Misplaced Pages

Template talk:Sexual orientation

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Flyer22 Frozen (talk | contribs) at 21:55, 22 October 2020 (What are you doing? This helps people find the archived discussions.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:55, 22 October 2020 by Flyer22 Frozen (talk | contribs) (What are you doing? This helps people find the archived discussions.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sexual orientation template.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
WikiProject iconLGBTQ+ studies Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconSexology and sexuality Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
This template was considered for deletion on 12 August 2005. The result of the discussion was "'No consensus'".
Categories: