Misplaced Pages

The following is a list of common non-native pronunciations that English speakers make when trying to speak foreign languages. Many of these are due to transfer of phonological rules from English to the new language as well as differences in grammar and syntax that they encounter.

This article uses International Phonetic Alphabet pronunciation. See Help:IPA pronunciation key and IPA chart for English for an introduction.

Esperanto

• English speakers tend to assimilate /m/ to before /f/ or /v/, as well /n/ to before /k/ or /ɡ/, neither of which occurs in "strictly regular" Esperanto. However, since Zamenhof himself recognized this type of assimilation, there is debate over whether this is actually an error.
• Speakers tend to pronounce Esperanto /e/ as , the vowel of pay.
• Speakers tend to reduce unstressed vowels.
• Speakers tend to pronounce /x/ as or otherwise have a hard time pronouncing it. This sort of difficulty is behind the gradual shift from ⟨ĥ⟩ to ⟨k⟩ (see Esperanto phonology#Loss of phonemic ĥ).
• Speakers tend to pronounce the rhotic consonant as , rather than an alveolar trill. Speakers of non-rhotic accents tend to mute the r when at end of a word or before a consonant.
• Other pronunciation difficulties are related to spelling pronunciations of digraphs. The digraph ⟨sc⟩ represents /st͡s/, though speakers may substitute or . The digraph ⟨kn⟩ represents /kn/, though speakers may mute the /k/. The ⟨g⟩ in the digraph ⟨ng⟩ is always pronounced.

German

• One of the most difficult is German /eː/ as it is further forward in the mouth than in varieties of Standard English so that speakers may pronounce German geht as if it were English gate.
• Similarly, speakers may pronounce German /oː/ with the vowel of goat so that ohne is pronounced .
• Speakers tend to have difficulty with the front rounded vowels, /øː/, /œ/, /yː/, and /ʏ/ (written ⟨ö⟩ and ⟨ü⟩).
• Speakers have some difficulty with German /a/, which may be pronounced as or . Equally, /aː/ may be pronounced as , though this is less problematic since the same realisation is also used by some native speakers.
• Speakers have difficulty with the two sounds represented by ⟨ch⟩ ( and ) in German, particularly the latter. Often both are replaced with ; replacement of with is also common.
• Speakers may have trouble pronouncing German ⟨l⟩ as a clear l in positions where it is a dark l in English (that is, in the syllable coda).

Mandarin Chinese

• English speakers have difficulty with the 4 lexical tones of Mandarin Chinese.

Russian

• Some speakers have difficulty with the trilled in Russian, especially the palatalized since neither are sounds of English.
  • Non-rhotic speakers, even after learning the rolled-r, are prone to omit /r/ in such Russian words as удар ('blow') and горка ('hillock').
• Depending on the speaker's dialect, they may have difficulty with "dark l" (that is, velarized , which in Russian contrasts with a palatalized ) in positions other than in the syllable coda.
• Difficulty with Russian vowels:
  • Most English speakers have no (although it is an allophone in some dialects, see weak vowel merger) and speakers generally have difficulty producing the sound. They may instead produce .
  • Speakers may replace /e/ with the diphthong in day. e.g. instead of дело ('affair').
  • Speakers are likely to diphthongize /u/, making сижу ('I sit') sound more like . Some speakers may also universally front it to .
  • Speakers may also diphthongize /i/ in a similar fashion, especially in open syllables.
  • Speakers may have difficulty with Russian /o/, pronouncing it as either or .
  • It is likely that speakers will make the second element of Russian diphthongs insufficiently close, making them resemble English diphthongs (e.g., instead of ) or pronounce it too long.
  • Speakers may pronounce /a/ as in closed syllables так ('so') and in open syllables два ('two').
• Speakers may also have difficulty with the Russian vowel reduction system as well as other allophonic vowels.
  • Tendency to reverse the distribution of and . English speakers tend to pronounce in the pretonic position, right where is required in Russian, while they pronounce in pre-pretonic positions, where occurs. Thus, speakers may say голова ('head') as instead of and сторона ('side') as instead of .
• There are no cues to indicate correct stress in Russian. Speakers must memorize where primary and secondary stress resides in each word and are likely to make mistakes.
• Speakers tend to fail to geminate double consonants.

