Misplaced Pages

In mathematics, homotopy theory is a systematic study of situations in which maps can come with homotopies between them. It originated as a topic in algebraic topology, but nowadays is learned as an independent discipline.

Applications to other fields of mathematics

Besides algebraic topology, the theory has also been used in other areas of mathematics such as:

• Algebraic geometry (e.g., A homotopy theory)
• Category theory (specifically the study of higher categories)

Concepts

Spaces and maps

In homotopy theory and algebraic topology, the word "space" denotes a topological space. In order to avoid pathologies, one rarely works with arbitrary spaces; instead, one requires spaces to meet extra constraints, such as being compactly generated weak Hausdorff or a CW complex.

In the same vein as above, a "map" is a continuous function, possibly with some extra constraints.

Often, one works with a pointed space—that is, a space with a "distinguished point", called a basepoint. A pointed map is then a map which preserves basepoints; that is, it sends the basepoint of the domain to that of the codomain. In contrast, a free map is one which needn't preserve basepoints.

The Cartesian product of two pointed spaces ${\displaystyle X,Y}$ are not naturally pointed. A substitute is the smash product ${\displaystyle X\wedge Y}$ which is characterized by the adjoint relation

${\displaystyle \operatorname {Map} (X\wedge Y,Z)=\operatorname {Map} (X,\operatorname {Map} (Y,Z))}$,

that is, a smash product is an analog of a tensor product in abstract algebra (see tensor-hom adjunction). Explicitly, ${\displaystyle X\wedge Y}$ is the quotient of ${\displaystyle X\times Y}$ by the wedge sum ${\displaystyle X\vee Y}$.

Homotopy

Let I denote the unit interval ${\displaystyle }$. A map

${\displaystyle h:X\times I\to Y}$

is called a homotopy from the map ${\displaystyle h_{0}}$ to the map ${\displaystyle h_{1}}$, where ${\displaystyle h_{t}(x)=h(x,t)}$. Intuitively, we may think of ${\displaystyle h}$ as a path from the map ${\displaystyle h_{0}}$ to the map ${\displaystyle h_{1}}$. Indeed, a homotopy can be shown to be an equivalence relation. When X, Y are pointed spaces, the maps ${\displaystyle h_{t}}$ are required to preserve the basepoint and the homotopy ${\displaystyle h}$ is called a based homotopy. A based homotopy is the same as a (based) map ${\displaystyle X\wedge I_{+}\to Y}$ where ${\displaystyle I_{+}}$ is ${\displaystyle I}$ together with a disjoint basepoint.

Given a pointed space X and an integer ${\displaystyle n\geq 0}$, let ${\displaystyle \pi _{n}X=}$ be the homotopy classes of based maps ${\displaystyle S^{n}\to X}$ from a (pointed) n-sphere ${\displaystyle S^{n}}$ to X. As it turns out,

• for ${\displaystyle n\geq 1}$, ${\displaystyle \pi _{n}X}$ are groups called homotopy groups; in particular, ${\displaystyle \pi _{1}X}$ is called the fundamental group of X,
• for ${\displaystyle n\geq 2}$, ${\displaystyle \pi _{n}X}$ are abelian groups by the Eckmann–Hilton argument,
• ${\displaystyle \pi _{0}X}$ can be identified with the set of path-connected components in ${\displaystyle X}$.

Every group is the fundamental group of some space.

A map ${\displaystyle f}$ is called a homotopy equivalence if there is another map ${\displaystyle g}$ such that ${\displaystyle f\circ g}$ and ${\displaystyle g\circ f}$ are both homotopic to the identities. Two spaces are said to be homotopy equivalent if there is a homotopy equivalence between them. A homotopy equivalence class of spaces is then called a homotopy type. There is a weaker notion: a map ${\displaystyle f:X\to Y}$ is said to be a weak homotopy equivalence if ${\displaystyle f_{*}:\pi _{n}(X)\to \pi _{n}(Y)}$ is an isomorphism for each ${\displaystyle n\geq 0}$ and each choice of a base point. A homotopy equivalence is a weak homotopy equivalence but the converse need not be true.

Through the adjunction

${\displaystyle \operatorname {Map} (X\times I,Y)=\operatorname {Map} (X,\operatorname {Map} (I,Y)),\,\,h\mapsto (x\mapsto h(x,\cdot ))}$,

a homotopy ${\displaystyle h:X\times I\to Y}$ is sometimes viewed as a map ${\displaystyle X\to Y^{I}=\operatorname {Map} (I,Y)}$.

CW complex

A CW complex is a space that has a filtration ${\displaystyle X\supset \cdots \supset X^{n}\supset X^{n-1}\supset \cdots \supset X^{0}}$ whose union is ${\displaystyle X}$ and such that

1. ${\displaystyle X^{0}}$ is a discrete space, called the set of 0-cells (vertices) in ${\displaystyle X}$.
2. Each ${\displaystyle X^{n}}$ is obtained by attaching several n-disks, n-cells, to ${\displaystyle X^{n-1}}$ via maps ${\displaystyle S^{n-1}\to X^{n-1}}$; i.e., the boundary of an n-disk is identified with the image of ${\displaystyle S^{n-1}}$ in ${\displaystyle X^{n-1}}$.
3. A subset ${\displaystyle U}$ is open if and only if ${\displaystyle U\cap X^{n}}$ is open for each ${\displaystyle n}$.

For example, a sphere ${\displaystyle S^{n}}$ has two cells: one 0-cell and one ${\displaystyle n}$-cell, since ${\displaystyle S^{n}}$ can be obtained by collapsing the boundary ${\displaystyle S^{n-1}}$ of the n-disk to a point. In general, every manifold has the homotopy type of a CW complex; in fact, Morse theory implies that a compact manifold has the homotopy type of a finite CW complex.

Remarkably, Whitehead's theorem says that for CW complexes, a weak homotopy equivalence and a homotopy equivalence are the same thing.

Another important result is the approximation theorem. First, the homotopy category of spaces is the category where an object is a space but a morphism is the homotopy class of a map. Then

CW approximation —  There exist a functor (called the CW approximation functor)

${\displaystyle \Theta :\operatorname {Ho} ({\textrm {spaces}})\to \operatorname {Ho} ({\textrm {CW}})}$

from the homotopy category of spaces to the homotopy category of CW complexes as well as a natural transformation

${\displaystyle \theta :i\circ \Theta \to \operatorname {Id} ,}$

where ${\displaystyle i:\operatorname {Ho} ({\textrm {CW}})\hookrightarrow \operatorname {Ho} ({\textrm {spaces}})}$, such that each ${\displaystyle \theta _{X}:i(\Theta (X))\to X}$ is a weak homotopy equivalence.

Similar statements also hold for pairs and excisive triads.

Explicitly, the above approximation functor can be defined as the composition of the singular chain functor ${\displaystyle S_{*}}$ followed by the geometric realization functor; see § Simplicial set.

The above theorem justifies a common habit of working only with CW complexes. For example, given a space ${\displaystyle X}$, one can just define the homology of ${\displaystyle X}$ to the homology of the CW approximation of ${\displaystyle X}$ (the cell structure of a CW complex determines the natural homology, the cellular homology and that can be taken to be the homology of the complex.)

Cofibration and fibration

A map ${\displaystyle f:A\to X}$ is called a cofibration if given:

1. A map ${\displaystyle h_{0}:X\to Z}$, and
2. A homotopy ${\displaystyle g_{t}:A\to Z}$

such that ${\displaystyle h_{0}\circ f=g_{0}}$, there exists a homotopy ${\displaystyle h_{t}:X\to Z}$ that extends ${\displaystyle h_{0}}$ and such that ${\displaystyle h_{t}\circ f=g_{t}}$. An example is a neighborhood deformation retract; that is, ${\displaystyle X}$ contains a mapping cylinder neighborhood of a closed subspace ${\displaystyle A}$ and ${\displaystyle f}$ the inclusion (e.g., a tubular neighborhood of a closed submanifold). In fact, a cofibration can be characterized as a neighborhood deformation retract pair. Another basic example is a CW pair ${\displaystyle (X,A)}$; many often work only with CW complexes and the notion of a cofibration there is then often implicit.

A fibration in the sense of Hurewicz is the dual notion of a cofibration: that is, a map ${\displaystyle p:X\to B}$ is a fibration if given (1) a map ${\displaystyle h_{0}:Z\to X}$ and (2) a homotopy ${\displaystyle g_{t}:Z\to B}$ such that ${\displaystyle p\circ h_{0}=g_{0}}$, there exists a homotopy ${\displaystyle h_{t}:Z\to X}$ that extends ${\displaystyle h_{0}}$ and such that ${\displaystyle p\circ h_{t}=g_{t}}$.

While a cofibration is characterized by the existence of a retract, a fibration is characterized by the existence of a section called the path lifting as follows. Let ${\displaystyle p':Np\to B^{I}}$ be the pull-back of a map ${\displaystyle p:E\to B}$ along ${\displaystyle \chi \mapsto \chi (1):B^{I}\to B}$, called the mapping path space of ${\displaystyle p}$. Viewing ${\displaystyle p'}$ as a homotopy ${\displaystyle Np\times I\to B}$ (see § Homotopy), if ${\displaystyle p}$ is a fibration, then ${\displaystyle p'}$ gives a homotopy

${\displaystyle s:Np\to E^{I}}$

such that ${\displaystyle s(e,\chi )(0)=e,\,(p^{I}\circ s)(e,\chi )=\chi }$ where ${\displaystyle p^{I}:E^{I}\to B^{I}}$ is given by ${\displaystyle p}$. This ${\displaystyle s}$ is called the path lifting associated to ${\displaystyle p}$. Conversely, if there is a path lifting ${\displaystyle s}$, then ${\displaystyle p}$ is a fibration as a required homotopy is obtained via ${\displaystyle s}$.

A basic example of a fibration is a covering map as it comes with a unique path lifting. If ${\displaystyle E}$ is a principal G-bundle over a paracompact space, that is, a space with a free and transitive (topological) group action of a (topological) group, then the projection map ${\displaystyle p:E\to X}$ is a fibration, because a Hurewicz fibration can be checked locally on a paracompact space.

While a cofibration is injective with closed image, a fibration need not be surjective.

There are also based versions of a cofibration and a fibration (namely, the maps are required to be based).

Lifting property

A pair of maps ${\displaystyle i:A\to X}$ and ${\displaystyle p:E\to B}$ is said to satisfy the lifting property if for each commutative square diagram

there is a map ${\displaystyle \lambda }$ that makes the above diagram still commute. (The notion originates in the theory of model categories.)

Let ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {c}}}$ be a class of maps. Then a map ${\displaystyle p:E\to B}$ is said to satisfy the right lifting property or the RLP if ${\displaystyle p}$ satisfies the above lifting property for each ${\displaystyle i}$ in ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {c}}}$. Similarly, a map ${\displaystyle i:A\to X}$ is said to satisfy the left lifting property or the LLP if it satisfies the lifting property for each ${\displaystyle p}$ in ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {c}}}$.

For example, a Hurewicz fibration is exactly a map ${\displaystyle p:E\to B}$ that satisfies the RLP for the inclusions ${\displaystyle i_{0}:A\to A\times I}$. A Serre fibration is a map satisfying the RLP for the inclusions ${\displaystyle i:S^{n-1}\to D^{n}}$ where ${\displaystyle S^{-1}}$ is the empty set. A Hurewicz fibration is a Serre fibration and the converse holds for CW complexes.

On the other hand, a cofibration is exactly a map satisfying the LLP for evaluation maps ${\displaystyle p:B^{I}\to B}$ at ${\displaystyle 0}$.

Loop and suspension

On the category of pointed spaces, there are two important functors: the loop functor ${\displaystyle \Omega }$ and the (reduced) suspension functor ${\displaystyle \Sigma }$, which are in the adjoint relation. Precisely, they are defined as

• ${\displaystyle \Omega X=\operatorname {Map} (S^{1},X)}$, and
• ${\displaystyle \Sigma X=X\wedge S^{1}}$.

Because of the adjoint relation between a smash product and a mapping space, we have:

${\displaystyle \operatorname {Map} (\Sigma X,Y)=\operatorname {Map} (X,\Omega Y).}$

These functors are used to construct fiber sequences and cofiber sequences. Namely, if ${\displaystyle f:X\to Y}$ is a map, the fiber sequence generated by ${\displaystyle f}$ is the exact sequence

${\displaystyle \cdots \to \Omega ^{2}Ff\to \Omega ^{2}X\to \Omega ^{2}Y\to \Omega Ff\to \Omega X\to \Omega Y\to Ff\to X\to Y}$

where ${\displaystyle Ff}$ is the homotopy fiber of ${\displaystyle f}$; i.e., a fiber obtained after replacing ${\displaystyle f}$ by a (based) fibration. The cofibration sequence generated by ${\displaystyle f}$ is ${\displaystyle X\to Y\to Cf\to \Sigma X\to \cdots ,}$ where ${\displaystyle Cf}$ is the homotooy cofiber of ${\displaystyle f}$ constructed like a homotopy fiber (use a quotient instead of a fiber.)

The functors ${\displaystyle \Omega ,\Sigma }$ restrict to the category of CW complexes in the following weak sense: a theorem of Milnor says that if ${\displaystyle X}$ has the homotopy type of a CW complex, then so does its loop space ${\displaystyle \Omega X}$.

Classifying spaces and homotopy operations

Given a topological group G, the classifying space for principal G-bundles ("the" up to equivalence) is a space ${\displaystyle BG}$ such that, for each space X,

${\displaystyle =}$ {principal G-bundle on X} / ~ ${\displaystyle ,\,\,\mapsto }$

where

• the left-hand side is the set of homotopy classes of maps ${\displaystyle X\to BG}$,
• ~ refers isomorphism of bundles, and
• = is given by pulling-back the distinguished bundle ${\displaystyle EG}$ on ${\displaystyle BG}$ (called universal bundle) along a map ${\displaystyle X\to BG}$.

Brown's representability theorem guarantees the existence of classifying spaces.

Spectrum and generalized cohomology

The idea that a classifying space classifies principal bundles can be pushed further. For example, one might try to classify cohomology classes: given an abelian group A (such as ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }$),

${\displaystyle =\operatorname {H} ^{n}(X;A)}$

where ${\displaystyle K(A,n)}$ is the Eilenberg–MacLane space. The above equation leads to the notion of a generalized cohomology theory; i.e., a contravariant functor from the category of spaces to the category of abelian groups that satisfies the axioms generalizing ordinary cohomology theory. As it turns out, such a functor may not be representable by a space but it can always be represented by a sequence of (pointed) spaces with structure maps called a spectrum. In other words, to give a generalized cohomology theory is to give a spectrum. A K-theory is an example of a generalized cohomology theory.

A basic example of a spectrum is a sphere spectrum: ${\displaystyle S^{0}\to S^{1}\to S^{2}\to \cdots }$

Ring spectrum and module spectrum

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (September 2024)

Key theorems

• Seifert–van Kampen theorem
• Homotopy excision theorem
• Freudenthal suspension theorem (a corollary of the excision theorem)
• Landweber exact functor theorem
• Dold–Kan correspondence
• Eckmann–Hilton argument - this shows for instance higher homotopy groups are abelian.
• Universal coefficient theorem
• Dold–Thom theorem

Obstruction theory and characteristic class

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (May 2020)

See also: Characteristic class, Postnikov tower, Whitehead torsion

Localization and completion of a space

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (May 2020)

Specific theories

There are several specific theories

• simple homotopy theory
• stable homotopy theory
• chromatic homotopy theory
• rational homotopy theory
• p-adic homotopy theory
• equivariant homotopy theory

Homotopy hypothesis

One of the basic questions in the foundations of homotopy theory is the nature of a space. The homotopy hypothesis asks whether a space is something fundamentally algebraic.

If one prefers to work with a space instead of a pointed space, there is the notion of a fundamental groupoid (and higher variants): by definition, the fundamental groupoid of a space X is the category where the objects are the points of X and the morphisms are paths.

Abstract homotopy theory

Abstract homotopy theory is an axiomatic approach to homotopy theory. Such axiomatization is useful for non-traditional applications of homotopy theory. One approach to axiomatization is by Quillen's model categories. A model category is a category with a choice of three classes of maps called weak equivalences, cofibrations and fibrations, subject to the axioms that are reminiscent of facts in algebraic topology. For example, the category of (reasonable) topological spaces has a structure of a model category where a weak equivalence is a weak homotopy equivalence, a cofibration a certain retract and a fibration a Serre fibration. Another example is the category of non-negatively graded chain complexes over a fixed base ring.

Simplicial set

A simplicial set is an abstract generalization of a simplicial complex and can play a role of a "space" in some sense. Despite the name, it is not a set but is a sequence of sets together with the certain maps (face and degeneracy) between those sets.

For example, given a space ${\displaystyle X}$, for each integer ${\displaystyle n\geq 0}$, let ${\displaystyle S_{n}X}$ be the set of all maps from the n-simplex to ${\displaystyle X}$. Then the sequence ${\displaystyle S_{n}X}$ of sets is a simplicial set. Each simplicial set ${\displaystyle K=\{K_{n}\}_{n\geq 0}}$ has a naturally associated chain complex and the homology of that chain complex is the homology of ${\displaystyle K}$. The singular homology of ${\displaystyle X}$ is precisely the homology of the simplicial set ${\displaystyle S_{*}X}$. Also, the geometric realization ${\displaystyle |\cdot |}$ of a simplicial set is a CW complex and the composition ${\displaystyle X\mapsto |S_{*}X|}$ is precisely the CW approximation functor.

