This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 05:34, 27 October 2019 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Women's Health/Archive 1) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:34, 27 October 2019 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Women's Health/Archive 1) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Women's Health Project‑class | |||||||
|
Women Project‑class | |||||||
|
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Women's Health and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
Digital media use and mental health FA nom
Hello! I was wondering if any members of the WikiProject could kindly take a look at the review for this article that I nominated. The recent DYK may be of interest to the WikiProject. -- 14:16, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Women in Red's stub contest is starting now
Our three-month stub contest is starting now and will continue until the end of the year. Although there will be no physical prizes, each month (October, November and December) recognition will be given to the winners of two different sections: one for new stubs, the other for enhancing existing stubs to start class and beyond. The contest is open to all registered members of Women in Red. Join in now and help us improve women's coverage on Misplaced Pages.--Ipigott (talk) 19:35, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Request for reassessment - postpartum blues
I have significantly expanded the article on postpartum blues and would like to request a reassessment. The article is currently rated as start-class and does not have a rating on the importance scale. Thank you! Mlshulk (talk) 14:53, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, and thanks for your work on this article! You have hugely improved it with good writing and high-quality sources. I don't consider myself to be knowledgable in this topic, so personally I would rather defer to someone else to assess it. This WikiProject doesn't have a lot of watchers, so you might want to put in a request at WT:MED which is much more active. Another option is to nominate it for WP:GA. If nobody steps up to assess the article, don't feel bad - people here usually prefer to solve problems than to reassess good work. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 17:16, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for your quick reply! I have posted it for assessment on WikiProject Medicine. I'm currently still re-writing the causes section but will consider nominating it for a GA once my edits are more complete. Mlshulk (talk) 00:41, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Categories: