| Revision as of 04:10, 12 November 2004 editTa bu shi da yu (talk | contribs)32,902 edits →Archive4?← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:14, 12 November 2004 edit undoNetoholic (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users39,916 editsm archived to page historyNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| This is an old issue, but I've recently decided that it might be useful to bring the Wikisource conundrum to a conclusion. I have belatedly added termination dates to the polls at ] and ]. I thought it fair to let you know (naturally, this need not bring about any action if you're no longer interested). If you disapprove of the current phrasing of the polls, it will be only proper if you mention this now. -- ] 23:40, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC) | This is an old issue, but I've recently decided that it might be useful to bring the Wikisource conundrum to a conclusion. I have belatedly added termination dates to the polls at ] and ]. I thought it fair to let you know (naturally, this need not bring about any action if you're no longer interested). If you disapprove of the current phrasing of the polls, it will be only proper if you mention this now. -- ] 23:40, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC) | ||
| == Edit summaries == | |||
| I'll certainly do this. However, maybe you can: | |||
| # Stop removing whole sections of articles without discussing this on talk first | |||
| # Practice what you preach - you also misused the edit summary - see Thanks. - ] 02:03, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| *Further to this (I notice you archived this after like 1 hour on your page!) Perhaps you could stop making unilateral moves like blanking the page and redirecting it to a similar yet not quite related page ? Also, more things to look out for: don't just revert with the same edit summary (see ), to which ZenMaster asked you to "rv please discuss your changes on the talk page and give proper time for others to respond" , to which you (ironically) reverted again with exactly the same edit summary . You forced me to revert you because you didn't bother to discuss this to come to some sort of consensus. Then you moved this text to the talk page : however you could have copied it into talk and not removed it. This was reverted , and you ''again'' reverted this with the text "(rvt. do not re-insert un-verified data. source it in the Talk, and then re-add)" . You then reverted ''again'', only this time you were so eager to revert that you altered removed another users edits! I note that you wrote: "(rvt. I am here to protect WP's data integrity)". I find this ironic. Later on you did it ''again''!!! Stop that! - ] 02:34, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == Archive4? == | |||
| I noticed you archived (removed) most of your talk page discussions from the last fews days but I can't seem to find a link on this page to that data? Will it be known of as Archive4? Just wondering. ] 02:44, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :If Netaholic likes, I've taken the liberty of archiving it as a subpage off my talk page. See ]. He can just move it. HTH! - ] 04:10, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:14, 12 November 2004
Talk pages on other Wiki's - simple, meta
Previous items moved to:
|
"They are never alone that are accompanied with noble thoughts."
"To avoid criticism do nothing, say nothing, be nothing.
"This thing that we call 'failure' is not the falling down, but the staying down."
|
"Don't be discouraged by a failure. It can be a positive experience. Failure is, in a sense, the highway to success, inasmuch as every discovery of what is false leads us to seek earnestly after what is true, and every fresh experience points out some form of error which we shall afterwards carefully avoid."
|
Surveys
This is an old issue, but I've recently decided that it might be useful to bring the Wikisource conundrum to a conclusion. I have belatedly added termination dates to the polls at Misplaced Pages talk:Sister projects and Misplaced Pages talk:Wikisource. I thought it fair to let you know (naturally, this need not bring about any action if you're no longer interested). If you disapprove of the current phrasing of the polls, it will be only proper if you mention this now. -- Itai 23:40, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)