Misplaced Pages

Talk:Tea Party movement

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 15:49, 17 February 2020 (Signing comment by 96.237.223.247 - "Suggestion (content): "). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:49, 17 February 2020 by SineBot (talk | contribs) (Signing comment by 96.237.223.247 - "Suggestion (content): ")(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tea Party movement article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25Auto-archiving period: 6 months 
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about the Tea Party movement, or any other aspect of politics whatsoever. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about the Tea Party movement, or any other aspect of politics whatsoever at the Reference desk.
Tea Party movement received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUnited States Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPolitics Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconConservatism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:WikiProject Libertarianism

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconSociology: Social Movements Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the social movements task force.
The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.contractfromamerica.org/the-contract-from-america. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2010102610010161.
This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en(a)wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tea Party movement article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25Auto-archiving period: 6 months 
There is a moderated discussion taking place on this sub-page which is aiming to get consensus on a broadly stable and balanced version of the article. The discussion is open to all, and more participants are welcome. SilkTork 22:52, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Fixing Dead links/Some Citation-needed

Citation Needed:

References to the Boston Tea Party were part of Tax Day protests held in the 1990s and before. In 1984, David H. Koch and Charles G. Koch of Koch Industries founded Citizens for a Sound Economy (CSE), a conservative political group whose self-described mission was "to fight for less government, lower taxes, and less regulation." Congressman Ron Paul was appointed as the first chairman of the organization. The CSE lobbied for policies favorable to corporations, particularly tobacco companies. - https://www.citizen.org/sites/default/files/citizens_for_a_sound_economy_report.pdf


New/archived sources for dead links:


30. http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/fac_schol/546/

73. https://web.archive.org/web/20090308214530/http://www.freedomworks.org/press-releases/dick-armey-to-lead-citizens-for-a-sound-economy

92. https://web.archive.org/web/20100111031916/https://spectator.org/archives/2009/04/15/the-tea-party-revolution

107. https://web.archive.org/web/20121009142237/https://www.cnbc.com/id/29283701/Rick_Santelli_s_Shout_Heard_Round_the_World

110. https://web.archive.org/web/20110224231955/http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/la-na-tea-party-ads-20100919,0,5669482.story

112. https://web.archive.org/web/20110815083243/http://video.foxnews.com/v/3924410/worst-case-scenario-no-3/

Misinformation: Desire to repeal 14 Amendment

Towards the end of the fourth paragraph of the "Agenda" section, it states that "Several constitutional amendments have been targeted by some in the movement for full or partial repeal, including the 14th, 16th, and 17th." The article cited for this information makes no mention of wanting to repeal the 14th, only the 16th and 17th, in addition to adding a "Repeal Amendment." I see this as a potentially significant error in the section because it could make a serious implication that, without proper evidence, the Tea Party movement supports unequal rights and potentially racism. If they do in fact wish to repeal the 14th, there needs to be other information cited and have this topic expanded upon, explaining why they want it repealed, including potentially less than honorable tendencies if that is a valid and sensible claim according to provided trustworthy (i.e. unbiased and factual) information. Patriotic524 (talk) 05:57, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

This is not to mention that such a movement to repeal that amendment would seem to contradict the spirit of the movement described in the rest of the article. Patriotic524 (talk) 06:03, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Suggestion (grammatical)

Consider replacing the word over, in the last sentence of the first paragraph, with more than

...various polls in 2013 estimate that slightly over 10 percent of Americans identify as part of the movement.

--2601:CD:C101:7F46:19A3:5C7C:3F98:80C5 (talk) 10:02, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

This whole page is MOSTLY WRONG because the modern-day tea party movement started in 2007 not 2009 and was not and is STILL not part of the GOP.

I know because I helped found it in 2007 and still run it in NH. It was created by Ron Paul supporters, and he was the 'father' of the movement. It was non-partisan and intended to talk about issues that were being ignored for the upcoming 2008 presidential election. We had already held our first event in Boston on Dec 16, 2007 after I organized a 400 person event in Pembroke NH that February with Kent Snyder featuring Ron himself who then decided to run. People tossed boxes of tea in the water all over the US, including Dr. Paul in Lake Jackson Texas on Dec 16. Pete Santilli saw us do this, he knew about the movement, as he was a confidant of Ron's. Later when he was ranting about something of a financial nature, he declared that even HE might stage a tea party at Lake Michigan... knowing we'd already been doing it for TWO YEARS.

Another protest happened on July 12, 2008 when 10,000 Ron Paul supporters descended upon DC at the West Side of Capitol Hill for a “Revolution March”. That was our big showing that year. In 2009 I myself organized a 4,000 person tea party on the green in Manchester NH.

Here is the full background.

http://www.nhteapartycoalition.org/tea/about-join/ http://www.nhteapartycoalition.org/tea/2009/11/21/who-owns-the-tea-party-movement/

All the groups you mention (Patriots, Express, and others) were formed in 2009, they stole the name, and were merely PACs for the GOP Inc. When they arrived in NH in 2012 insisting they endorsed Romney we wrote to the papers explaining they were NOT the real teaparty and that we in NO WAY endorsed Romney or any other candidate just as we never endorsed TRUMP.

In December 2019 the authentic, NON-GOP teaparty had its 12th anniversary.

If you want further clarification just email me, the addresses are on this website. http://www.nhteapartycoalition.org/tea/

nhtpc@nhteapartycoalition.org

Please get the history correct, especially the part where we are NOT connected to the GOP. Please remember that — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.237.223.247 (talk) 15:48, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Libertarian

Wouldn't this article also be part of a series of Libertarianism? MJV479 (talk) 21:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

If history hadn't been rewritten it would. But the 2007 origin of the Tea Party movement has fallen down the memory hole. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 12:54, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Categories: