Misplaced Pages

Talk:Croatia–Hungary relations

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Croatia–Hungary relations article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Former good articleCroatia–Hungary relations was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 12, 2012Good article nomineeListed
March 19, 2020Good topic candidateNot promoted
May 22, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconCroatia Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconHungary Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconInternational relations Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGuild of Copy Editors
WikiProject iconThis article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on March 28, 2012.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Copyvio

Much of the article, actually all except the lead, is a copyvio of this article's English language summary - therefore I'll replace that text right away.--Tomobe03 (talk) 21:59, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Croatia–Hungary relations/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 00:05, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Minor details

I've done a thorough reading of the article and have gone through most of the sources, and the article looks to be sound. I appreciate the breadth of topics that are included in this article that go beyond just the basic politics and history. There are just a few minor details that need to be sorted out before I can pass this article:

  • I believe there should be a name for the source that is given in Ref #8. If anything, the name of the website should be given.
  • I don't understand Ref #37 because there is not enough information given. I don't know if it is even necessary since Ref #36 seems to cover it.
  • The weblink for Ref #45 appears to be citing a book from 1911. If this is true, then I believ the book source should be cited along with the website that is hosting the information.
  • I redid the citation - citing the book. Since the Google books does not offer a preview of the text, I retained a link to the previously used source as a lay summary link.--Tomobe03 (talk) 09:59, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

I'll put the article on hold until these are taken care of. Thanks! --Tea with toast (話) 02:37, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing the article. I hope all your concerns are addressed appropriately.--Tomobe03 (talk) 09:59, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Final review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Thanks for taking care of those citations!
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    This is a very well researched article; I can't think of anything else you might add. It has been a pleasure to review this article. Thanks for your effort. --Tea with toast (話) 01:34, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Hungarian recognition of Croatia and exterritorial Croatian school system in Hungary

Although Hungary officialy de iure recognized Croatia as independent country on 15 January 1992, together with the rest of EEC, Hungary informally recognized Croatia independence before that, on 6 October 1991 during meeting of diplomats from Poland, Hungary and Czechoslovakia when these 3 countries asked for the international intervention to stop Serbian attacks on Croatia. Also, Hungary organized schools in Croatian language for the refugees settled in Hungary during agression on Croatia. Objavljeno (talk) 23:42, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Assuming there are references to verify that, please feel free to add it to the article. --Joy (talk) 09:22, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Croatia–Hungary relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Categories: