Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Palm Peak Formation - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Nnadigoodluck (talk | contribs) at 23:30, 9 August 2020 (Palm Peak Formation: Closed as keep (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 23:30, 9 August 2020 by Nnadigoodluck (talk | contribs) (Palm Peak Formation: Closed as keep (XFDcloser))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. And rename to Palm Park Formation. (non-admin closure)Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 23:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Palm Peak Formation

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Palm Peak Formation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The formation name cannot be found at the cited Fossilworks source, nor at GEOLEX, nor with a Google or Google Scholar search. Kent G. Budge (talk) 23:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Makes sense to me. As the original nominator for deletion, I'm going to recommend the reviewing administrator close this with Rename as the decision. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 02:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Keep and rename. It's been a week and there seems to be complete consensus. As I understand the process, all that's needed is for an administrator to formalize the decision and then I can go rename the page. Administrators? --Kent G. Budge (talk) 16:56, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.