Misplaced Pages

1900–01 United States Senate elections

← 1898 & 1899 January 16, 1900 – March 28, 1901 1902 & 1903 →
30 of the 90 seats in the United States Senate (as well as special elections) 46 seats needed for a majority
Majority party Minority party   Leader William B. Allison James K. Jones Party Republican Democratic Leader since March 4, 1897 March 4, 1899 Leader's seat Iowa Arkansas Seats before 53 27 Seats after 55 29 Seat change 2 2 Seats up 17 11 Races won 14 13   Third party Fourth party   Party Populist Silver Republican Seats before 4 2 Seats after 2 2 Seat change 2 Seats up 1 1 Races won 0 1   Fifth party   Party Silver Seats before 2 Seats after 2 Seat change Seats up 0 Races won 0
Results of the elections:      Democratic gain      Democratic hold      Republican gain      Republican hold      Silver Republican gain      Silver Republican hold      Legislature failed to elect
Majority Party before election Republican Elected Majority Party Republican

The 1900–01 United States Senate elections were held on various dates in various states, coinciding with President William McKinley's re-election as well as the 1900 House of Representatives elections. As these U.S. Senate elections were prior to the ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913, senators were chosen by state legislatures. Senators were elected over a wide range of time throughout 1900 and 1901, and a seat may have been filled months late or remained vacant due to legislative deadlock. In these elections, terms were up for the senators in Class 2.

Both the Republicans and the Democrats gained two seats at the expense of various third parties and vacancies. Special elections were held to fill vacant seats in Pennsylvania, Utah, and Montana (of which the Republicans won the two former and Democrats the latter) as well as to replace appointees in Minnesota, Nebraska, and Vermont (all of which were carried by the Republicans). Republicans flipped Democratic-held seats in Minnesota, as well as a Populist seat in Nebraska and a Silver Republican held seat in South Dakota. The Silver Republican party kept itself to net neutral gain by flipping a Republican held seat in Idaho. The Democratic party, meanwhile, flipped Republican held seats in Montana and Colorado as well as a Populist held seat in North Carolina.

In Nebraska and Montana's special election, senators were elected shortly after the beginning of the 57th Congress on March 4. In Delaware, the legislature again failed to elect a candidate, leaving both senate seats vacant– the only time a state has gone without representation in the Senate since the first Congress.

Results summary

Senate party division, 57th Congress (1901–1903)

• Majority party: Republican (55)
• Minority party: Democratic (29)
• Other parties: Populist (2); Silver Republican 2; Vacant 2
• Total seats: 90

Change in Senate composition

Before the elections

At the beginning of 1900.

Result of the general elections

Beginning of the next Congress

Race summaries

Elections to the 56th Congress

In these elections, the winner was seated in the current (56th) Congress during 1900 or in 1901 before March 4; ordered by election date.

Elections to the 57th Congress

In these general elections, the winners were elected for the term beginning March 4, 1901; ordered by state.

All of the elections involved the Class 2 seats.

Early election to the 58th Congress

In this election, the winner was seated in the 58th Congress, starting March 4, 1903.

Elections during the 57th Congress

In these elections, the winners was elected in 1901 after March 4 and seated in the 57th Congress.

Pennsylvania (special)

The special election in Pennsylvania was held on January 15, 1901, after the regularly scheduled legislative election in January–April 1899 failed to elect a Senator. Former Senator Matthew Quay, who had left the Senate for nearly two years because of the political stalemate, was again elected by the Pennsylvania General Assembly to the United States Senate.

Republican Matthew Quay was re-elected by the Pennsylvania General Assembly, consisting of the House of Representatives and the Senate, in the 1893 election. With Sen. Quay's term expiring on March 4, 1899, the General Assembly convened on January 18, 1899, to elect a Senator for the next term. Between January 18 and April 19, 1899, seventy-nine ballots were recorded in an attempt to elect a Senator. Instead, the legislature adjourned sine die without electing a Senator due to a dispute between Sen. Quay's political machine and an anti-Quay faction within the Republican Party, along with Democratic Party opposition.

Sen. Quay's term expired on March 4, 1899. Since a Senator had not been elected for the successive term, the seat was vacated. At the time, Quay was under indictment for misuse of funds. He was acquitted, after which Governor William Stone appointed Quay to the vacated Senate seat (a power the Governor did not legally have until the ratification of the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1913). The Senate refused to recognize Quay's appointment, and the seat remained vacant until a Senator could be officially elected (which would ultimately be Quay himself, after a nearly two-year hiatus). This incident, among others, would later be cited by supporters of the 17th Amendment, which mandated the direct election of U.S. Senators.

