This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hijiri88 (talk | contribs) at 20:15, 23 November 2019 (Probably time to archive. I'll keep the block notice there for a week so I don't forget.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:15, 23 November 2019 by Hijiri88 (talk | contribs) (Probably time to archive. I'll keep the block notice there for a week so I don't forget.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Note: If you open multiple sections on my talk page at the same time, about the same issue, I will likely merge them into one.
Archives
|
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| 11 |
November 2019
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 15:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
@Floquenbeam: Where did I dispute "particularly with Lightburst"? I was one of numerous editors commenting on the Article Rescue Squadron's disruptive behaviour. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 15:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- In particular here and here. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Where did either of those edits mention Lightburst? Yeah, I got a problem with the way a number of editors have behaved toward me and others, but I was one of numerous editors expressing this problem.
- Anyway, I don't really care enough to stay blocked over this. If I promise to stay away from that discussion and any ARS-related discussions for the next week, will you unblock me so I can contribute to Misplaced Pages Asian Month?
- Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 15:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- The block's purpose is two-fold; to stop your ongoing commenting on Lightburst, and to deincentivize you from doing it again when the block expires. Your suggestion would address the first purpose, but not the second. If you just keep feuding until you're blocked, and then say "OK, now' I'll stop feuding", you're missing the point. If you make an unblock request, an independent reviewing admin might disagree, and that's fine, but my own opinion is this block should last the whole week, to emphasize that you really, really, really need to stop feuding with others. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:03, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- To be clear, it's not my intention to "keep feuding", and that wasn't even my intention before you blocked me. There is a "feud" (really a series of poorly formatted amendment proposals) going on at VPP that were concerning to me. That will likely keep going on indefinitely until something is done whatever decision I as an individual make, but I really wouldn't be interested in it enough to let it distract me from writing articles if it weren't for real-world circumstances making writing articles hard for most of this week. (And FWIW, I wrote the following appeal before I saw your most recent message, but I don't think anything about it has changed. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 16:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- The block's purpose is two-fold; to stop your ongoing commenting on Lightburst, and to deincentivize you from doing it again when the block expires. Your suggestion would address the first purpose, but not the second. If you just keep feuding until you're blocked, and then say "OK, now' I'll stop feuding", you're missing the point. If you make an unblock request, an independent reviewing admin might disagree, and that's fine, but my own opinion is this block should last the whole week, to emphasize that you really, really, really need to stop feuding with others. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:03, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- In particular here and here. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Hijiri88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Message received. I'll stay away from Lightburst and all ARS discussions and any references to ARS members collectively in a manner that includes Lightburst. I really just want to write articles for WAM at the moment, and was distracted by other stuff during the week so that most of my Misplaced Pages activity over the last 48 hours was posting on a discussion that I probably should have been staying that hell away from. I've learned my lesson, anyway (which unfortunately came on Friday night right before I was gonna devote my first free Saturday this month to writing articles). Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 16:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Well, it looks like Awilley has gone offline, and since he specifically said below that he prefers your approach, I'll unblock even though I don't quite agree. I'm hoping that even after the week away from ARS and ARS discussions is over, you'll still do whatever is in your control to just not start things with them, and also not react if they start things with you. I may be wrong about what specific approach to use to try to put an end to it, but I am much more confident in saying that I am not alone in insisting that it has to stop. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:03, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
@Floquenbeam: This seems reasonable to me, and I think the commitment Hijiri made about to stay away from Lightburst will have a bigger effect on their behavior than just letting the block expire. ~Awilley (talk) 17:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Awilley: I'm happy to defer to your judgement. Maybe you're right. Also, I should have made clearer for unblocking admin review: this block wasn't out of the blue, on my talk page I've been warning both of them about it this week. It just needs to stop, you know? Please feel free to unblock if you're comfortable that it's a better way to achieve that. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2019 (UTC)