User talk:Chesdovi - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PurpleRain (talk | contribs) at 17:21, 19 December 2006 (→Help requested!: Remove {{helpme}}, as it seems the question was answered. If you need further help, please replace the tag.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:21, 19 December 2006 by PurpleRain (talk | contribs) (→Help requested!: Remove {{helpme}}, as it seems the question was answered. If you need further help, please replace the tag.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Bruchim Haboim

Welcome!

Hello, Chesdovi, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Come join us at WP:ORBCW. - CrazyRussian talk/email 11:25, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Tiferesyisrael48.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tiferesyisrael48.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Misplaced Pages articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 15:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Jospeh Karo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jospeh Karo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: "Rivial claims" section of Al-Aqsa Mosque article

I am writing in an advocacy capacity for User:Thestick's concerns with the "Rival claims" section of this article. I respectfully request you to provide a statement here User:Amerique/AMA as to how you feel this this section fits within WP:NPOV, WP:VERIFY and WP:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox. Our aim is to resolve this dispute civilly and entirely within the bounds of WP:FAITH. I appreciate your time. Thank you, --Amerique 04:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Almorso has added a statement to the page above. Please consider adding a statement so we can try to resolve this situation without taking it further up the WP:DR process. Thank you,--Amerique 04:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Even Hashtiya

Your recent additions to the article were magnificent.... btw I wondered if you saw the recent "development" with Uri Ariel ? Amoruso 14:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Your help is badly needed to improve the article Moriah. Amoruso 05:42, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Questionable

I am glad you like it, you may be happy to know it is not yet complete. I have only used half of the material on the source so far. --Shamir1 21:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Temple Mount - recent events

Could you just give the reason why it was deleted? Thanks! Chesdovi 11:27, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry - I thought I was making a much smaller edit, but was mistakenly editting an earlier version of the page. I have put everything back. --Eliyak T·C 23:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

if someone changes links

It's possible simply to go back to an early version and copy paste the original links, n'est pas? Amoruso 19:12, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edit in 1929 Hebron massacre

Hi Dovid, I am wondering whether it was your intention to leave JAZ link and Kaplan's story there . I tried to explain at talk why I do not believe they belong there. Thanks. ←Humus sapiens 03:36, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Third holiest site suggestion

Chesdovi, I think that you're correct that the article should stay, but wanted to offer what I hope you'll take as constructive criticism.

I think that accusing muslim editors of being biased because they are muslim won't help the argument, any more than the regular accusations against pro-Israel, pro-Catholic, etc., editors ever help. First, it just makes everyone mad, and it never convinces anyone. You can respond to editors on the merits of their arguments, and if you're right, you will usually win, but arguing that Second, it might be construed as a personal attack, which will be one strike against the "keep the article" side if this ever ends up in arbitration. Third, it's not, IMHO, really fair. Striver is the only "delete the article" editor with whom I have had much prior experience, but he/she is clearly not in some doctrinal lockstep - he voted to keep twice, then changed the second keep to a delete.
More specifically, I suggest that you delete this edit - it won't do any good, and it may end up further inflaming the debate.

Thanks, and let me know if I can help, TheronJ 14:47, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

- I was actually replying to (→Netscott) not stirver, but point accepted, Thanks. Chesdovi 15:14, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Shalom

I saw your excellent creation Kathiraveli_November_2006_massacre. It was a timely creation unfortunately someelse had also created Vaharai bombing about the same incident. Please do what ever you want with these 2 articles to merge them together. Thanks for your interest.RaveenS 19:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Vaharai

I don't understand Which article are you talking about? Sudharsansn (talk • contribs) 14:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Vaharai is what we have heard in the papers, we also saw Kathiraveli as the village within the Vaharai division. Hope this calrifies. It is a village within a municipality. Thanks RaveenS 16:18, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

After you merge an article all what you have to do is simply redirect it to the new merged article, no need to delete. ThanksRaveenS 16:33, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Protected articles

I know you aren't very chatty, but since the THS and Aqsa Mosque articles are protected now how about we discuss and set aside any differences and reach a consensus on several issues including how to wikilink to the article. Regards - thestick 04:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Noahide

Hi, please join in the discussion on the Noahide Laws talk page about cleaning it up etc. Thanks! Chavatshimshon 08:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Olomouc 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Olomouc 2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 06:15, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Olomouc_1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Olomouc_1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 08:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

DYK

On December 14, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Remuh Synagogue, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for the great article and your history contributions Chesdovi. This article kindly nominated by User:GeeJo - feel free to self-nominate in future. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Holiest sites in Islam article

Having fun? thestick 11:36, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Please don't vandalize the article. thestick 12:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Last warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. -- Szvest - 14:39, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

48 hour block

You have been blocked from editing for disruption to Holiest sites in Islam after final warning. Durova 08:51, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Help requested!

Would someone please contact User:Durova for me and ask for it to respond to the unanswered e-mails I have sent. How much longer am I supposed to wait?! Cheers!

If you sent e-mails then he got them. Your block is 48 hours from 00:50, December 19, 2006, you need to wait until 00:50, December 21, 2006. If you are contesting your block use the {{unblock|reason}} template. HighInBC 16:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much HighInBC. I didn't want to use it until I had used the advised option of sending an e-mail to the cause of the blockage. As I got no response, I will now have to resort to the next step. How unhelpful of User:Durova! Chesdovi 17:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Chesdovi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe that User:Durova has unjustifiably blocked me and this is causing me much concern and angst. User:Durova accuses me of vandalism after my final warning, I want proof of this!

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I believe that ] has unjustifiably blocked me and this is causing me much concern and angst. ] accuses me of vandalism after my final warning, I want proof of this! |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I believe that ] has unjustifiably blocked me and this is causing me much concern and angst. ] accuses me of vandalism after my final warning, I want proof of this! |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I believe that ] has unjustifiably blocked me and this is causing me much concern and angst. ] accuses me of vandalism after my final warning, I want proof of this! |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Category:

Requests for unblock