Redirect to:
- From a page move: This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name.
Political affiliation
Hi, 223.247.183.178 in this diff changed the political affiliation of Epoch Times from center-right to right-wing. I'm fine with that if it's true, but I don't think they have an active right-wing agenda and that their political affiliation is more based on the views of their editors rather than an editorial ideology. See a Politico article on them, where it says "If The Epoch Times has a political agenda, though, it seems to be a narrow one". Icebob99 (talk) 14:16, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- The newspaper is consistently anti-communist but not consistently right wing. The stance of anti-communism can span a wide range of politics. Binksternet (talk) 16:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
The Epoch News is now consistently right-wing, or at least what constitutes "right-wing" in the United States in 2018. In the last year I've noticed headlines are regulatory praising Trump or denigrating his political opponents. Until this period I never saw that the paper had any bias or leaning, left or right. I'm not sure if ownership or editorial stance has changed, or what, but it's very noticeable change to me. I'll try to find a legitimate source addressing this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.142.0.106 (talk) 19:37, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Does this page fall within the Falun Gong discretionary sanctions?
If it does, maybe that should be indicated at the top of the talk page here. John Carter (talk) 17:39, 4 December 2017 (UTC) John Carter (talk) 17:39, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. Of course it does, template added. Doug Weller talk 19:10, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Needs controversy section
Needs controversy section — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocdcntx (talk • contribs) 21:14 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 28 December 2018
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: MOVED Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:40, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Epoch Times → The Epoch Times – The title was switched in 2015 without a discussion. The newspaper's web site is theepochtimes.com and their About us page calls themselves The Epoch Times, published by The Epoch Times Association, Inc. Looks like we should switch back, and change the picture and logo from "EPOCH TIMES" to "THE EPOCH TIMES", as it is now styled. — JFG 07:16, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- agreed. they appear to have dropped the article, then put it back. So it seems the main page should be with the article, and the redirect sans.Happy monsoon day 19:46, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support – we go off the masthead for newspaper articles, so if it's The Epoch Times now, it should be moved to that title. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:17, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Not Level 5 Vital (Not even level 0 Vital)
There is no way this is a Level 5 Vital Article. I strongly suspect that someone affiliated with the organization did this to promote the Epoch Times. I removed it from the list of Level 5 vital articles, but I don't know how to remove the template here. Can anybody do that? Flowernerd (talk) 00:29, 31 October 2019 (UTC) Never mind, I figured it out. New to this editing thing. :) Flowernerd (talk) 00:32, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
New Editorials
| WP:NOTFORUM |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Here's the preface to a new editorial by the same people behind the Nine Commentaries, for what it's worth: The Ultimate Goal of Communism. --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 07:41, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Now here's yet another new series: How The Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World. --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 05:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC) Now there's a website, that's dedicated to the treatise How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World even though it's an obvious work in progress. --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 02:10, 30 October 2019 (UTC) |
AFD and Pegida
Reverted "against the mass immigration of Muslims" (POV) back to "anti-immigrant" (per sources). –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:52, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Article about this article
I don't endorse this editorial, but it might be useful to people frequenting this talk page: https://www. breitbart.com/tech/2019/08/27/wikipedia-editors-attack-china-critic-epoch-times-after-nbc-hit-piece/ "Misplaced Pages Editors Attack China Critic ‘Epoch Times’ After NBC Hit Piece" by T. D. Adler--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 04:13, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- First thing is that Breitbart is on the spam blacklist, which is why you had to break the URL in half to post this message. Breitbart is a terrible source and cannot be used for anything but statements about its own views.
- Second thing is that the article's author is banned from Misplaced Pages, indefinitely blocked five years ago as User:The Devil's Advocate. He was a tendentious editor, always making trouble for trouble's sake. He was also a right-wing goose-stepper, which is why Breitbart is publishing him. Binksternet (talk) 06:12, 26 December 2020 (UTC)