Talk:Enterobiasis - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rfl0216 (talk | contribs) at 00:52, 20 February 2020 (Assessment: Medicine (Redirect), Sanitation (NA), +banner shell (Rater)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:52, 20 February 2020 by Rfl0216 (talk | contribs) (Assessment: Medicine (Redirect), Sanitation (NA), +banner shell (Rater))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Ideal sources for Misplaced Pages's health content are defined in the guideline Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Enterobiasis.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

This redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine: Dermatology Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Dermatology task force.

Sanitation Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sanitation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sanitation on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SanitationWikipedia:WikiProject SanitationTemplate:WikiProject Sanitationsanitation
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:WP1.0

Appendicitis

This statement may be getting confused with another 'fact' - approximately 30% of all appendicitis patients are found to be infested with worms, so possibly not the cause of the appendicitis, but something found at surgery Ianguy 01:56, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

30% is serious enough to demand a search for a causal relationship. Are there any such studies done recently? It something on should look out for... BroVic (talk) 23:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Why have Notes and References when the notes just lead to the references?

I suggest to re-arrange it so that citations lead directly to the references, rather than to the notes first and then to the references. As far as I know, notes are meant to be look footnotes, but not like normal citations. EvM-Susana (talk) 11:42, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Makes a lot of sense. BroVic (talk) 23:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Garlic

Wow, I've heard before a mention of the efficacy of garlic in the management of helminthic infections. This is really worth looking into, especially garlic is food based and without (serious!) side effects. BroVic (talk) 23:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Categories: