Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Siddiqui (talk | contribs) at 05:26, 5 January 2007 (→Your input requested). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

Hello, NadirAli, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! I am Deepu Joseph. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
• Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
• Provide an Edit summary
• Take a look at Consensus of standards. It is always wise to read the talk page of an existing article before making major changes on it. Even then, I typically ask if anyone minds that I make a change. Very often they do! ;-)
• Create a User page

Re:How do I post edited Articles.

I'm not exactly sure, but you have contributed to a few articles as seen here. Your edits are indeed being saved. I'm guessing that perhaps instead of clicking the "save page" button below, you might have clicked the "show preview" button? Is there any special article on which your edits were not saved? Did you check the article's history (by clicking the history button on top)? Perhaps someone must have reverted your edits. Please let me know. -- thunderboltz

Your posting to the Village Pump (proposals) page

Hi Nadirali,

Thanks for your posting about Star Trek and Star Wars to the Village Pump (porposals) page. Unfortunately the page you posted to is not an appropriate place for discussing the content of these articles. Please bring up your concerns on the articles' talk pages (i.e. Talk:Star Wars and Talk:Star Trek) instead. Also, when you add a message to any talk page, please sign your comment by putting ~~~~ (that's four tilde characters) at the end; this automatically gets expanded to your signature and a timestamp. Thanks, Gwernol 15:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars articles

Please stop changing the category titles for the Star Wars films from "science fantasy" to "science fiction". Lucas has stated in many interviews that the films are not science fiction and this has been accepted in recent years by the general media. Sources for some of these can be found in the A New Hope article. Thank you. The Filmaker 18:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

• Please, the fact of Star Wars "science fantasy" category has been voted through on a number of FACs regarding the prequel trilogy. All prequel trilogy films are now featured articles, they are considered to be the best on Misplaced Pages. If you wish to dispute the category, do so in the talk page of one of the films instead of simply changing the article to your liking. On Misplaced Pages we work by consensus, and the majority of editors believe that Star Wars is "science fantasy". However, if you have suitable reasoning as to why it should be changed, please state it in the talk page and we may agree with you. Thank you. The Filmaker 15:48, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Dont forget to add Saudi Arabia's flag

Thank you for contacting. I have been to Saudi Arabia. You are absolutely right about ‎their behavior with Pakistanis. Personally, I think all Islamic scripts should be removed ‎from all the flags like Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan. And OIC could ‎pressurize them. When someone desecrates these flags, Islamic scripts on them are also ‎desecrated.‎ Szhaider 16:52, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Your Star Trek concerns

Sir, I have read and noted your concerns on the Star Trek main article talk page. I am not going to call you a "moron" outright, although I may just question your motives in this case. This is not a reflection on your intelligence nor your capacity for rational thought (which it would be if I did call you a moron), but rather a rebuke against your provocative statements on that talk page which are clearly calculated to incite.

Star Trek is science fiction because it involves a narrative setting which differs from the present-day real world in terms of technology and futurology. The futurology aspect is "scientific" because the narrative specifically invokes scientific advances and discoveries as the motive force behind the development of society to the state seen in the stories. That is, economic and religious factors are negligible or absent factors in the narrated future as depicted in Star Trek; the characters do the things they do because they have more advanced scientific and technological knowledges, resources and tools than we do in this present day. This is axiomatically "science fiction".

You have - fairly, in my opinion - cited examples of storylines and narrative events which appear to have no scientific basis, eg Charlie Evans. However those things, whilst better classified as fantasy in their own right, do not alter the classification of the whole as science fiction. The characters in the episode Charlie X travel in a starship and do many other things which are science-based fiction.

You provocatively cite something which clearly irritates you personally, being the outrageous claim of Trekkies that the cell phone was invented thanks to Star Trek. Bringing up this one example - which is refutable by simply pointing to Get Smart or to Dick Tracy - diminishes your attempt to puncture Star Trek's scientific credentials, because you specifically failed to refute it. You merely trashed it, which is not a valid argument. It is well documented that the scientists and inventors of today have found inspiration in the fiction of the past, of which Star Trek is a part. The enthusiasm of Trekkies to promote the importance of their own in this process is perfectly understandable, and should not cause you any unease. If you don't agree with such fan statements, then good for you. I also think the importance of Star Trek in the development of late-20th century technology is overstated - the Apollo Program had many times the degree of influence.

I am disturbed by this statement of yours -

- because your frustration (at being unable to engage Star Trek fans in a debate) clearly blinded you to the fact that you were the first to give a lecture. If you wanted answers, you should have asked a short and constructive question instead of sprinkling your lecture with merely rhetorical questions. "Where's the science in that?" is not a question seeking information, it is a rebuke phrased as a question and will usually not encourage meanignful answers.

This statement was buried in your lecture: I'd like someone to answer what Star Trek has to do with science at all. I conclude here by saying, I hope you now have a good answer, and that you can live with it. Darcyj 13:04, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

It was not my intention at all to provoke any Trekkies or to trash Star Trek in any way.(The only trashing it deserves is it is exagerrating the "science" in it or better "abusing scientific terms and concepts" as Dr Micheal Wong puts it.).I only provided a long list of examples,so my point is understood better and not rebuffed as a "lecture". True,Star Trek may have science in it but the magical elements are too significant to go unnoticed,(as I stated almost every episode and not just charlie X has it)which is why it should be classified as science fiction/fantasy. The "unease" that I have is that people(especially gullable people) who are not too well educated in science and mathamatics will start precieving Star Trek to be reality as Trekkies always promote it to be.I believed all this much before I even stumbled accross Dr Wong's page.(Whom by the way has recieved death threats and threats of injuries from Trekkies for the things he proves). I never said Trekkies are not allowed to promote their enthusiasm.Trekkies can call themselves Bush haters for all I care.But crossing the line is where they try to impose their beliefs that Star Trek is "science" or "the future"(thus misguiding people) or that "Star Trek rocks compared to Star Wars"(That's a POV by the way).Give me a break. Please you spelled meaningful as meanignful.So before checking others' minor spelling mistakes,please check your own.Nadirali 00:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Nadirali (just erase my statement from the Star Trek talk page if it still "disturbs" you)Thanks.

Reply

Thanks a lot for your message. You are free to edit any page, however, discussing major edits is always a good idea. As for your talk page, it is better to archive talk page contents. See WP:ARCHIVE to learn how to do that. After archiving talk page contents, you can remove old messages from your talk page.

Welcome back, and I hope you will have a productive time in Misplaced Pages. Thanks. --Ragib 01:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:supporting the removal of the refferences of the Indus

Thank you very much. Just what I expected from you. Thanks again. Szhaider 18:14, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Re

Regarding this message, I'm a bit confused. I haven't posted any message to you about this. If you were referring to this message, note that it wasn't on your talk page, and wasn't directed to you. Thanks. --Ragib 05:32, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm too busy to go through the messages between Kumarnator and you, but a great way of stopping someone from messaging you is to *not respond to it*. Of course, if it is related to editing in an article, responding to it is recommended, but if you feel someone is sending you a message without any purpose, the best way is to refrain from responding to it. Thanks. --Ragib 04:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

you seem to be confused....

It seems that you are basing your "facts" on only geographic techinicalities.....For example the Assyrians came form the Arab Penisiula, but they are not Arab.....Just because some of the Indus may have sretched over pakistani land( which is rightfully indian) it doesnt mean that the indus is "home" to pakistan, it just means that the INDUS encompassed some land that many years later, in 1947, to be accurate shifted away and created some new country( pakistan). Secondally, you have mentioned that I used the word "pussy", to atleast 3 users. As usual, this was a Dr spin from you to try and make me look like some evil, stupid maniac!!! Though the people can see through you!!!Get a life, you're so pathetic!!!! Kumarnator 02:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

wow kumernator, I didn't know "the people" have X-ray vision like Superman-LOL

Regarding Balochistan Conflict

You may have your opinion about the issue but thats what POV is. Misplaced Pages is not about representing POV of Balochistan people or Pakistani Govt. We need a NPOV approach for the article and what that user has done, isn't valid according to wikipedia rules. He/she may discuss changes, try to convert an article to NPOV but can't replace it with a POV essay. Misplaced Pages is not about essays.voldemortuet 22:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Agreed that wikipedia should stay neutral on the issue.However the fact is that dozens have been killed at the hands of the army and that's what needs to be put on wikipedia'Nadirali 01:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Nadirali

Moving a conversation to this page

Please stop editing your reply on my talk archive page. Please don't post on my user talk archive page, as it doesn't become available for other users to read.

I don't know why you felt the need to come in and say anything to me about your warning against the corrupting forces on Misplaced Pages, or about how South Asians and Arabs are conflated in many Western minds, and portrayed negatively. I really don't have any concern about your issue with corruption on Misplaced Pages, I just mentioned that your words and tone seem like you are on a crusade. I referred to your rhetoric as nationalistic because you have said things about Indians and Bangladeshi editors' nationalities being an impedance to their seeing the truth, or words to that effect. I don't have a problem distinguishing South Asian culture or language from Arab culture or language, and I don't have any bigotry toward South Asians (two of my very good friends are from India - one is a Gujarati Shi'ite Muslim, one is a Bengali Hindu).

Before you correct me on my statements above, let me acknowledge that I probably got it all wrong on both counts. Please grant me the right to be wrong, just this once.

If you want to continue conversing with me, please let's do it on your talk page. I probably won't respond to any more talk about corruption or nationalism though, because I don't find them very interesting topics, and I definitely won't respond to anything you post on my talk pages. Thanks, Erielhonan 01:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

I wont respond to this till maybe tommorrow.Got a history assignment to finish.Due Wednesday.74.98.241.189 02:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Nadirali

Response to Erielhonan

Allright,I'll respond to the points you have made one by one. "Please stop editing your reply on my talk archive page.Please don't post on my talk archive page,as it doesnt become available for other readers to read." For your information,if I had no problem accessing your talk page and being able to see all the previous conversations that have taken place,I really don't see why another user would have a problem in finding them.Unless you're trying to suggest they have less common sense than me.

"I don't know why you felt the need to come in and say anything about your warning against corrupting forces on wikipedia ,or about how south asians and Arabs are conflated in western minds and portrayed negatively. Well ironically enough,I didn't know(and still don't know) why you felt the need to come in and say anything to me about violating the rules. Me doing that would be a loss for me,and I personally don't see how that would harm you in anyway at all.

"I just mentioned your words and tone seem like you are on a crusade." I'm really sorry that my tone sounded like I was on a 'crusade',just as I am sorry that anyone who is involved in anti-corruption committies and happen to share the same tone as me sound that they're on a crusade.

"I referred to your rhetoric as nationlistic because you have said things about Indians and Bangladeshi editors' nationalities being an impendance to their seeing the truth,or words to that effect." Then by your logic,my concern about too many police officers here in Canada being white and bullying non-white teenagers(particularly black)somehow makes me a nationalist. See nationalism here or here.http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/nationalism No harm in maintaining your vocabulary.

"I dont have a problem distinguishing South Asian culture or language from Arab culture or language,and I don't have any biogotry towards South Asians." First off,I didn't know South Asians spoke one language or shared a common culture.Feel free to edit any SA articles that mention South Asia consisting of many languages and cultures or nations.I don't remember saying you had a "bigotry" towards South Asians .I must be suffering from memory loss.I have a doctors appointment on Sunday.I'll ask him to add a check for memory loss on his check-up list.

"Before you correct me on my statements above,let me acknowledge that I probably got it all wrong on both counts.Please grant me the right to be wrong,just this once." Before asking others to grant you the "right to be wrong",I suggest you allow them the same right,such as allowing me to be wrong about my user page being my own.

"If you want to continue conversing with me,please let's do it on your talk page.I probably won't respond to any more talk about corruption or nationalism though,because I don't find them very interesting topics." Actually I'm not very interested in a conversing with a person I never started talking to in the first place,but agree to limit it to my talk page if it must go on. I too,won't respond to anymore talk on my user page not being my own or deleting content from my user page,or even the subject of nationalism that I never brought up in the first place as I dont find them very interesting topics. I hope that answers everything. Nadirali 04:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Nadirali

Like I said, you win. I do want to point out (no need to reply here or anywhere else) that when I use the word "language" without a definite article I am referring to language as a group noun, not a count noun. For instance, "South Asian language" (referring to the languages that originate in South Asia) v. "the Gujarati language" (referring to a specific language). It's tricky I know, but it makes perfect sense if you think about it.

