This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Delfield (talk | contribs) at 11:51, 5 September 2020 (→Comments by other users). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:51, 5 September 2020 by Delfield (talk | contribs) (→Comments by other users)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Launebee
Launebee (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Launebee/Archive.
28 August 2020
– This SPI case is open.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Delfield (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
The account Delfield is clearly the latest episode in the string of sockpuppet accounts of Launabee. Launabee has been banned from editing articles on French academic institutions (. Delfield has been making edits to the English language Sciences Po article.
Evidence for sockpuppet-account:
Delfield has been following the content and language pattern of Launabee in a highly conspicuous way. Launabee was recognisable by continuously adding laudatory content about the law faculty of University of Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne. At the same time Launabee deleted positive content about Sciences Po and added derogatory content, specifically about the Sciences Po law school. While doing so, Launabee demonstrated a distinctly French-sounding English grammar and made mistakes with his wording.
Delfield fits into the exact language and content style of Launabee. Delfield even used some of the identical phrases as Launabee. The following are just a few examples of many:
Delfield writes: (https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sciences_Po&diff=974153935&oldid=966898648)
"2008, partly as an answer to the announcement of the creation of a "law school" in this new meaning in Sciences Po, University of Paris II Panthéon-Assas, created a "law college" (undergraduate level) and then a "law school" (graduate level) on top of its faculty of law to attract top students in France (see the disambiguation page, second meaning). It was widely reported in the media as the creation of a "way of excellence in law" for "brilliant students"."
Launabee wrote:
(https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Law_school,_college_of_law_or_academy_of_law_in_France&diff=974366825&oldid=706723576)
"Panthéon-Assas University being the top faculty of law in France, medias called even more this law college and school "way of excellence""
Both use the same citations. The same language.
If you compare the editing history of both accounts, the similarity is striking:
(https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Contributions/Launebee&offset=20171002173105&limit=500&target=Launebee) (https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Contributions/Delfield&offset=&limit=500&target=Delfield)
If more evidence is needed, I can easily give more examples. I take the nature of these investigations seriously. This is not a lighthearted accusation.
MePhisto (talk) 21:14, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Hello,
I copy/pasted a sentence from another WP article, quoting newspapers, that happens to be added by a banned account and it would be an evidence that I am that user? If sources say something, it makes sense several users would make similar edits.
MePhisto is a one-purpose account oriented on making advertisement on Science Po with other accounts (it is why I ended up making much edits on that page and asked for a protection https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_page_protection/Rolling_archive&diff=prev&oldid=920447245 ). I tried to talk to him on content in talk page and find a consensus, but he never once talked about content but only resorted to a "you have the same opinion than an other account, and are not a native-speaker either, so you are him and you should be banned" argument: https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Sciences_Po .
--Delfield (talk) 11:51, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: