Misplaced Pages

User talk:Harshil169/Archives/Archive 2

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Harshil169Redirect page

Redirect to:

This talk page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
  • From a page move: This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name.
When appropriate, protection levels are automatically sensed, described and categorized.

Draft:Amrutha Suresh

Hi, the template says This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. She satisfies WP:SIGCOV and WP:BASIC, has significant coverage from reliable sources that is independent of the subject. Another article written by myself (Abhirami Suresh) successfully passed review and I was even complimented. Actually, Amrutha is more notable than Abhirami and has more coverage than her. 2409:4073:29C:5036:AC64:ACAE:AE94:ACB (talk) 13:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Vivek Agnihotri

Hello, Harshil169. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Vivek Agnihotri at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:22, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


Question about WP:RS

Hello, I hope you are well. I'm concerned about the arguments raised here. I read WP:RS, and bias is clearly not a reason for sources to be blacklisted in Misplaced Pages, even if it is a bias against Misplaced Pages. In fact, there's an entire article devoted to Criticism of Misplaced Pages which has reliable sources. No examples are provided of a lack of editorial oversight or inaccurate reporting, so it seems the discussion is based more on retaliation than reason. Blacklisting sources without sound reasoning compromises NPOV and adds systemic bias. What's the best way to refute these assertions? Moksha88 (talk) 04:58, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Moksha88, suppose some website reveals your identity, you are getting death and legal threats, and the website's article can be used anywhere in the Misplaced Pages article which can further increase problems. Misplaced Pages has solid policy against WP:OUTING and perhaps, that's why sites have been blacklisted so that no one can doxx Misplaced Pages user on Misplaced Pages. I don't know exact reasons but I am sure this may be reason. Criticism of Misplaced Pages is the valid one which doesn't target contributors but mostly focused on content. Hope you can differentiate between two. Brihaspati (talk) 05:22, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 07:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020 at Women in Red

April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162


April offerings at Women in Red.

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kader Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pishin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

GOCE Copyedit

Hello, Harshil169. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Awakening Bharat Mata at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! --Puddleglum(How's my driving?) 15:37, 5 April 2020 (UTC)