Also, please don't post to my talk page anymore unless it's on a completely unrelated issue (like an article we both have edited). I would like to be done with this conversation, so feel free to have your last words but please do it on this page and not on mine. Thanks. Erielhonan 06:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC) It's good to know the person on the right side always comes out the winner.Regards.Nadirali 16:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Nadirali

Advice

I suggest that you stop responding to Kumarnator. The discussions lead to nowhere other than mud-slinging and personal attacks. Thank you. --Ragib 08:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Just when I was having a good time with him.But I agree it leads to nowhere and never did.If he only stopped messaging me all the time,it would have stopped a long time ago.Nadirali 15:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Nadirali

Hi Nadir

Nadir thanx for message,my big brother name is also Nadir Ali. good to know that mother is sindhi i bet she is must be good mother ,well mother are always good,but being mother with sufism from roots is kinda awesome, u must be getting what i am trying to say.Lets do some thing good for mother Sindh.i offten watch some pages, i feel difficulty here,it is kinda new to me being here and working and still i have not checked ,what one user can do here and can not Do.

khalidkhoso

Dear Nadir Thanx for message again.u said i called ur mother suif? no u can read i did not call her Sufi. i said as she is sindh she is having roots in sufi-ism,wel my self i am not sufi neither but i like it's idealogy ,i am myself a sunni too but as you see peoples around you(specially in sindh,big saint like sachal,Sami,Latif Sarkar),you just start thing these are right they never hurt any one.i never seen peoples fighting in name of religion(except karachi,it is not sindhi dominated area).I belive religion is relation between you and your God and i think no buddy have right to argue you becacuse it is you and him.if that makes me sufi then ok,but i pratice as sunni wahabi. when you visited hyderabad last time? i will some more topics in indus river,i need your support becasue this time you will fight with your own peoples,beacuse as there is no water in delata of indus river,so i will add it indus river and i know many punjabi user will try to remove it as they doing in Akber Bugti page.

Regards

9 December 

User:khalidkhoso:khalidkhoso

Check this out bro

We share a lot of the same views. Please see my page and visit the forum I have linked to. Its a site dedicated to making people aware and getting them to recognise the history and identity of Pak. The Admin of the site is looking for a moderating team. If you want to, you can make that. looking forward to hear from ya. Unre4L —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Unre4L (talk • contribs) 03:19, 9 December 2006 (UTC).

Sorry. Thought I posted the link. Here it is anyway. http://www.pakhub.info/ I plan on donating to admin for a domain for it next week. Unre4L

2 sides of the story need to be heard

I think you need to heremy side of the story before taking sides.Personal attacks have been launched against me by the same users who reported me along with attempting to intimidate user:Saddiqui by making threatening comments. They have also vandalized my comments once and have been trolling with there provokitive comments non-stop.They have also accussed me of being a "maddrassa student".If anyone's been trolling it's them.Nadirali 04:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)Nadirali

I'm not taking sides. It doesn't matter if people have been levying personal attacks against you; you still are not allowed to attack others. If people are attacking you, warn them using {{npa}}, {{npa2}}, {{npa3}}, and {{npa4}}, or {{civil1}} and {{civil2}}. -- tariqabjotu 04:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Your site is not working

Hello Nadir hw ru today Yar ,i try to open ur site but it is not working i do not know why?can u help me in this regard .i was using it from office? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Khalidkhoso (talk • contribs) 04:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC).

Khalid Im good thanx.I will be unable to respond to you for now as I have been blocked as a punishment for violating the wikipedia:incivility and wikipedia:personal attacks rules.Once the block is lifted,I will message you and help you open the site.Please note that the government of Pakistan has blocked access to the site for political disputes with the world Sindhi institute.However there still is a way for you to access the site from Pakistan.Once my block is lifted,I will hlep you access the site.Until then see you.Nadirali 05:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Nadirali

Hey Nadir ,i opened ur site with www.ghostproxy.com ,it by pass local proxy.i do nt knw why ur site was blocked by admin here,anways,it was nice work by u on that site.ok sure will be waiting for ur response.How can help U ,in sindhiworld forum?lemme knw if i can i wll sure.hey wat is ur mailing address?

Just email world Sindhi institute with the questions you have.I just hope it's safe as the Pak government doesnt want people visiting the site,but if you can visit the safely that's fine,just email them your questions.Thankyou.Nadirali 15:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Nadirali

Hi agin Nadir, i though u r blocked and can not replay anyways Welcome Back.

Question

Hi Nadirali, I saw the discussion at Talk:History_of_India#indian_hijacking_of_Pakistan.27s_history and posted a question for you which I'll hope you will answer. Thanks a lot Gizza 06:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Empire

What would the error be? The Filmaker 21:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

• Thanks for letting me know. The Filmaker 19:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Portals

Hi! Portals are actually alternate Main Pages on wikipedia. They contain content similar to the wikipedia front page. But unlike the main page, portals are devoted to a specific topic. Hence they contain pictures, articles, "Did you know"s, etc. on that topic alone. See this page for all the info about portals. Ping me if you have any further questions.--thunderboltz 00:37, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

re: Anti-vandal programs

Hello again! Thanks for the congratulations. (You can call me Deepu by the way Template:Smi) Reg. anti-vandal programs : Actually, adding the vandal sniper template to your userpage does not protect it from vandal attacks. Vandal sniper is a program that you can download to your computer. When it is run, it scans through all the recent changes and list out those that the program thinks might be a case of vandalism. It also gives you an option to revert these changes easily.

So, in short, those people who have the vandal sniper template on their user pages are only saying that they run the Vandal sniper program and will revert any vandalism immediately using it. Their userpages remain as vulnerable as any other. I think you get the idea. The template is just a graphic, and does nothing. I recommend you try out Vandal sniper or the anti-vandal tool to understand better.--thunderboltz 13:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the guides.I have been able to upload the script for the anti-vandal tool to my userpage and it seems to work just fine.Thanks alot for the info! Nadirali 01:54, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

where did you lived during visit in hyderabad

Dear Nadir ,there are many sindhi communities in orkut ,u can join those but i do not know about other communities if you know any let me know for sure I will join it along with you.

Hope every thing is fine with you. Where did you lived in Hyderabad during your visit?

Khalidkhoso 04:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Nadir ,i do not like MQM any shape, now these days there having flags in Larkana city can you believe this? .You know why? because they have new Slogan "we are sindhi" but who does nothing for sindh.on other side they still planning to broke her to into parts making new state "Jinnah Pora". Yeah it is offending for sure

Khalidkhoso 04:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Cha Hal Ahin(how are you,sindhi).

Yeah Hyderabad Cantonment is beautiful, telling you one more thing .it is expensive area too because it is having Sadder Market inside it, if you visit sadder market ,i believe you will change idea that Hyderabad cantonment is beautiful.Yeah residence area of Army officer is beautiful, it is not in Hyderabad it is every where. I mean take example of Karachi, which is Most expensive area of Karachi? "DHA" "Defense Housing Society" it is under control of army. they are also allot bangles in sadder Karachi. Do you speak Sindhi?

Sadain Gud

Khalidkhoso 05:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Nadir why not create Wiki_Sindhi(sort of community working for sindhi pages and related topics) ,how this sounds like :P

Khalidkhoso 05:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree with that sindhi are weak But why? . we should look for reasons it is beacuse they are un-educated,simple in nature,Sufi in religion,resources occupied by others,fighting with each other,killing in name of honour,lake of information .read history even Moen-jo-daro ppls did not made any weapon in there time how they make now? what i am trying to say is they are Much sufi in nature.They are divide as hindu sindhi,muslim sindhi(then Barouch(different tribes fighting for power Jatoi,Magsi,Bugti,Khosa,Laghari,Mastoi,Mirani,etc inside them stil are they divided as take expample of Magsi Shambhani,Bhutani,Sakhani) etc...,jamot Tunio,Sommro,Sayyal,Bhatti,Thebo,Dahar). How you expect to be in power with this? and read my profile i am Balouch oriented Sindhi we called as Barouch (Balouch but Sindhi) Khalidkhoso 06:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi Nadir i have post my request on Sindhi_Wikipedian ,if they would not change that Flag i will do it ,have You seen Muhajir Wikipedian. it is same like sindhi_wikipedian no change between both tags, I will put Ajruk On that flag that is Identity of Sindhi's

Khalidkhoso 08:53, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello Bro ,i removed Flag from sindhi wikipedian and made some editing.i will make picture here of my ajruk and upload it.but these days it is little bit hard to do.i will do it after Eid,till then Happy Eid "Eid Mubark" ,Happy New Year. Khalidkhoso 04:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi Nadirali

