This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KP Botany (talk | contribs) at 04:16, 6 January 2007 (→Chelsea Opera deletion concern: Just because something else isn't broke, doesn't the first thing doesn't need fixed.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:16, 6 January 2007 by KP Botany (talk | contribs) (→Chelsea Opera deletion concern: Just because something else isn't broke, doesn't the first thing doesn't need fixed.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Hello, Broadwaydad, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - crz crztalk 20:00, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Chelsea Opera deletion concern
Hello, I have a concern about a possible, threatened deletion for Chelsea Opera Organization. It seems the most important objection as been lack of references. However there are several footnotes that are verified nicely this opera company and their work. Their website is first rate. However as I look around the Misplaced Pages site, I find many small opera companies that do not list any references, and some not even their own website, yet they have not had any threats of deletion. Example is the Muddy River Opera Company that I reasearched and the Lancaster Opera company that has been listed by another Misplaced Pages contributer in trying to get information as to why this deserving group is even being consideref for deletion. They are young, but well supported by the public, and New York higher ups, in their work with young people and the USO care packages and other public service endeavors. This is exactly the type of small company that Should be part of Wikipedea. It seems to be a concern also of unfair treatment by one of the Editors of Misplaced Pages and I hope you can perhaps step in and bring some reason and clarification to the ongoing discussions. Thank you sincerely,Broadwaydad 06:28, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not taking any sides, but may I ask just who the editor giving "unfair treatment" is? Acalamari 19:18, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Yes, Mr. Darcy has claimed that we need certain things done that doesn't seem to be required on other pages of groups such as this one. Such as references and more. But I will move ahead and see if we can get past this with a bit of work and trying to clean up this article. Broadwaydad 01:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, instead of fighting Mr. Darcy, who is correct. please take the time to tag all the articles that don't meet the standards, so they, too, may be fixed. The references and more are required of all articles, and there's no need to get past them not being required of others, because they are indeed. Mr. Darcy is only one person, if you're finding articles that need attention, tag them, please. Thank you. KP Botany 04:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)