Talk:Murder of Richard Everitt

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from Murder of Richard Everitt appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 November 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the perpetrator of the murder of Richard Everitt was never apprehended, because members of the gang who killed him fled to Bangladesh?

A record of the entry may be seen at Misplaced Pages:Recent additions/2015/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Murder of Richard Everitt.

Misplaced Pages

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discrimination Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Richard everitt

I PASS BY RICHARD'S MEMORIAL SITE MOST DAYS WHERE IT IS NOW A TOWER BLOCK I AM TRYING TO CONTACT HIS SISTER LUCY WHO SOME TIMES STAYED WITH HER FRIEND IN LULWORTH TOWER BLOCK IN AGAR GROVE . 85.255.234.40 (talk) 21:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Drummond Street Posse

The "Drummond Street Posse" is mentioned in a couple of sources in relation to Richard's murder, but in contradictory ways.

Mothers Against Murder And Aggression (a charity who are now defunct) previously claimed that the "Drummond Street Posse" was the name of the Asian gang that killed Richard. See https://web.archive.org/web/20100301213309/http://www.mamaa.org/infalre.html. This is weakly supported by http://thecnj.myzen.co.uk/camden/2007/100407/news100407_01.html, which vaguely says that the Posse was "implicated" in Richard's murder,

But Outlook India at https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/backstreet-boys/204223 describes them as a gang who have been defending Drummond Street from aggression by white gangs following Richard's death, and implies (by omission) that they had nothing to do with Richard's killing.

And finally http://www.thecnj.com/camden/2008/041008/news041008_02.html disputes that they are a gang at all: "there is still debate both inside and beyond the police as to whether Camden groups like the Cromer Street Massive, Drummond Street Posse, Centric Boyz and Queens Crescent Crew are any more than loose affiliations of teenagers with no organised criminal element".

All in all I think that the sparse sources are too inconsistent with each other for the gang name to be mentioned in the article in any capacity, but thought I'd mention them in case anyone wants to discuss. If there are reliable sources clearly establishing that the Drummond Street Posse really was a criminal gang and that the attackers were part of it, then that would seem worth including. ExplodingCabbage (talk) 13:58, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

https://web.archive.org/web/20060408155830/https://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006160132,00.html also claims the gangsters were part of the Drummond Street Posse. ExplodingCabbage (talk) 14:22, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

"Racially motivated"

This page has on a few occasions claimed in the lede that the attack was "racially motivated", a claim that was recently restored by @JJNito197. The restoration was part of undoing the remaining non-reverted edits from a spree of vandalism by @Mabz02's, most of which removed well-cited information or baselessly defamed Richard, for instance by accusing him of having a history of racially abusing his killers. The thing is, though, I actually think removing this particular claim was - perhaps by accident - a helpful edit by Mabz.

Whether Richard's killing was "racially motivated" is ambiguous both factually and semantically, and in the article we quote both Frank Dobson saying there was no racial motive and Boris Johnson saying it was not "racist" (which you might or might not consider equivalent to "not racially motivated"). I don't think the article should take a side on this dispute.

The reason for the ambiguity is the interrogatory nature of the attacks, both on Mark Andrew and Richard Everitt's group; both of them were asked about Liam Coyle (who the gang were seeking revenge on) and attacked only after they denied knowing him. One interpretation of this is that the attackers weren't motivated by racial animus at all, but rather were just going after white boys because they thought they'd be likely to know Liam, and attacked because they didn't get any information about him. In that case, it is arguable that the attack isn't properly described as "racially motivated" (though even then, that the gang was interacting with Richard at all did in some sense owe to him being white, and I suppose you could argue that it is therefore correct to call the attack "racially motivated").

Of course, it's certainly not clear the attack wasn't racially motivated, either. One can just as well read the facts and think revenge on Liam was mostly a pretext to go out and hunt white boys for sport.

Given the ambiguity, I think we should refrain from stating either that the attack was or was not racially motivated. We should just spell out the uncontroversial facts that lead many people to characterise it as a racial attack - including mentioning clearly in the lede the victim's and the attackers' races and the fact that they had beef with another white boy - and let the reader make up their own mind. ExplodingCabbage (talk) 12:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Stop removing "white" from the lede

Multiple editors have done this, over the course of months. It's an absurd thing to do. Notwithstanding some reasonable possible disputes about whether to characterise this murder as "racist" or "racially motivated", it is at the very least one in which the race of the victim is relevant. The following points currently uncontested in the article surely make Richard's race of fundamental importance to the whole story:

The attackers selected Richard to target because he was white (not because of any personal connection nor any other demographic reason)
Race-based revenge attacks happened in the aftermath
The history of racial tensions between whites and Bengalis in the area was relevant to the killing
Various elements of the far-right, including the BNP and Tommy Robinson, engaged in activism related to the murder
Multiple notable commentators characterised the killing as racist and/or as a hate crime (which is notable _even if_ you dispute that characterisation)

There is nothing at all crass or racist about characterising him as "white", and knowing that he was white is fundamental to understanding the article. Readers should not have to infer that he was white by e.g. reading about racial revenge attacks; a detail this fundamental should be explicitly stated in the article, and belongs in the intro. ExplodingCabbage (talk) 14:44, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Categories: