This is a combined display of all logs except the patrol, review, tag and thanks logs:
- Who performed the action – enter their name without prefix under "Performer".
- The page or user affected by an action – enter the page or user name (prefixed with "User:") under "Target".
- 16:03, 26 January 2011 Toddst1 talk contribs protected West Ridge Academy (indefinite) (indefinite) (this page is a magnet for disruption) (hist)
- 19:34, 9 September 2009 Zzuuzz talk contribs protected West Ridge Academy (expires 19:34, 9 October 2009 (UTC)) (expires 19:34, 9 October 2009 (UTC)) (disruption from sockpuppets) (hist)
- 05:01, 30 August 2009 Toddst1 talk contribs protected West Ridge Academy (expires 05:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC)) (expires 05:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC)) (Edit warring / Content dispute) (hist)
- 21:44, 8 June 2009 William M. Connolley talk contribs protected West Ridge Academy (expires 21:44, 22 June 2009 (UTC)) (expires 21:44, 22 June 2009 (UTC)) (the usual) (hist)
- 04:52, 8 June 2009 Good Olfactory talk contribs removed protection from West Ridge Academy (due to complaints of my involvement in attempts to stop edit war) (hist)
- 22:22, 7 June 2009 Good Olfactory talk contribs protected West Ridge Academy (expires 22:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)) (expires 22:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)) (persistent disruptive edits by anonymous editors) (hist)
- 03:44, 19 March 2009 Good Olfactory talk contribs removed protection from West Ridge Academy (in light of the circumstances (anon was banned user), there is no apparent need to protect right now) (hist)
- 03:00, 19 March 2009 Good Olfactory talk contribs changed protection settings for West Ridge Academy (expires 03:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC)) (expires 03:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC)) (change to full protection to give parties a chance to discuss--rolled back to last version by anon editor) (hist)
- 02:56, 19 March 2009 Good Olfactory talk contribs protected West Ridge Academy (expires 02:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)) (expires 02:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)) (Edit warring / Content dispute: things are getting a bit ridiculous on the page with anonymous editors refusing to acknowledge the need for reliable sources; continual reversions, etc.) (hist)