Misplaced Pages

1988 Australian Rights and Freedoms referendum

3 September 1988 (1988-09-03)
A Proposed Law: To alter the Constitution to extend the right to trial by jury, to extend freedom of religion, and to ensure fair terms for persons whose property is acquired by any government. Do you approve of this proposed alteration?
Outcome	Not carried, A majority "no" vote nationally and in all six states.
Results
Choice Votes % Yes 2,892,828 30.79% No 6,503,752 69.21% Valid votes 9,396,580 98.52% Invalid or blank votes 141,145 1.48% Total votes 9,537,725 100.00% Registered voters/turnout 10,362,959 92.04%
Results by federal electoral division
Note: Saturation of colour denotes strength of vote

The Constitution Alteration (Rights and Freedoms) Bill 1988, was an unsuccessful proposal to alter the Australian Constitution to enshrine various civil rights, namely freedom of religion, rights in relation to trials, and rights regarding the compulsory acquisition of property. It was put to voters for approval in a referendum held on 3 September 1988.

Background

The constitution provides for 5 express rights, 3 which apply only to the Commonwealth, religious freedom, trial by jury, "just terms" compensation. The 2 rights which apply to all of Australia are free trade between the states, and protection against discrimination based on the state an individual lives in.

The yes case was that the existing protections were inadequate as the state and territory governments were not bound to observe the rights.

The no case was that the proposals threatened existing rights and freedoms and could threaten the future of state aid for independent schools.

Trial by jury

The proposals had been considered by an Advisory Committee to the Constitutional Commission which reported in 1987. There are various limitations to the right in section 80 of the Constitution to trial by jury. The High Court had held in 1915 that the requirement to trial by jury did not apply to the local laws of a territory. While this decision had been criticised by High Court judges in later cases, it had not been overturned. The proposal was to extend the right to every state and territory. The right only applies to trials for indictable offences, which is a procedural matter referring to the form of the charge being "on indictment". While indictable offences are generally more serious than those that are tried summarily, the settled position in the High Court was that the right to jury trials did not apply to all serious offences, but only those determined by the Parliament. The proposal was to set the right to trial by jury to the seriousness of the penalty that may be imposed.

Freedom of religion

The "religious freedom" part of the proposed change was opposed by many churches and religious-affiliated schools concerned that it would be interpreted as requiring a level of church-state separation that would put public funding and government assistance for faith schools in jeopardy.

Conversely, Liberal senator Richard Alston argued that the aforementioned provision could place the use of corporal punishment in religious schools beyond the power of the government to regulate.

Compulsory acquisition of property

Section 51 of the Constitution sets out specific powers of the Commonwealth, including for the acquisition of property. The founders viewed this as the express conferral of a power and not a civil liberties provision. None the less it has come to be seen as one of the few express rights in the Constitution.

Question

A Proposed Law: To alter the Constitution to extend the right to trial by jury, to extend freedom of religion, and to ensure fair terms for persons whose property is acquired by any government.

Do you approve this proposed alteration?

The proposal was to add a new provision to the Constitution as follows :

Section 80 Trial by jury

The trial on indictment of any offence against any law of the Commonwealth shall be by jury, and every such trial shall be held in the State where the offence was committed, and if the offence was not committed within any State the trial shall be held at such place or places as the Parliament prescribes.

(1) The trial of a person for an offence, where the accused is liable to imprisonment for more than two years or any form of corporal punishment, shall be by jury except in the case of a trial for contempt of court or a trial of a member of the Defence Force of the Commonwealth before a court-martial under a law relating to the discipline of the Defence Force of the Commonwealth.

(2) The trial by jury of an offence against a law of the Commonwealth that:

(a) was not committed in a State or Territory;

(b) was committed in two or more of the States and Territories; or

(c) was committed at a place or places unknown;

shall be held at such place or places as the Parliament prescribes.

(3) The trial by jury of any other offence against a law of the Commonwealth shall be held in the State or Territory where the offence was committed.