Serbo-Croatian

• Speakers may have a difficulty with Serbo-Croatian pitch accent and vowel length. This rarely leads to loss of intelligibility as long as the word stress is correct.
  • Speakers may transfer vowel length from English, producing longer vowels before voiced consonants (such as /b/ or /z/) and shorter vowels before the voiceless ones (such as /p/ or /s/) - see pre-fortis clipping. In Serbo-Croatian, vowels can be long or short in any environment; in fact, there are minimal pairs based only on length: compare grad /ɡrâd/ ('city') with grad /ɡrâːd/ ('hail').
  • If speakers learn to produce correct vowel length, they may diphthongize long /iː, uː, eː, oː/ to instead of the correct .
• Speakers may incorrectly reduce unstressed vowels to [ə], yielding pronunciations such as instead of for lepota ('beauty'). In Serbo-Croatian, vowels do not change their quality in unstressed positions.
• Voiced consonants (/b, d, ɡ, dʒ, dʑ, z, ʒ/) can be only partially rather than fully voiced .
  • Similarly, /ʋ/ (which phonologically is an approximant and therefore not the voiced counterpart of /f/) can also be realized as a partially voiced fricative instead of a fully voiced weak fricative [ʋ̝].
• Speakers may incorrectly realize the voiceless stops /p, t, k/ as aspirated .
• Speakers may realize /n, t, d/ as alveolar rather than dental .
  • Speakers may incorrectly transfer allophones of English /t/ to Serbo-Croatian, yielding pronunciations such as instead of for čuti ('to hear') or instead of for njutn ('newton'), all of which sound strange to native ears and might not even be understood as belonging to the /t/ phoneme, potentially leading to a serious loss of intelligibility.
• Speakers may have a difficulty distinguishing /tʃ, dʒ/ from /tɕ, dʑ/. This does not lead to loss of intelligibility as many natives merge them as well.
  • Speakers who try to distinguish /tʃ, dʒ/ from /tɕ, dʑ/ may realize the former with inappropriate palatalization, i.e. as palato-alveolar instead of flat postalveolar (laminal retroflex) .
  • The same applies to /ʃ, ʒ/, which can be realized as instead of .
• Speakers may realize /x/ as glottal [h], rather than a weak velar fricative [x̞].
• The palatal sounds /ɲ, ʎ/ may be realized as sequences .
• Instead of a trill [r], /r/ can be realized as a postalveolar approximant [ɹ̠].
• /j/ preceded within the same word by a vowel (as in gaj /ɡâːj/ ('grove')) can be articulated with an insufficiently raised tongue ( instead of or [j]).

Spanish

• Substitution of for .
• "R-coloration" of vowels, especially at the end of infinitives.

See also

• Accent reduction
• Non-native pronunciations of English

References

1. Blanke (2001), pp. 41, 330–331.
2. Blanke (2001), p. 37.
3. Blanke (2001), p. 38.
4. Blanke (2001), p. 39.
5. Blanke (2001), p. 40.
6. Blanke (2001), p. 41.
7. Hall (2003), p. 81.
8. Hall (2003), p. 91.
9. Hall (2003), pp. 92–97.
10. Hall (2003), pp. 85–87.
11. Hall (2003), p. 46.
12. "German Consonants 'ch' - Paul Joyce".
13. "The German Consonant 'l' - Paul Joyce".
14. Gottfried & Suiter (1997).
15. Jones & Ward (1969), p. 185.
16. Jones & Ward (1969), p. 168.
17. Jones & Ward (1969), p. 33.
18. Jones & Ward (1969), p. 41.
19. Jones & Ward (1969), p. 64.
20. Jones & Ward (1969), p. 30.
21. Jones & Ward (1969), p. 56.
22. Jones & Ward (1969), p. 75.
23. Jones & Ward (1969), p. 47.
24. Jones & Ward (1969), p. 55.
25. Jones & Ward (1969), p. 212.
26. Jones & Ward (1969), p. 214.
27. Kordić (1997), p. 8.
28. Alexander (2006), p. 4.
29. ^ Hodge & Janković (1965), p. 10.
30. ^ Alexander (2006), p. 3.
31. Hodge & Janković (1965), pp. 12, 20.
32. Kordić (1997), p. 4.
33. Hodge & Janković (1965), pp. 30−31.
34. Hodge & Janković (1965), p. 30.
35. Morén (2005), pp. 5–6.
36. Hodge & Janković (1965), pp. 30−31, 33.
37. Hodge & Janković (1965), pp. 31, 34.
38. Hodge & Janković (1965), p. 31.
39. Kordić (1997), p. 5.
40. Alexander (2006), pp. 3−4.
41. ^ Hodge & Janković (1965), p. 32.
42. Hodge & Janković (1965), p. 33.
43. Hodge & Janković (1965), p. 34.
44. Hodge & Janković (1965), pp. 32–33.
45. Hodge & Janković (1965), p. 29.
46. "Most Common Pitfalls of English Speakers Learning Spanish". My Daily Spanish. 2016-09-14. Retrieved 2020-06-02.
47. "Pronunciación de la lengua española para anglohablantes | Middle Tennessee State University". www.mtsu.edu. Retrieved 2020-06-02.

Bibliography

• Alexander, Ronelle (2006), Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian – A Grammar with Sociolinguistic Commentary, The University of Wisconsin Press, ISBN 978-0-299-21194-3
• Blanke, Detlev (2001), Studoj pri interlingvistiko, Studien zur Interlinguistik (in Esperanto and German), KAVA-PECH, ISBN 80-85853-53-1
• Hodge, Carlton H.; Janković, Janko (1965), Serbo-Croatian Basic Course, vol. 1, Foreign Service Institute
• Gottfried, T.L.; Suiter, T.L. (1997), "Effect of linguistic experience on the identification of Mandarin tones", Journal of Phonetics, 25: 207–231, doi:10.1006/jpho.1997.0042
• Hall, Christopher (2003), Modern German pronunciation: An introduction for speakers of English (2nd ed.), New York: Manchester University Press
• Jones, Daniel; Ward, Dennis (1969), The Phonetics of Russian, Cambridge University Press
• Kordić, Snježana (1997), Serbo-Croatian, Languages of the World/Materials; 148, Munich & Newcastle: Lincom Europa, ISBN 3-89586-161-8
• Morén, Bruce (2005), Consonant-Vowel Interactions in Serbian: Features, Representations and Constraint Interactions (PDF), Center for Advanced Study of Theoretical Linguistics, Tromsø, archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-09-29, retrieved 2018-02-24
• Zamenhof, L.L. (1963), Fundamento de Esperanto, Esperantaj Francaj Eldonoj

• Phonology
• Language acquisition
• Language comparison
• Linguistic error