The Pennsylvania General Assembly convened on January 15, 1901, for a special election to elect a Senator to serve out the remainder of the term that began on March 4, 1899. The results of the vote of both houses combined are as follows:

See also

• 1900 United States elections
  • 1900 United States presidential election
  • 1900 United States House of Representatives elections
• 56th United States Congress
• 57th United States Congress

Notes

1. "17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Direct Election of U.S. Senators (1913)". National Archives and Records Administration. February 8, 2022.
2. ^ Tribune Almanac (1901), p. 300.
3. ^ Tribune Almanac (1901), pp. 299–300.
4. ^ Tribune Almanac (1901), p. 299.
5. ^ Tribune Almanac (1902), p. 300.
6. ^ Tribune Almanac (1902), p. 298.
7. ^ Tribune Almanac (1902), p. 301.
8. ^ Tribune Almanac (1902), p. 297.
9. "Senator morgan re-elected". The New York Times. November 28, 1900. p. 7.
10. ^ "Another Term for Berry of Arkansas". The New York Times. January 23, 1901. p. 5.
11. ^ "Patterson wins in colorado". The New York Times. January 16, 1901. p. 3.
12. "Dubois lands the prize". Lewiston Morning Tribune. Idaho. January 16, 1901. p. 1.
13. "Dubois chosen on first ballot". The Spokesman-Review. Spokane, Washington. January 16, 1901. p. 1.
14. "Cullom of Illinois Succeeds Himself". The New York Times. January 23, 1901. p. 5.
15. ^ Clark, p. 245.
16. A different source tallied the results with an additional vote for both Gear and White.
17. "J.R. Burton the Choice in Kansas". The New York Times. January 23, 1901. p. 5.
18. "Blackburn's Election Duplicated". The New York Times. January 17, 1900. p. 2.
19. ^ "Louisiana Senators Elected". The New York Times. May 23, 1900. p. 2.
20. ^ Tribune Almanac (1902), pp. 297–298.
21. ^ "Frye Wins Out in Maine". The New York Times. January 16, 1901. p. 3.
22. ^ "Democrats Help Re-elect Hoar". The New York Times. January 16, 1901. p. 3.
23. ^ "McMillan of Michigan Re-elected". The New York Times. January 16, 1901. p. 3.
24. Tribune Almanac (1902), p. 299.
25. "W.A. CLARK AGAIN A SENATOR.; Montana Legislature Elects Him on the First Ballot -- He Buys All the Wine in Helena". The New York Times. Retrieved 2021-01-23.
26. ^ Tribune Almanac (1902), pp. 299–300.
27. ^ "Burnham Is New Hampshire's Choice". The New York Times. January 16, 1901. p. 3.
28. ^ "Senator sewell re-elected". The New York Times. January 23, 1901. p. 5.
29. "North Carolina Elects a Democrat". The New York Times. January 23, 1901. p. 5.
30. ^ "Oregon elects a senator". The New York Times. February 25, 1901. p. 1.
31. "Senator wetmore re-elected". The New York Times. June 13, 1900. p. 2.
32. "Tillman South Carolina's Choice". The New York Times. January 24, 1901. p. 5.
33. ^ "R.J. Gamble Succeeds Pettigrew". The New York Times. January 23, 1901. p. 5.
34. "Tennessee Elects Carmack". The New York Times. January 17, 1901. p. 2.
35. ^ "Bailey a Senator from Texas". The New York Times. January 23, 1901. p. 5.
36. "Elkins Re-elected in West Virginia". The New York Times. January 23, 1901. p. 5.
37. "Warren Wins in Wyoming". The New York Times. January 23, 1901. p. 5.
38. ^ "Fusion" here meant Democratic.Tribune Almanac (1902), pp. 299–300
39. ^ "U.S. Senate Election - 1899" (PDF). Wilkes University. Retrieved December 23, 2012.
40. ^ "U.S. Senate Election - 15 January 1901" (PDF). Wilkes University. Retrieved December 23, 2012.

References

• Party Division in the Senate, 1789-Present, via Senate.gov
• Clark, Dan Elbert (1913). "History of Senatorial Elections in Iowa". Iowa City, Iowa.
• Cox, Harold (January 31, 2007). "Pennsylvania Election Statistics: 1682-2006". The Wilkes University Election Statistics Project. Wilkes University.
• The Tribune Almanac and Political Register 1901. New York: The Tribune Association. 1901. pp. 299–301.
• The Tribune Almanac and Political Register 1902. New York: The Tribune Association. 1902. pp. 297–301.

• 1900 United States Senate elections
• 1901 United States Senate elections