Misplaced Pages

talk:Articles for deletion/Rajkumar Kanagasingam/Archive - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for deletion | Rajkumar Kanagasingam

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lahiru k (talk | contribs) at 18:24, 4 January 2007 (formatting the picky section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:24, 4 January 2007 by Lahiru k (talk | contribs) (formatting the picky section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

References (off-line media archives)

English media archives

  • Sinhala media archives
  • Tamil media archives

Rajsingam 14:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

http://www.dailynews.lk/2002/03/08/featureslead.html

http://www.dailynews.lk/2002/05/16/fea01.html

http://www.dailynews.lk/2005/01/19/fea03.html

http://www.dailynews.lk/2005/12/06/fea02.htm

Are featured works by kanagasingam.Bakaman 17:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Massive voting campaign carried out by User:Rajsingam

Rajsingam (talk · contribs) has takan a massive voting campaign indirectly on this AFD. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ 16:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Oh please. What a load of bullshit. 5 people = massive? I think you need to take a break and stop attacking User:Rajsingam. — Wackymacs 17:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC)


This itself reveals their sinister AFD scam and now they are shouting when they fail. Why some one else put the AFD tag, another one is alarming about the voting campaign. I disclosed openly on the deletion discussion page and informed the known editors the sinister AFD tag on my article, but I never requested to vote for me. I kindly request the Administration to check the history of the recent Talk:Anton Balasingham which victimised me. Rajsingam 17:30, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Nah, I don't want to attack on him because he is not notable to me, and mind you that 5 votes are very considerable size in AFDs. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ 17:52, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
As he said, he wasn't asking for a 'Keep' vote at all - I could have voted for a Delete for all he knew. There is nothing wrong about notifying other Wikipedians about an AFD. I really don't see what your point in this "Massive voting campaign" claim is. You obviously can't accept that, at the moment, there are more 'Keep' votes than 'Delete' ones. — Wackymacs 17:57, 4 January 2007

(UTC)

Requesting that other Wikipedians take a look at an article the may have an opinion about, without attempting to influence the particular vote ("Come to the AfD and vote Keep please") is not inappropriate. In fact it is helpful in insuring that the AfD debate has adequate discussion. And if calling "5" massive isn't hyperbole, I don't know what is. Tarinth 18:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you Tarinth! - at least someone has some sense and sanity here. :-) — Wackymacs 18:12, 4 January 2007 (UTC)