This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SHNICI (talk | contribs) at 04:08, 23 December 2019 (→A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove message). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:08, 23 December 2019 by SHNICI (talk | contribs) (→A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove message)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 | Where this user is, it is 7:46 am, 27 December 2024 GMT . |
THANKS!
Thank you for your help, and could you check my talkpage to see if i did it correctly? also have a very happy new year! James The Bond 007 (talk) 19:52, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- James The Bond 007, Looks right to me. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 15:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thank you for the message! Happy Holidays! --Sir Bond 007 (James The Bond 007) (talk) 15:29, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
The Happiness Tour
The last two dates Dec 30th and Dec 31st are not part of the happiness begins tour as they said on their Instagram story 4 days ago that said "Thank you doesn't begin even cover it. We've had such an incredible time seeing you guys over the past few months!! Thank you to each and every person who's come to a show this run. It's felt amazing being back on stage together again and we can't wait to do it again in 2020! #HappinessBeginsTour (2A00:23C7:A088:3D01:A15F:F8A2:3090:E706 (talk) 14:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC))
- I'd reverted this edit, as it was unsourced. We can't tell people to go and find a source themselves. Although citing social media is generally avoided, because it is not the most reliable of sources, but if you must, please use Template:Cite web to fill in a citation.
- Also, no need to ping users on their talk pages, as they are notified when their talk page is edited anyway.
- Thanks,
- ~~ OxonAlex - talk 14:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
New Page Review newsletter December 2019
- Reviewer of the Year
This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.
Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.
Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rosguill (talk) | 47,395 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Onel5969 (talk) | 41,883 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | JTtheOG (talk) | 11,493 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Arthistorian1977 (talk) | 5,562 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | DannyS712 (talk) | 4,866 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) | 3,995 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 3,812 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Boleyn (talk) | 3,655 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Ymblanter (talk) | 3,553 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Cwmhiraeth (talk) | 3,522 | Patrol Page Curation |
(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)
- Redirect autopatrol
A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.
- Source Guide Discussion
Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
- This month's refresher course
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Misplaced Pages:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.
16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you!
|
Thank you! |
| Thanks for your writing to me.
Can I ask you simply to edit or post it properly then my contribution to AALC disambiguation page, I was trying to edit it good as possible, but probably that's not been enough referring facts relied to the abbreviator "AALC". "AALC" have too and other association which I contribute, and knowing the limitation and the options which can be used for disambiguation page I done all my best. I wasn't sure only do I'm allowed to add References to the Disambiguation page. Or are you able then to notice me all my mistakes/errors I done, because "external links" if I read properly the help contribution wiki pages aren't forbidden. Isn't for advertising, it's for simple explanation to what may refer "AALC" which come on the search engines and on WIKIPEDIA as wrong or not complete information. I don't post spam or advertising there, otherwise from the point of view you have to "edit"/remove and few other associations relied to "AALC" which the same way come as advertising or spam. Thank you in advance! If you decide to done the editing properly, you have the source from the history. Best Regards Georgi Mihaylov / SHNICI (talk) 16:21, 22 December 2019 (UTC) |
- @SHNICI: The purpose of a disambiguation page is to list all of our articles that could be reached by a certain term. For example, if someone enters an acronym into search, search can't know which article the user wanted, so a list of all the possible options is given. As the purpose of these pages is to direct users to actual articles, content that isn't a link and short description of an article isn't placed on them ~~ OxonAlex - talk 17:10, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
| Thank you for the explanation, so I do miss understand when I read about the disambiguation pages!
Sorry about the "troubles" I done. Best Regards Georgi Mihaylov / SHNICI (talk) 04:08, 23 December 2019 (UTC) |