This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington (talk | contribs) at 16:09, 18 December 2006 (comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:09, 18 December 2006 by Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington (talk | contribs) (comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) user - talk - contributions - email - desk - sandbox - status:
|
MessagesArchives: The Basement · My desk · My Barnstars User talk:Jimbo Wales unprotectionWould you object to this page being un-semi-protected? --Sam Blanning 02:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Strange deletionOn what grounds did you delete Pingus? The deletion debate certainly shows no consensus for deletion. The game is notable and has been mentioned in several high profile publications, including even CNN .--Eloquence* 00:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for votingFile:In-the-dark.jpg Thank you for voting in my RfA which at 51/20/6 unfortunately did not achieve consensus. In closing the nomination, Essjay remarked that it was one of the better discussed RfAs seen recently and I would like to thank you and all others who chose to vote for making it as such. It was extremely humbling to see the large number of support votes, and the number of oppose votes and comments will help me to become stronger. I hope to run again for adminship soon. Thank you all once more. Wikiwoohoo 19:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Thanks!Hi, Thanks for removing the protection on the India page! This, as you well know, is a mixed blessing. :) ]] 16:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC) Concordia NewsletterConcordia is currently trying to relaunch. I, and all the members of the ex-council, wish to welcome new members to the group. We are a group who aim to promote remaining civil, in an environment where messages can easily be interpretated wrongly. Help out now!
We are a community, so can only work though community contributions and support. It's the helping that counts. Decision MakingThe council expired one month ago, but due to the current position of the group the current council will remain until the position of the group can be assessed, and whether it would be sensible to keep Concordia going. For most decisions, however, it will be decided by all who choose to partake in discussions. I am trying to relaunch because of the vast amounts of new members we have received, demonstrating that the aims are supported. If you wish to opt of of further talk-page communications, just let us know here. - Ian¹³/t 20:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC). Kindly delivered by MiszaBot. Re WP:SIGHello. Could you kindly review the above-mentioned guideline and remove the image from your signature? Best wishes. — Nearly Headless Nick 15:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Pinguis DRVWhen you take action on a DRV discussion, you can simply close it, no reason to keep it open. ~ trialsanderrors 23:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC) User talk:DakshayaniThis user's ben asking for unblock for over a day now; could you respond to him? Thanks. Part Deux 20:13, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
I sure did, and called you the name that Samir once used, though I refrained from typing it down :-) Tintin (talk) 11:25, 18 December 2006 (UTC) lol! :-)--thunderboltz 11:37, 18 December 2006 (UTC) HelloThank you for pointing that you. I will surely keep that in mind the next time I edit wikipedia Regards naxalrevolution
Thanks for the welcomeHi Nick, Just letting you know that I replied on my talk page. You can remove this notice now if you like. 81.104.210.31 11:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
maybe it was n00b massages ;) 81.104.210.31 11:39, 18 December 2006 (UTC) Barrington HallPlease do not delete sections of text or valid links from Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to Barrington Hall. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. See the discussion on the Talk:Barrington Hall page - you are incorrectly interpreting the policy. Argyriou (talk) 15:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Bitis arietans YouTube link removalHi Nick, I noticed you recently removed a YouTube link from the Bitis arietans article. Most of the YouTube links were removed from this series of articles a while ago because they lacked copyright information, but the one you removed does have copyright information. It's at the end of the video and says "© Al Coritz 2006, Deadly Beautiful Zoological, LLC." Did you accidentally not notice this, or is this copyright information not good enough? If not, what's missing? --Jwinius 16:03, 18 December 2006 (UTC) |