This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 193.154.194.38 (talk) at 07:36, 8 January 2007 (Change my contributions). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:36, 8 January 2007 by 193.154.194.38 (talk) (Change my contributions)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Monday 23 December 19:53 UTC Welcome to my talk page. |
New Year
I hope that you have a wonderful New Year and will party all night long. If you don't celebrate New year at this time well then happy early or late New Year and I still advise that you have a good time tonight!!! ¿Why1991 22:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC) |
Barnstar
The Original Barnstar | ||
I am happy to give you this for being a perfect wikipedian and for the founding of wikia. Great job! Sir James Paul 21:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
If you make a comment please put it on my talk page. God bless you and give you a happy new year!!!! --Sir James Paul 21:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Prod vs. Redirect
Thanks Angela for changing that to a redirect. Is there a standard way to request that? Or should I just do it? I know how to do redirects, so is that what should normally be done in cases like this? Originally I was told to request speedy deletes. Then I was told that speedy deletion does not cover that type of cleanup, and to use prod. Now what you say about needing to keep the history (which makes a whole lot of sense to me) sounds like the best idea yet. But the one good thing about prod is that it gives people warning to fix it, talk about it, or whatever. Is there a prod for redirect? Or does the {{cocktail-micro-talk}} pretty much do an adequate job of warning. Maybe with just a bit of a wording tweak to indicate it will become a redirect instead of outright deletion? I would really appreciate your input. I want to do this the best way possible, and there will be a lot of these cocktail-related articles coming up for deletion within the next few weeks as our cleanup project winds down. Thanks! --Willscrlt 23:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for responding on my talk page. I will go ahead and do that from now on. I think I will go ahead and update the template to indicate that is how we will be handling things like that in the future. I appreciate your input. Happy new year! --Willscrlt 23:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Rothwell Temperance Band
I notice that you have redeleted this page that I just restored. I did this because I was approached by the creator for a reason why I had deleted it. The article states that the band are All England Champions, so I restored it to allow the creator to demonstrate notability, and I suggested how this might be done.
I know you are an experienced and careful editor, so I'm not suggesting that you change your decision (esp as I am a previous deleter). I just felt that there appeared to be a reasonable chance that the creator could demonstrate notability. jimfbleak 16:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Restore«Biparentalness»
Angela, can you please rstore «Biparentalness»? I see no reason to delete it and I had no chance to discuss its deletion. Thank you. --Dejudicibus 19:53, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- It was deleted since no one objected to the prod. The term doesn't seem to exist outside of Misplaced Pages . Angela. 20:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- I restored the article per WP:DRV#Proposed deletions and proposed that Dejudicibus moves it to Bigenitorialità. Quick check tells me there is enough material to let him work on it. ~ trialsanderrors 03:03, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
In recognition
The Purple Star | ||
Given in recognition for having one of the most vandalised user pages. Timrollpickering 03:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC) |
Change my contributions
Hi Angela! Is it possible to change these contributions of my IP to User:ceväü? Please do so. Thanks. Greetings. 193.154.194.38 07:36, 8 January 2007 (UTC)