This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hijiri88 (talk | contribs) at 06:04, 23 November 2019 (I don't have time to get into another back-and-forth. I'll post this once November is over.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:04, 23 November 2019 by Hijiri88 (talk | contribs) (I don't have time to get into another back-and-forth. I'll post this once November is over.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- I'm not going to touch anything in your second or third paragraphs. As for the first -- are we talking about mottai or mottainashi? No one has ever argued that either word doesn't have a religious sense, and indeed my new favourite source Hasegawa is quite open about the fact that
inexpedient or reprehensible towards a god, buddha, noble or the like
is the original sense of the word mottainashi, so the claim that you are here to defend the view that mottai was used in Buddhist texts is ... bizarre. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 06:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- I'm not going to touch anything in your second or third paragraphs. As for the first -- are we talking about mottai or mottainashi? No one has ever argued that either word doesn't have a religious sense, and indeed my new favourite source Hasegawa is quite open about the fact that