This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Son of Somebody (talk | contribs) at 20:43, 2 January 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:43, 2 January 2007 by Son of Somebody (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Intellectual dishonesty is the advocacy of a position known to be false. Rhetoric is used to advance an agenda or to reinforce one's deeply held beliefs in the face of overwhelming contrary evidence.
The terms intellectually dishonest and intellectual dishonesty are often used as rhetorical devices in a debate; the label invariably frames an opponent in a negative light. It is an obfuscatory way to say "you're lying".
See also
- In specific fields:
- Anti-intellectualism
- Epistemic virtue
- Ethics
- Honesty
- Plagiarism
- Pseudoskepticism
- Rigour
- Scientific skepticism
- Scientism
- Self-deception
- Truthiness
 | This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |