Misplaced Pages

User talk:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Spartaz (talk | contribs) at 16:57, 2 January 2007 (→[]: update). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:57, 2 January 2007 by Spartaz (talk | contribs) (→[]: update)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) user - talk - contributions - email - desk - sandbox - status:  


Warning This user is on an administrative Wikibreak. Please do not leave messages wishing for this user to use their admin tools until further notice.
I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented.
  • If I post on your talk page, I will notice any replies posted there.
  • Unless you request otherwise, I will reply here to comments made here.
  • I will usually post a brief note on your talk page to let you know that I have replied, unless your talk page instructs me otherwise.
  • If you write a reply to me here, I may decide to move your text back to your talk page in an effort to keep the thread in one place.
  • If you are just pointing out something written to me elsewhere, edit here.
  • Such pointers are useful if you've written to a comment I made many days ago.
  • My user talk page is archived automatically by Werdnabot, so
  • To see older messages please view my archives.

Messages

Archives: The Basement  · My desk  · My Barnstars

A barnstar for you

The Original Barnstar
For being a helpful administrator, offering his services to those who need them, I award you the Original Barnstar. ST47Talk 15:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Pseudo-AFD question for RfA

You have a pseudo AFD at User:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington/Desk/AfD, that you used for posing a question in BostonMA's RfA. Another user there commented that this AFD page triggered a content filter on his computer. If you intend to repeat use of the question, could you create/find some similar AFD that wouldn't trigger a content filter? There ought to be one around that is equally challenging, but doesn't trigger content filters. GRBerry 15:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Dmcdevit

Er I think you misread my meaning and also what side in this dispute I'm on.  :-) --Spartaz 16:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC) Just to be clear this is your edit that I'm referring to

One revert is not equal to "edit-warring". Edit-warriors get blocked. Dmcdevit, certainly did not edit-war over the page. Your frequent assumptions of bad faith are waaay out of line. --Nearly Headless Nick 15:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Um, I'm getting stick for referring to some of those bringing the RFC as being vindictive, showing poor judgement amnd just being plain nasty. Are you sure you have the right editor? --Spartaz 16:57, 2 January 2007 (UTC)