I'm not sure if you're familiar with user:Tigeroo, but he might need some help staying focused and being neutral in an article that we're editing on together called Decline of Buddhism in India. I'm not entirely aware of the issues, but there has been an edit war going on that I would like to stop. Could you talk to him please? Thanks.NinaEliza (talk • contribs • logs) 18:18, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Sounds good. Have fun!NinaEliza (talk • contribs • logs) 23:55, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice however if you please talk a look around at the edit's discussions and talk pages maybe you can see I am trying to be amicable. It is hard to come to agreement when the chages being inserted are blankings, removal of cited materials, unexplained etc. I could solve issues if the other party was discussing things. I have not gone to 3RR and have even not brought 3RR against the other party involved to keep things amicable. If you would like to mediate the dispute, it would be welcome.--Tigeroo 06:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Proposals

Someone else pretty much already had the same idea.

• Prequel trilogy (Star Wars)
• Original trilogy (Star Wars)
• Star Wars

The Filmaker 14:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Happy Eid,Happy New Year

Dear NadirAli,
HAppy New Year,Eid,Eid Mubarak,chand Rat to You and Your Family with Love .Sadin Gud,Allah Hafiz KhalidKhoso

IVC

Dear Nadirali, project templates are supposed to go only on talk pages. I hope that helps. Eid Mubarak and Happy New Year! deeptrivia (talk) 00:49, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for letting the template off the article and on to the talk page, Nadirali. I don't think I have anything else to say about your other concerns. Regards, deeptrivia (talk) 02:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Great. You and User:Unre4L have similar concerns. Parallel discussions are being carried out on different pages, which is not very efficient. Let's discuss this on a single project page. Maybe at Misplaced Pages talk:Notice board for India-related topics if you don't mind. Regards, deeptrivia (talk) 03:05, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Okay, please suggest a neutral page, where a larger number of editors can participate in the discussion. I am talking about User:Unre4L's discussion on Talk:History_of_India#Ancient_Indian_to_be_changed_into_Ancient_Pakistani., and about letting the Pakistan template stay on the talk page. Thanks, deeptrivia (talk) 03:46, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions made on December 31 2006 to Indus Valley Civilization

Please mark your reverts as such; please use edit comments

History of Pakistan and Pakistani nationalism

Can you please keep an eye on these articles. These articles are being rewritten by Indians from Hindutva perspective. Siddiqui 04:17, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

I have rewritten Pakistani nationalism by removing Indian propaganda. Can you pleaase review my changes and try to keep this version. I am hoping more Pakistanis contributors will pool thier efforts.

Siddiqui 14:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

saving some templates for inaccurate and/or POV articles

This article may be unbalanced toward certain viewpoints. Please improve the article by adding information on neglected viewpoints, or discuss the issue on the talk page.

This article's factual accuracy is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "NadirAli" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2006) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Template:Totallydisputed

The neutrality of this section is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Re: discussion page

Thanks for pointing this out. I highly appreciate that. I will take time to read it entirely before participating with my views. Thanks again. Szhaider 20:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

what would jesus do?

wasn't listed on the afd, therefore its fair game.--D-Boy 13:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

• You're not supposed to take off the tag until the vote has been passed.Removing that tag before a vote is passed is considered vandalizm.Leave the tag alone.Nadirali 16:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

watch me!--D-Boy 13:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

LOL I think you're a little too late for that.Nadirali 14:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Disruption

You're still reverting without attempting to build consensus. Actually, you're doing it in contravention of the consensus. That is disruption, and if it continues you won't be able to continue to edit. Please stop, and make positive contributions instead. There are much, much better places to put your efforts into. - Taxman 13:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

This is not a neutral way to handle this issue.They keep reverting my changes and vandalizing the tag I place on the discussion page.Nadirali 14:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, We don't really know each other, but we had traded some postings on the Urdu language. Anyway, I seem to be having problems on this page with some POV warriors from here—warriors like this and this. Anyway, if you have the time, you might consider visiting the page every now and then and restoring order; however, beware of this. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 21:27, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Modest Barnstar

No harm done. Cheers! Thanks for your attempt to keep the wikipedia free from 'bad words' as well as for your courtesy and diligent attention to your bot's actions.

Your input requested

Can you please check following page where Indian contributors have made accusation against Pakistani contributors. http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents Siddiqui 02:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

The page http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents

check heading "Meatpuppetry and tag-team edit-warring" it is the middle of the page. You can also search this page.

Siddiqui 05:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)