This is FMSky's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 10.5 daysย ![]() |
Edits
You gave no reason or indication on why you reverted those edits. It is the same person and I updated a pic from last year. Meep Meep 14:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Which edit are you talking about? --FMSky (talk) 15:17, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Fred Willard in NPRmageddon Podcast
Hi FMSky, I noticed you've contributed edits to the Fred Willard Misplaced Pages entry, and I was wondering if you'd be able to add that he was a cast member of the podcast NPRmageddon in 2023. Hereโs a citation you can use: https://laist.com/news/los-angeles-activities/why-the-creators-of-nprmageddons-dystopian-lost-angeles-see-reporters-as-heroic?utm_source=chatgpt.com Thank you for considering this addition! Lungthief4444 (talk) 21:44, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Danny Elfman
Not sure why you deleted a very serious section about allegations of sexual harassment against a musician by alleging that it is "political." I could see a less careful editor accusing you of being paid to erase it or something similar. I especially dislike your failure to add alternate sources that could have been sufficient. wizzito | say hello! 10:00, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Additionally, the Rolling Stone sources in that article are under their "music" section and not their "politics" section. It wasn't very careful of you to remove that section. wizzito | say hello! 10:02, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Per WP:ROLLINGSTONEPOLITICS "there is unanimous consensus among editors that Rolling Stone is generally unreliable for politically and societally sensitive issues reported since 2011" --FMSky (talk) 15:03, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Do you have a COI with Elfman? This kind of behavior is what gets normies on Twitter to think you are erasing it on behalf of him. wizzito | say hello! 05:25, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- No, I don't even know who this person is. I edit random articles all the time and saw the problematic rolling stone refFMSky (talk) 11:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry for alleging you had a COI. I was just very upset. wizzito | say hello! 00:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- np --FMSky (talk) 01:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry for alleging you had a COI. I was just very upset. wizzito | say hello! 00:58, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- No, I don't even know who this person is. I edit random articles all the time and saw the problematic rolling stone refFMSky (talk) 11:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Do you have a COI with Elfman? This kind of behavior is what gets normies on Twitter to think you are erasing it on behalf of him. wizzito | say hello! 05:25, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Per WP:ROLLINGSTONEPOLITICS "there is unanimous consensus among editors that Rolling Stone is generally unreliable for politically and societally sensitive issues reported since 2011" --FMSky (talk) 15:03, 5 January 2025 (UTC)