Misplaced Pages

19 August 2005

• 08:4108:41, 19 August 2005 diff hist +1,163 Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency No edit summary

18 August 2005

• 14:5614:56, 18 August 2005 diff hist +356 Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency No edit summary
• 14:5514:55, 18 August 2005 diff hist −356 Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency No edit summary
• 14:5414:54, 18 August 2005 diff hist 0 Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency No edit summary
• 14:5214:52, 18 August 2005 diff hist +74 Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency No edit summary
• 14:5114:51, 18 August 2005 diff hist +356 Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency No edit summary
• 14:0614:06, 18 August 2005 diff hist +26 m May 30 'm restoring this - the pro-English nature of the tribunal is attested in English government records - it's frankly better documented than her execution itself.
• 14:0014:00, 18 August 2005 diff hist +522 Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency →August 18

23 May 2005

• 02:1702:17, 23 May 2005 diff hist +7 m Gilles de Rais Unfortunately, Misplaced Pages lists Jean V of Brittany as the "VI". Most historians consider him the 5th, but this change would require extensive renaming of articles.
• 02:1102:11, 23 May 2005 diff hist +366 m Gilles de Rais Cleaning up this section and balancing the POV

22 May 2005

• 02:0702:07, 22 May 2005 diff hist +26 m May 30 I'm restoring this - the pro-English nature of the tribunal is attested in English government records - it's frankly better documented than her execution. If one is "POV", then so is the other.

4 May 2005

• 03:1603:16, 4 May 2005 diff hist +11 m Joan of Arc This has nothing to do with glottal-stops. Kindly provide a date for this family tree, just as all the others have a date provided.

3 May 2005

• 03:2303:23, 3 May 2005 diff hist +15 m Joan of Arc Please get a book on medieval French and see that apostrophes were not used, as I said before. There is no need for further argument on such a basic point.

2 May 2005

• 02:5102:51, 2 May 2005 diff hist +15 m Joan of Arc The apostrophe alone proves that it was later than the 15th century. Cite a date for it, in conformance with the other examples given.

1 May 2005

• 02:5602:56, 1 May 2005 diff hist −1 m Jacques d'Arc When a name ends in an "s", the possessive is formed by adding just an apostrophe, rather than an " 's ".
• 02:5502:55, 1 May 2005 diff hist −5 m Joan of Arc No edit summary

29 April 2005

• 02:5102:51, 29 April 2005 diff hist −114 m Jacques d'Arc No edit summary
• 02:4702:47, 29 April 2005 diff hist +709 m Talk:Joan of Arc No edit summary

19 April 2005

• 02:0802:08, 19 April 2005 diff hist +78 m Joan of Arc No edit summary

18 April 2005

• 03:0003:00, 18 April 2005 diff hist +19 m Joan of Arc The intro remains a mess....
• 02:5602:56, 18 April 2005 diff hist +69 m Joan of Arc As you requested, I've cited 15th century manuscript sources. If you really want to add "de Arc", then you'll have to likewise cite a source.

17 April 2005

• 03:1603:16, 17 April 2005 diff hist −221 m Joan of Arc If you're not willing to accept any compromise, let's just mention the modern form and leave it at that.

16 April 2005

• 03:2603:26, 16 April 2005 diff hist +76 m Joan of Arc Here's a version which will hopefully address your views without implying that it was actually written "de Arc" in the 15th century. Otherwise, let's just eliminate this footnote.

15 April 2005

• 02:5902:59, 15 April 2005 diff hist +65 m Joan of Arc All of the forms I listed are found in 15th century manuscripts. As a compromise, I've added another sentence for other forms.

14 April 2005

• 03:2203:22, 14 April 2005 diff hist +376 m Talk:List of occultists →Problems with article
• 03:1903:19, 14 April 2005 diff hist +16 m Joan of Arc This footnote had always presented 15th century spellings; the new addition merely makes it clearer (in response to your own comments) and is not "frivolous". Please just leave it be.

