terry Martin, The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923-1939., Ithaca. N.I., 2001, p. 306
- Wheatcroft and Davies, p.415
- Wheatcroft and Davies, p.429
- Wheatcroft and Davies, p.512
- ^ Stanislav Kulchytsky, "How many of us perished in Holodomor in 1933", Zerkalo Nedeli, November 23-29, 2002. Available online in Russian and in Ukrainian
- Stalislav Kulchytsky, "Reasons of the 1933 famine in Ukraine. Through the pages of one almost forgotten book" Zerkalo Nedeli, August 16-22, 2003. Available online in Russian and in Ukrainian.
- Stanislav Kulchytsky, "Reasons of the 1933 famine in Ukraine-2", Zerkalo Nedeli, October 4-10, 2003. Available online in Russian and in Ukrainian
- Stalislav Kuchytsky, "Demographic lossed in Ukrainian in the twentieth century", Zerkalo Nedeli, October 2-8, 2004. Available online in Russian and in Ukrainian.
- J.Arch Getty, "The Future Did Not Work", The Atlantic Monthly, Boston: March 2000, Vol. 285, Iss.3, pg.113
- Cite error: The named reference
Himka
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - Countries whose government recognize Holodomor as Genocide are Argentina , Australia , Azerbaijan , Belgium , Canada , Estonia , Georgia , Hungary , Italy , Latvia , Lithuania , Moldova , Poland , United States and the Vatican
- Bradley, Lara. "Ukraine's 'Forced Famine' Officially Recognized. The Sundbury Star. 3 January 1999. URL Accessed 12 October 2006
- Yushchenko, Viktor. Decree No. 868/2006 by President of Ukraine. Regarding the Remembrance Day in 2006 for people who died as a result of Holodomor and political repressions Template:Uk icon
- World News Briefs. The Day. 1 November 2006. URL Accessed: 1 November 2006
- US House of Representatives Authorizes Construction of Ukrainian Genocide Monument
- Statement by Pope John Paul II on the 70th anniversary of the Famine
- HR356 "Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the man-made famine that occurred in Ukraine in 1932-1933", U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, D.C., October 21, 2003
- U.S. Congress Library Exhibit on Ukrainian Famine, "Resolution Of The Council Of People's Commissars Of The Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic And Of The Central Committee Of The Communist Party (Bolshevik) Of Ukraine On Blacklisting Villages That Maliciously Sabotage The Collection Of Grain", December 6, 1932.
- Dana G. Dalrymple, "The Soviet famine of 1932-1934" in Soviet Studies, Vol. 15, No. 3 (Jan., 1964). Pages 250-284.
- Robert Conquest, "The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-Famine" (Chapter 16: "The Death Roll" ), University of Alberta Press, 1986.
- Template:En icon Mark B. Tauger, "The 1932 Harvest and the Famine of 1933" in Slavic Review 50 No 1, Spring 1991, pp. 70-89
- Template:En icon Letters of Mark Tauger and Robert Conquest in Slavic Review 51 No 1, pp. 192-4
- Template:En icon Letters of Mark Tauger and Robert Conquest in Slavic Review 53 No 1, pp. 318-9
- Template:En icon David Marples, "Debating the undebatable? Ukraine Famine of 1932-1933" in Edmonton Journal, June 28, 2002.
- Robert Potocki, "Polityka państwa polskiego wobec zagadnienia ukraińskiego w latach 1930-1939" (in Polish, English summary), Lublin 2003, ISBN 83-917615-4-1
- Template:Pl icon Władysław A. Serczyk, "Historia Ukrainy", 3rd ed., Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław 2001, ISBN 83-04-04530-3
- Andrew Gregorovich, "Genocide in Ukraine 1933", part 4: "How Did Stalin Organize the Genocide?" , Ukrainian Canadian Research & Documentation Centre, Toronto 1998.
- U.S. Commission on the Ukraine Famine, "Findings of the Commission on the Ukraine Famine" , Report to Congress, Washington, D.C., April 19 1988
- Dr. Otto Schiller, "Famine's Return to Russia, Death and Depopulation in Wide Areas of the Grain Country" , The Daily Telegraph, 25 August, 1933, as well as British Diplomatic Reports on the Ukrainian Famine.
- "12th Congress of the Communist Party (Bolshevik) of Ukraine, Stenograph Record", Kharkiv 1934.
- Miron Dolot, "Execution by Hunger. A Hidden Holocaust", New York 1985, ISBN 0-393-01886-5
- Sergei Maksudov, "Losses Suffered by the Population of the USSR 1918–1958", in The Samizdat Register II, ed R. Medvedev (London–New York 1981)
- R.W. Davies & Stephen G. Wheatcroft, "The Years of Hunger: Soviet Agriculture 1931-33", Palgrave 2004.
- Subtelny, Orest (1988). Ukraine: A History. Toronto: University of Toronto Press,. ISBN 0-8020-5809-6.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) - Czesław Rajca, "Głód na Ukrainie", Werset, Lublin/Toronto 2005, ISBN 83-60133-04-2
- James Mace, "The Man-Made Famine of 1933 in Soviet Ukraine" in "Famine in Ukraine 1932-1933", p. 1-14, Edmonton 1986
- Ярослав Грицак (Jarosław Hrycak), "Historia Ukrainy 1772-1999. Narodziny nowoczesnego narodu", Lublin 2000, ISBN 83-85854-50-9, available online in Ukrainian language
- Yuri Shapoval, "The famine-genocide of 1932-1933 in Ukraine", Kashtan Press, Ontario 2005, ISBN 1-896354-38-6 (a collection of source documents)
- Andrea Graziosi, "The Soviet 1931-33 Famines and the Ukrainian Holodomor: Is A New Interpretation Possible, What Would Its Consequences Be?", September 2005
External links
Declarations and legal acts
- Findings of the Commission on the Ukraine Famine, U.S. Commission on the Ukraine Famine, Report to Congress. Adopted by the Commission, April 19 1988
- Joint declaration at the United Nations in connection with 70th anniversary of the Great Famine in Ukraine 1932-1933
- Address of the Verkhovna Rada to the Ukrainian nation on commemorating the victims of Holodomor 1932-1933 (in Ukrainian)
Books
- Marco Carynnyk, Lubomyr Luciuk and Bohdan S Kordan, eds, The Foreign Office and the Famine: British Documents on Ukraine and the Great Famine of 1932-1933, foreword by Michael Marrus (Kingston: Limestone Press, 1988)
- Robert Conquest, The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-Famine (1986)
- Wasyl Hryshko, The Ukrainian Holocaust of 1933, (Toronto: 1983, Bahriany Foundation)
- Miron Dolot, Execution by Hunger: The Hidden Holocaust (WW Norton & Compnay, 1985)
- Leonard Leshuk, ed, Days of Famine, Nights of Terror: Firsthand Accounts of Soviet Collectivization, 1928-1934 (Kingston: Kashtan Press, 1995)
- Lubomyr Luciuk, ed, Not Worthy: Walter Duranty's Pulitzer Prize and The New York Times (Kingston: Kashtan Press, 2004)
- Douglas Tottle, Fraud, Famine, and Fascism: The Ukrainian Genocide Myth from Hitler to Harvard (1987)
External links
- Template:Uk icon Template:Ru icon "The Harvest of Sorrow". Retrieved 2006-07-05. by Robert Conquest.
- "US House of Representatives Authorizes Construction of Ukrainian Genocide Monument". Retrieved 2006-07-05.
- "Statement by Pope John Paul II on the 70th anniversary of the Famine". Retrieved 2006-07-05.
- HR356 "Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the man-made famine that occurred in Ukraine in 1932-1933". Retrieved 2006-07-05.
{{cite web}}
: Check|url=
value (help) U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, D.C., October 21, 2003 - "Gareth Jones' international exposure of the Holodomor, plus many related background articles". Retrieved 2006-07-05.
- Template:Uk icon Famine in Ukraine 1932–1933 at the Central State Archive of Ukraine (photos, links)
- Template:Uk icon Lessons of History. Holodomor 1932-33
- 1932-34 Great Famine: documented view by Dr. Dana Dalrymple
- The Holodomor Memorial Website
- Testimony by Robert Conquest to the U.S. Commission on the Ukraine Famine
- Famine Genocide Commemorative Committee Ukrainian Canadian Congress, Toronto Branch
- Template:Uk icon/Template:Hu icon Collection of analytical articles and photos
- video recording of Valery Kuchinsky, the Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the United Nations, addressing General Assembly at its plenary meeting on 1 November 2005 (the recording is of the whole session, Kuchinsky's address starts at 27 min)
- Carynnyk, Marco (1983). "The New York Times and the Great Famine". Ukraine Weekly. LI (37).
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - Klid, Bohdan (2003). "Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies publicizes new research on Famine". Ukraine Weekly. LXXI (52).
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) A summary of Yuri Shapoval's lecture, 2003 - Yaroslav Bilinsky (1999). "Was the Ukrainian Famine of 1932-1933 Genocide?". Journal of Genocide Research. 1 (2): 147–156.
- Web site of Mark Tauger, author of several of the references listed above
- Stanislav Kulchytsky, Italian Research on the Holodomor, October 2005.
- Template:En icon Stanislav Kulchytsky, "Why did Stalin exterminate the Ukrainians? Comprehending the Holodomor. The position of Soviet historians" - Six part series from Den: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6; Kulchytsky on Holodomor 1-6
- Template:Ru icon/Template:Uk icon Valeriy Soldatenko, "A starved 1933: subjectove thoughts on objective processes", Zerkalo Nedeli, June 28 - July 4, 2003. Available online in Russian and in Ukrainian.
- Template:Ru icon/Template:Uk icon Stanislav Kulchytsky's articles in Zerkalo Nedeli, Kiev, Ukraine"
- "How many of us perish in Holodomor on 1933", November 23-29, 2002. Available online in Russian and in Ukrainian.
- "Reasons of the 1933 famine in Ukraine. Through the pages of one almost forgotten book" Augist 16-22, 2003. Available online in Russian and in Ukrainian.
- "Reasons of the 1933 famine in Ukraine-2", October 4-10, 2003. Available online in Russian and in Ukrainian.
- "Demographic lossed in Ukrainian in the twentieth century", October 2-8, 2004. Available online in Russian and in Ukrainian.
- "Holodomor-33: Why and how?" November 25 - December 1. Available online in Russian and in Ukrainian.
- UKRAINIAN FAMINE Revelations from the Russian Archives at the Library of Congress