(4) At any time during a trial referred to in subsection (2) or (3), the court may, on application by the accused or the prosecution, transfer the trial to a court of competent jurisdiction in another State or Territory.

(5) Nothing in subsection (1) prevents the making, or affects the operation, of a law to the extent that the law:

(a) permits waiver by the accused of trial by jury;

(b) regulates the size or composition of the jury; or

(c) provides for majority verdicts.

115A Acquisition of property under State law.

A law of a State may not provide for the acquisition of property from any person except on just terms.

115B Acquisition of property in Territories.

A law made under section one hundred and twenty-two or a law of a Territory may not provide for the acquisition of property from any person except on just terms.

Section 116 Commonwealth not to legislate in respect of religion No establishment etc. of religion

The Commonwealth, a State or a Territory shall not make any law for establishing establish any religion, or for imposing impose any religious observance, or for prohibiting or prohibit the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory.

Results

See also

• 1988 Australian referendum
• Referendums in Australia
• Politics of Australia
• History of Australia

References

1. Constitution Alteration (Rights and Freedoms) Bill 1988 (Cth)
2. ^ Patapan, Haig (1997). "The Dead Hand of the Founders? Original Intent and the Constitutional Protection of Rights and Freedoms in Australia". Federal Law Review. 25 (2): 211–235. doi:10.22145/flr.25.2.1. hdl:10072/16203. S2CID 220297621. (1997) 25(2) Federal Law Review 211.
3. ^ Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs (24 March 1997). "Part 2 - History of Australian Referendums" (PDF). Select sources on constitutional change in Australia 1901-1997. Commonwealth of Australia. ISBN 0644484101.
4. Report of the Advisory Committee to the Constitutional Commission, 1987, ISBN 0642116466, retrieved 24 October 2021 – via Trove
5. R v Bernasconi [1915] HCA 13, (1915) 6 CLR 41.
6. Stellios, James. "The High Court's recent encounters with section 80 jury trials" (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help) (2005) 29 Criminal Law Journal 139.
7. ^ Explanatory Memorandum, Constitution Alteration (Rights and Freedoms) Bill 1988: Explanatory Memorandum (Cth)
8. Stellios 2005, pp. 141–142.
9. Kingswell v R [1985] HCA 72, (1985) 159 CLR 264.
10. "Constitutional Referenda in Australia". www.aph.gov.au.
11. "Notification of particulars of writs for referendums". Commonwealth of Australia Gazette Special. No. S212. 25 July 1988. pp. 3–4. Retrieved 15 November 2019 – via Trove.
12. Handbook of the 44th Parliament (2014) "Part 5 - Referendums and Plebiscites - Referendum results". Parliamentary Library of Australia.
13. "Result of referendum with respect to Rights and Freedoms". Commonwealth of Australia Gazette. No. S324. 27 October 1988. p. 2-3. Retrieved 23 October 2021 – via Trove.
14. ^ Following the 1977 referendum, votes cast in the territories count towards the national total, but are not counted toward any state total.

Further reading

• Bennett, Scott (2003). "Research Paper no. 11 2002–03: The Politics of Constitutional Amendment". Canberra: Parliamentary Library of Australia.
• Australian Electoral Commission (2007) Referendum Dates and Results 1906 – Present AEC, Canberra.

v t e Federal elections and referendums in Australia
Federal elections	1901 1903 1906 1910 1913 1914 1917 1919 1922 1925 1928 1929 1931 1934 1937 1940 1943 1946 1949 1951 1953 1954 1955 1958 1961 1963 1964 1966 1967 1969 1970 1972 1974 1975 1977 1980 1983 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025
Constitutional Convention	1897 1997
Referendums	1906 1910 1911 1913 1916 1917 1919 1926 1928 1937 1944 1946 1948 1951 1967 1973 1974 1977 1984 1988 1999 2017 2023
See also: By-elections

• 1988 referendums
• 1988 in Australian law
• Constitutional referendums in Australia
• Proposed laws of Australia