This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rotem Dan (talk | contribs) at 15:33, 19 May 2003 (Expanded, this is a bit redundant with Scientific skepticism but I think it should be here.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:33, 19 May 2003 by Rotem Dan (talk | contribs) (Expanded, this is a bit redundant with Scientific skepticism but I think it should be here.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Skepticism is (A) Philosophical skepticism - a philosophical position in which people chooose to critically examine whether the knowledge and perceptions what they have are actually true, and whether or not on can ever be said to have true knowledge like; or (B) Scientific skepticism - a scientific, or practical, position in which one does not accept the veracity of claims until solid evidence is produced in accordance with the scientific method.
Scientific skepticism is related to, but not identical to, philosophical skepticism. Many scientists and doctors who are skeptical of claims of the paranormal are nonetheless not adherents of classical philosophical skepticism. When critics of controversial scientific or paranormal claims are said to be skeptical, this only refers to their taking a position of scientific skepticism.
Some common misconceptions about skepticism
In common use, a skeptic refers to a person who is taking a critical position in a given situation, usually by employing the principles of critical thinking and the scientific method to evaluate the validity of claims and practices. Skeptics are often confused, or denounced as cynics, it should be noted, however, that skeptics choose their approaches methodically, not arbitarilly.
Skeptics vs. Debunkers
Skeptics are related to debunkers but the latter refers more to the active practice of debunking, which is, presenting unquestionable evidence to demonstrate the falsehood of claims.