Misplaced Pages

Talk:Invasion of the Cape Colony

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnomieBOT (talk | contribs) at 00:03, 16 September 2020 (Adding/updating {{OnThisDay}} for 2020-09-15. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OnThisDayTagger). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:03, 16 September 2020 by AnomieBOT (talk | contribs) (Adding/updating {{OnThisDay}} for 2020-09-15. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OnThisDayTagger)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Invasion of the Cape Colony article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Good articlesInvasion of the Cape Colony has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 22, 2015. (Reviewed version).
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Maritime / African / British / Dutch / European / Early Modern
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Maritime warfare task force
Taskforce icon
African military history task force
Taskforce icon
British military history task force
Taskforce icon
Dutch military history task force
Taskforce icon
European military history task force
Taskforce icon
Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconSouth Africa: African military history Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the African military history task force.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconNetherlands
WikiProject iconThis article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands
Note icon
A Netherlands Did you know article.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUnited Kingdom Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBritish Empire Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
A fact from Invasion of the Cape Colony appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 July 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: A record of the entry may be seen at Misplaced Pages:Recent additions/2015/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Invasion of the Cape Colony (1795).
Misplaced Pages
A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on September 15, 2017 and September 15, 2020.

Naval battle or infantry?

comment removed from article:

NOT A NAVAL OPERATION MORE INFANTRY THAN ANYTHING. The Major Gordon may have been killed or suicided, his widow selling Merino Sheep to Naval Captains Waterhouse & Kent for shipping to Australia in january 1797, the first Merinos to Australia. Keith Dawson Toowoomba Qld nanke@gil.com.au Ps there is doubt about the Gordon as Waterhouse's letter to Sir Joseph Banks says Colonel Gordon. Only death I can find is William Augustus Gordona Major, he died in March 1796. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.94.40.2 (talkcontribs)

Possibly a consequence of the French Revolution

Hearsay or fact? William, Prince of Orange traded the Dutch settlement at the Cape of Good Hope in return for protection of the Dutch royalty following fear of French-incited revolution by the Dutch commoners or, as happened, a Napoleonic invasion of the Netherlands. The British sent a naval force to present the terms of the exchange, but were met with resistance because the Dutch settlers had not yet received news warning of the contract from the Netherlands.

The suicidee William Gordon refered to in the article above was the person after whom Gordons Bay was named.

Potion 12:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

I have Heard also that it was the threat of French conquest of Holland that spurred Brittan to take the cape.

Orangutanlibrarian 08:26 12 March 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Orangutanlibrarian (talkcontribs) 18:30, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Tidy Up

As part of a push for a Good Topic I will be tidying up a version of this article in my userspace over the next week or so. I note that aside from vandalism there has been no serious activity on this page for some time, but if any one has concerns, questions or comments please do get in touch. I may also redirect this article to a new title reflecting the fact that it covers the whole of the invasion, not just the (very small) Battle of Muizenberg (which in any other context would barely be a skirmish). Best--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

I have now completed this tidy up, comprehensively expanding the article, completely resourcing it and making general improvements. I have also moved it - the article as it stood covered more than the minor skirmishing at Muizenberg anyway, and the new version covers the whole campaign. The redirect Battle of Muizenberg contains the article history for the article's previous incarnation. Any questions or comments, shoot them my way.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

And it came to pass

I lived within a stone's throw of Muizenberg for thirty years. There is no pass at Muizenberg. Fire up Google Earth and have a butcher's. The nature of the natural defensive position at Muizenberg is complex, with steep slopes to the west and an exposed sandy beach to the east. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Captainbeefart (talkcontribs) 11:13, 15 September 2017 (UTC)


Categories: