This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 05:59, 28 August 2020 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Women's Health/Archive 1) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:59, 28 August 2020 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Women's Health/Archive 1) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | Women's Health Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | Women Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Women's Health and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months  |
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
RfC: Adding sections on Psychological and emotional impact of health problems
Dear colleagues,
it has come to my attention from a recent study that there is still a long way to go to fix gender bias in Misplaced Pages's health information.
One of the important aspects is that WP:MEDMOS discourages, or does not mention, the potential psychological or emotional impact of certain medical conditions. We likely treat this too much from a narrow, medical perspective whereas readers on certain topics (as was mentioned in this recent study, e.g. abortion, menopause, vaginal dryness, but also cancer etc.) are likely interested in emotional and psychological impact too.
I will open an RfC at the talk page: here. I propose to treat this of course like any other aspect according to standard policies such as reliable sources, but I'm sure that for many of these aspects there is a wealth of research on the personal, emotional and psychological impact of diseases.
I would value your input on this important discussion (call cross-posted at WP:MED).
--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 10:07, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Current discussion on Kelly Preston talk page about notability of breast cancer as cause of death
- Discussion currently on the Kelly Preston talk page about whether or not to include her cause of death (breast cancer) in the infobox/is it "notable"? Please add your comments (Note - same not also posted on Wiki Project Women in Red) — ERcheck (talk) 23:08, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
RfC on defining violence in the lead of the Violence article
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Talk:Violence#RfC about the first and second sentences in the lead. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 04:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Categories: