Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Tim Smith (DJ) - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BD2412 (talk | contribs) at 22:32, 5 August 2020 (The result was '''moved to Draft:Tim Smith (DJ)'''.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:32, 5 August 2020 by BD2412 (talk | contribs) (The result was '''moved to Draft:Tim Smith (DJ)'''.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was moved to Draft:Tim Smith (DJ). There is clearly no consensus for deletion, but neither does policy permit the article to remain in mainspace with no secondary sources and no indication that such sources exist. I am therefore moving this to draft until secondary sources have been added, at which point this can be resubmitted through the usual AFC process. BD2412 T 22:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Tim Smith (DJ)

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Tim Smith (DJ) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although on a national station and a few local radio stations, there is nothing to suggest notability. This areticle doesn't meet WP:BIO criteria - Funky Snack (Talk) 06:13, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

  • Keep- Although it doesn't have much references to it but those refs which are there in the article are Sufficient enough to pass GNG. Dtt1 07:13, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Are the references sufficient enough to pass GNG? They are all primary sources...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Kadzi  (talk) 16:19, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Category: