Welcome!
Hello, Profloab! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking  or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Misplaced Pages, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.
|
|---|
|
|
Happy editing! --Orgullomoore (talk) 02:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
--Orgullomoore (talk) 02:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, I was unaware about the 500 edits restriction. I only added suggestions to the Talk page. Please let me know if that is inappropriate so I do not do so again in the future. Profloab (talk) 02:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- No, it's fine as long as it can be classified as a constructive edit request, which should generally take the form of "Please change X to Y." --Orgullomoore (talk) 02:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification and I'll try to be more straightforward in my future suggestions too. The page looked very much like standard discussion, so I assumed that was fine. But I know this place has a lot of norms that I'm still learning so again, I do appreciate the advice. Profloab (talk) 03:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- No problem. Just to clarify: there is a little bit of discrimination when it comes to contentious topics, in that people who are "extended-confirmed" ("ec") (i.e., have been a user for 30 days and reached 500 edits) are allowed to edit the page and discuss openly on the Talk page, whereas the participation of non-extended-confirmed users is limited to making constructive edit requests on the Talk page. It is an unfortunate consequence of the fact that these topics tend to attract sockpuppets or other people who are just clearly not here to build an encyclopedia, and this discrimination helps filter those out. You seem very smart. I'm sure you'll do great. Let me know if you need help. --Orgullomoore (talk) 03:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification and I'll try to be more straightforward in my future suggestions too. The page looked very much like standard discussion, so I assumed that was fine. But I know this place has a lot of norms that I'm still learning so again, I do appreciate the advice. Profloab (talk) 03:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- No, it's fine as long as it can be classified as a constructive edit request, which should generally take the form of "Please change X to Y." --Orgullomoore (talk) 02:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)