13 April 2005

• 03:2403:24, 13 April 2005 diff hist +12 m Joan of Arc Amended, although the footnote's final sentence had always made it clear that it was referring to 15th century spellings of her name.
• 03:2203:22, 13 April 2005 diff hist +326 m Talk:List of occultists →Problems with article

12 April 2005

• 03:1903:19, 12 April 2005 diff hist +1,029 Talk:List of occultists →Problems with article

11 April 2005

• 02:5502:55, 11 April 2005 diff hist −289 m List of occultists Please don't undo everything which had been worked out a few months ago. Reverting to previous version, and hoping that this can be allowed to rest again.
• 02:5202:52, 11 April 2005 diff hist −8 m Joan of Arc None of the examples you gave were from the 15th century.

10 April 2005

• 02:4402:44, 10 April 2005 diff hist −8 m Joan of Arc There wasn't any source of any kind from the 15th century which used the form "de Arc", and no such source has been cited.

9 April 2005

• 02:5302:53, 9 April 2005 diff hist −8 m Joan of Arc The form "de Arc" was not used in the 15th century manuscripts.

8 April 2005

• 02:5002:50, 8 April 2005 diff hist +433 m Talk:Joan of Arc No edit summary

7 April 2005

• 02:5702:57, 7 April 2005 diff hist +477 m Talk:Joan of Arc No edit summary

6 April 2005

• 02:4602:46, 6 April 2005 diff hist +27 m Joan of Arc →Notes: Minor corrections. Please let this compromise version remain rather than bickering over every single word.
• 02:4202:42, 6 April 2005 diff hist +59 m Talk:Joan of Arc →Names: 15th Century or Modern
• 02:4202:42, 6 April 2005 diff hist +1,174 m Talk:Joan of Arc →Names: 15th Century or Modern

5 April 2005

• 03:0003:00, 5 April 2005 diff hist +153 m Joan of Arc See comments on talk page.
• 02:5802:58, 5 April 2005 diff hist +894 m Talk:Joan of Arc →Names: 15th Century or Modern

4 April 2005

• 02:4402:44, 4 April 2005 diff hist +687 m User talk:Noisy No edit summary
• 02:4102:41, 4 April 2005 diff hist +158 m Joan of Arc There was no standard form given by Joan or anyone else, nor could there have been: spelling in the 15th century was phonetic rather than standardized.

3 April 2005

• 03:5103:51, 3 April 2005 diff hist +57 m Joan of Arc An apostrophe was _not_ used to indicate a glottal stop in 15th century French. The form "D'Arc" is a very recent attempt at compromise, and does not date to the 15th century.

2 April 2005

• 03:5303:53, 2 April 2005 diff hist −212 m Joan of Arc Revert erroneous information - "d'Arc" (with an apostrophe) is not a 15th century spelling found in her birth records, and in fact no apostrophe was ever used in 15th century contracted forms.

1 April 2005

• 03:2803:28, 1 April 2005 diff hist −23 m Joan of Arc No edit summary

31 March 2005

• 04:4604:46, 31 March 2005 diff hist +1,319 m Talk:Joan of Arc Restoring -- Criticisms of ungrammatical edits are not "personal attacks", and you are not allowed to delete other people's posts merely because they criticized - that's considered vandalism.

30 March 2005

• 03:4903:49, 30 March 2005 diff hist −169 m Joan of Arc No edit summary
• 03:4603:46, 30 March 2005 diff hist +381 m Talk:Joan of Arc No edit summary

27 March 2005

• 03:3103:31, 27 March 2005 diff hist +89 m Joan of Arc The phrase: "declared her innocent in 1456 from a postwar appeal" is ungrammatical (improper use of "from"). Rewording and adding extra historical detail.
• 03:2903:29, 27 March 2005 diff hist +22 m Joan of Arc Clarifying and breaking it up into two sentences, each with its own main topic, in order to respond to your objections.