Misplaced Pages

User talk:Sysages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) at 08:26, 19 September 2020 (Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Sysages/Archive 1. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 08:26, 19 September 2020 by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Sysages/Archive 1. (BOT))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
This is Sysages's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
To report problems with Sysages' vandalism detection system, see User:Sysages/Issues.
"User talk:Jimbo Vales" redirects here. Jimbo Vales is a doppelgänger account, created to prevent impersonation of Jimbo Wales by anyone else.


Heads up

The recent edit you reverted from Bendy and the Ink Machine is false. None of the actors were in the game. The user who made that is adding incorrect information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.56.62.31 (talk) 17:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Removal of content on Rape in Islamic law

Sysages, I just gave my explanation on the talkpage. This seems to be a kneejerk reaction against IPs considering previous vandalism by another account went undetected for hours. 119.152.128.94 (talk) 22:13, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dan Fraga have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Misplaced Pages as a "soapbox" are against Misplaced Pages policy and not permitted; Misplaced Pages articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Misplaced Pages. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:39, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

I sometimes mistakenly identify a good edit as vandalism. Sorry about that. Please report problems about Sysages here. Sysages (talk | contribs) 04:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. I once made a mistake. Or a few dozen. Take care. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Mersh

What is Misplaced Pages:Mersh? I am not sure how it relates to what is on your user page. --Emir of Misplaced Pages (talk) 12:32, 22 August 2020 (UTC) (please Reply to icon mention me on reply; thanks!)

My userpage is intended as humor. According to my userpage, Misplaced Pages:Mersh is a place for editors to ask questions about Misplaced Pages. Sysages (talk | contribs) 02:53, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tagging

Hello, Sysages,

You are a new editor and shouldn't be tagging pages for deletion. And you definitely shouldn't re-tag a page after an admin or more experienced editor has removed the CSD tag. Persistence, in the face of disagreement, is not a virtue on Misplaced Pages. It can lead to a warning (which this is) and, eventually if it continues after a warning, it can result in a block. Please read over Criteria for Speedy Deletion and edit for a few more months before you start tagging pages for deletion. If you have questions, please visit the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz 06:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

I am not a new editor. I have made over 400 edits. Sysages (talk | contribs) 20:11, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

AIV report

Why did you make this vandalism report? There are no diffs showing vandalism, there are no warnings to the editor, and looking at their edit history, I see no reason for you to make this report out-of-the-blue. Schazjmd (talk) 22:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Technical non-redirect

Template:Technical non-redirect has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Soumya-8974 contribs 18:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

CSD

This is your last warning. If you continue to inappropriately tag pages for speedy deletion, as you did at , you will be blocked from editing. CaptainEek ⚓ 18:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

I am just trying to assume good faith. I do not inappropriately tag pages for deletion intentionally. Please report incorrect CSD tags at User:Sysages/Issues. Sysages (talk | contribs) 18:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – bradv🍁 18:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sysages (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not "not here to build an encyclopedia". According to my userpage, I am a good-faith user, which means I should not be blocked.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It seems that you are having a illogical unblock reason, since whatever on your User page is written by you it cannot reflect your faith-level. Check WP:USERPAGE for more info. I suggest you wait for about a month or more and see WP:Guide to appealing blocks and the blocking policy before appealing again. -- PythonSwarm 09:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Technical non-redirect

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a notice that Template:Technical non-redirect, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. -- PythonSwarm 08:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC)