| Revision as of 16:31, 19 November 2004 editHemanshu (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers18,813 edits →TFD← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:37, 19 November 2004 edit undoTa bu shi da yu (talk | contribs)32,902 editsm →TFDNext edit → | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| :I would like to put my 2 cents in and say that consensus is required for deletion. If consensus is not reached, the template can be kept. The debate does not last forever. --] 16:31, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC) | :I would like to put my 2 cents in and say that consensus is required for deletion. If consensus is not reached, the template can be kept. The debate does not last forever. --] 16:31, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC) | ||
| Delibertaly tricking me into doing a rollback does not count. When you restored the templates for deletion I counted this as vandalism. Therefore I rolled back. You have only yourself to blame (though I should have noticed your sneakiness). - ] 16:37, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:37, 19 November 2004
Talk pages on other Wiki's - simple, meta
|
"They are never alone that are accompanied with noble thoughts."
"To avoid criticism do nothing, say nothing, be nothing.
"This thing that we call 'failure' is not the falling down, but the staying down."
|
"Don't be discouraged by a failure. It can be a positive experience. Failure is, in a sense, the highway to success, inasmuch as every discovery of what is false leads us to seek earnestly after what is true, and every fresh experience points out some form of error which we shall afterwards carefully avoid."
|
Surveys
This is an old issue, but I've recently decided that it might be useful to bring the Wikisource conundrum to a conclusion. I have belatedly added termination dates to the polls at Misplaced Pages talk:Sister projects and Misplaced Pages talk:Wikisource. I thought it fair to let you know (naturally, this need not bring about any action if you're no longer interested). If you disapprove of the current phrasing of the polls, it will be only proper if you mention this now. -- Itai 23:40, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Hi Netoholic. Your hotmail account seems to be bouncing. Could you let me know which email I can contact you at please. It's not Misplaced Pages-related so I'd rather not put it here. Thanks. Angela. 13:44, Nov 13, 2004 (UTC)
Templates for deletion
Do you have a problem with me removing these from the TfD page? Consensus has been to keep so far. - Ta bu shi da yu 07:44, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Well, they have been there for quite long enough, but I'll respect your request for another admin to work out whether they should be removed or not. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:22, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Oops
Was it the wiki software or me? I was positive I'd removed Nov 11 and not Nov 12 :-/
My apologies for the trouble. Kim Bruning 15:28, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
TFD
No, I won't. They have been on there long enough. I haven't just targetted you, I've gone through all the old TFDs and removed them. Have a nice night, Netoholic. - Ta bu shi da yu 15:34, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Look, my last word for tonight. I removed the templates (probably should have held them in the holding area, but its not that important so long as all the templates are removed). You didn't read deletion policy, so that's hardly me insulting you. As I've said though, have a good night Netoholic. - Ta bu shi da yu 16:22, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- I would like to put my 2 cents in and say that consensus is required for deletion. If consensus is not reached, the template can be kept. The debate does not last forever. --Hemanshu 16:31, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delibertaly tricking me into doing a rollback does not count. When you restored the templates for deletion I counted this as vandalism. Therefore I rolled back. You have only yourself to blame (though I should have noticed your sneakiness). - Ta bu shi da yu 16:37, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)