Another important example is a category or more precisely the nerve of a category, which is a simplicial set. In fact, a simplicial set is the nerve of some category if and only if it satisfies the Segal conditions (a theorem of Grothendieck). Each category is completely determined by its nerve. In this way, a category can be viewed as a special kind of a simplicial set, and this observation is used to generalize a category. Namely, an ${\displaystyle \infty }$-category or an ${\displaystyle \infty }$-groupoid is defined as particular kinds of simplicial sets.

Since simplicial sets are sort of abstract spaces (if not topological spaces), it is possible to develop the homotopy theory on them, which is called the simplicial homotopy theory.

See also

• Highly structured ring spectrum
• Homotopy type theory
• Pursuing Stacks
• Shape theory
• Moduli stack of formal group laws
• Crossed module

References

1. May, Ch. 8. § 3.
2. May, Ch 4. § 5.
3. Milnor 1959, Corollary 1. NB: "second countable" implies "separable".
4. May, Ch. 10., § 5
5. May, Ch. 10., § 6
6. May, Ch. 10., § 7
7. Hatcher, Example 0.15.
8. May, Ch 6. § 4.
9. Some authors use ${\displaystyle \chi \mapsto \chi (0)}$. The definition here is from May, Ch. 8., § 5.
10. May, Ch. 7., § 2.
11. ${\displaystyle p}$ in the reference should be ${\displaystyle p^{I}}$.
12. May, Ch. 7., § 4.
13. May, Ch. 6., Problem (1)
14. May, Ch 8. § 3. and § 5.
15. May & Ponto, Definition 14.1.5.
16. "A Serre fibration between CW-complexes is a Hurewicz fibration in nLab".
17. May, Ch. 8, § 2.
18. May, Ch. 8, § 6.
19. Milnor 1959, Theorem 3.
20. Dwyer & Spalinski, Example 3.5.
21. Dwyer & Spalinski, Example 3.7.
22. ^ May, Ch. 16, § 4.

• Bott, Raoul; Tu, Loring W. (1995). Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology. Springer. ISBN 978-038790613-3.
• May, J. Peter. "A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology" (PDF). University of Chicago.

• May, J. Peter; Ponto, Kate. More Concise Algebraic Topology: Localization, completion, and model categories (PDF). University of Chicago Press. p. 215. ISBN 978-022651178-8 – via University of Edinburgh.

• Whitehead, George William (1978). Elements of homotopy theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 61 (3rd ed.). New York-Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. xxi+744. ISBN 978-0-387-90336-1. MR 0516508. Retrieved September 6, 2011.
• Brown, Ronald (2006). "Topology and groupoids". Booksurge LLC. ISBN 1-4196-2722-8.
• "Homotopical algebra". nLab.

• Dwyer, W.G.; Spalinski, J. "Homotopy Theories and Model Categories". In James, I.M. (ed.). Handbook of Algebraic Topology. ISBN 0-444-81779-4.

• Hatcher, Allen. "Algebraic topology".
• Milnor, John (1959). "On spaces having the homotopy type of 𝐶𝑊-complex". Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 90 (2): 272–280. doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1959-0100267-4. ISSN 0002-9947. S2CID 123048606.
• Spanier, Edwin. Algebraic topology. ISBN 978-0-387-94426-5.
• Sullivan, Dennis (July 1974). "Genetics of homotopy theory and the Adams conjecture" (PDF). Annals of Mathematics. 2. 100 (1): 1–79 – via Math - Côte d'Azur University.

Further reading

• Cisinski, Denis-Charles (March 2015). "Higher Categories And Topos Theory(in french)" (PDF). Math - University of Toulouse.
• Porter, Timothy (February 12, 2010). "Abstract Homotopy Theory: The Interaction Of Category Theory And Homotopy Theory: A Revised Version Of The 2001 Article" (PDF). nLab.
• "Math 527 - Homotopy Theory Spring 2013, Section F1". University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign – via University of Regina., lectures by Martin Frankland
• Quillen, D. (1967). Homotopical algebra. Lectures Notes in Math. Vol. 43. Springer Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-03914-3.

External links

• "Homotopy theory". ncatlab.org.

• Homotopy theory