Misplaced Pages

Animal Defence and Anti-Vivisection Society

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Animal Defence Trust) English animal rights organization

Animal Defence and Anti-Vivisection Society
A demonstration on 19 March 1910 in Trafalgar Square, London, in support of the Brown Dog. The society's banner can be seen on Nelson's Column in the background.
Formation1906; 118 years ago (1906)
Founders
  • Lizzy Lind af Hageby
  • Nina Douglas-Hamilton, Duchess of Hamilton
Dissolved1971; 53 years ago (1971)
FocusAnimal protection, animal welfare

The Animal Defence and Anti-Vivisection Society (ADAVS), also known as the Animal Defence Society was an animal welfare organisation, co-founded in England, in 1906, by Lizzy Lind af Hageby, and Nina Douglas-Hamilton, Duchess of Hamilton. The objective of the Society was a "Consistent Opposition to all forms of Cruelty to Animals and Abolition of Vivisection". The Society was known for its support of humane slaughter.

The Society's assets were transferred to a charity, The Animal Defence Trust that was registered in 1971.

History

It was based for many years at Animal Defence House, 15 St James's Place, London, and ran a 237-acre animal sanctuary at Ferne House near Shaftesbury, Dorset, an estate owned by the Duke and Duchess of Hamilton.

An early member of the Society's executive council was Alice Drakoules who was a lifelong campaigner for animal welfare and a keen supporter of the Society. She helped the Society campaign for humane slaughter, licensed slaughterhouses and for an end to performing animals.

The Society came to widespread attention during the Brown Dog affair (1903–1910), which began when Lind af Hageby infiltrated the vivisection in University College London of a brown terrier dog. The subsequent description of the experiment in her book, The Shambles of Science (1903) – in which she wrote that the dog had been conscious throughout and in pain – led to a protracted scandal and a libel case, which the accused researcher won. The affair continued for several years, making a name both for Lind af Hageby and for the Society.

The Society was associated with Hageby's International Humanitarian Bureau. It published The Anti-Vivisection and Humanitarian Review in 1929 and Progress Today: The Humanitarian and Anti-Vivisection Review in the 1930s. In 1933, members of the Society's executive council included Sara Blomfield, Charlotte Despard, Douglas S. S. Steuart and Janette Ranken Thesiger.

In 1959, the Society protested against a mass pigeon shoot throughout the East of England the Midlands.

NC State University Libraries holds a large collection of pamphlets from the Animal Defence and Anti-Vivisection Society.

Slaughter reform

Despite supporting total abolition of vivisection the Society advocated reform of animal slaughter. The Society called for legislation making humane slaughter compulsory. The Society advertised its own "humane killer" for sale, a type of captive bolt pistol. In 1923, the Society advocated a statement of minimum slaughter reform that was sent to the Cabinet Committee. Their proposal was that local authorities should be under obligation to approve only types of human killers for use in the slaughterhouse within their districts and that inspectors should be allowed to enter the slaughterhouse to enforce the Act. They urged that all slaughtermen should be licensed and that any other method of killing animals for food should be prohibited.

The Society opposed the use of the knife and poleaxe in slaughter. Lizzy Lind af Hageby and Duchess Nina Douglas-Hamilton both visited slaughterhouses and tested the "humane killer" and criticized the cruelty of the poleaxe. In 1924, a report they signed had found that a pig had to be hit four times on the head before it was rendered unconscious and that the humane killer rendered twenty animals unconscious by the first shot. In 1925, it was reported that the Duchess of Hamilton had witnessed 52 animals being slaughtered in a single afternoon in pursuance of the statutory use of the humane killer. The Society supported the Slaughter of Animals Act 1933. The humane killer gained support from slaughterhouse workers. John Dodds, superintendent of the Carlisle abattoir became an expert adviser to the Society in their campaign for compulsory use of the humane killer. The Society's Slaughter Reform Department consisted of John Dodds and Constance Warner.

In 1937, the Society organized an exhibition in London with demonstrations of humane killers. In 1939, the Society angered the poultry industry by campaigning against the use of battery cage hens. The Society stated that the hens are imprisoned in the battery system in a confined space with no contact with fresh air and grass.

Model Humane Abattoir

The Society campaigned for the abolition of private slaughterhouses and the creation of humanely-conducted public abattoirs. In 1929, the Society opened the "Model Humane Abattoir" in Letchworth. The building was owned by the Society and was used to demonstrate humane slaughter and hygienic treatment of meat. It was designed by R. Stephen Ayling between 1925 and 1926. The humane model abattoir was built on a site covering two acres and planned to deal with 20,000 animals a year. The site contained a slaughter hall, lairs, cooling hall for cattle, general loading stage, chill rooms, engine room, a large lecture theatre and a veterinary inspection area. The Society also planned to build a bacon factory in which pigs were shot with the humane killer. The model humane abattoir gained support from the National Council for Animals' Welfare.

The Society stated that the meat from the abattoir was to sold by their own company. Duchess Nina Douglas-Hamilton was a vegetarian in her personal life but in 1928 became the head of a humane butcher's shop.

The Animal Defence Trust

Following Lind af Hageby's death in December 1963, the Society's assets were transferred to a trust, The Animal Defence Trust, which continues to offer grants for animal-protection projects. The Animal Defence Trust registered as a charity in 1971. It describes itself as a "charity whose main aims are the welfare of animals and protection of them from cruelty and suffering, the promotion of research to discover ways of reducing the use of animals in scientific research, and the establishment of inspections of animal transportation to ensure proper and humane accommodation".

Selected publications

See also

References

  1. Bazlinton, Chris (1977). The Guardian Directory of Pressure Groups & Representative Associations. Gale Research Company. p. 249. ISBN 978-0904655001.
  2. ^ Kean, Hilda (1995). "The 'Smooth Cool Men of Science': The Feminist and Socialist Response to Vivisection". History Workshop Journal. 40 (1): 16–38. JSTOR 4289385.
  3. ^ Animal Defence and Anti-Vivisection Society Report for the Year 1933 (PDF). 1935.
  4. "Humane Killing". Pall Mall Gazette. 7 December 1921. p. 12. (subscription required)
  5. ^ "Our Case for Slaughter Reform". The Daily Herald. 12 January 1924. p. 2. (subscription required)
  6. ^ "About". The Animal Defence Trust. 2023. Archived from the original on 4 December 2023.
  7. Smith, Andy. "Press dynasty is coming home from exile to a '£6m' mansion", The Observer, 13 June 1999.
  8. Kean, Hilda. (2004-09-23). "Drakoules , Alice Marie (c. 1850–1933), humanitarian and campaigner for animal welfare". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Retrieved 30 Dec. 2017, see link
  9. ^ "The International Humanitarian Bureau". lonsea.de. Retrieved 14 January 2022.
  10. "Pigeon shoot success". Lincoln Rutland & Stamford Mercury. 6 March 1959. p. 1. (subscription required)
  11. Animal Defence and Anti-Vivisection Society. d.lib.ncsu.edu. Retrieved 8 December 2023.
  12. "Animal Defence Society". The Courier. 20 April 1923. p. 5. (subscription required)
  13. "Humane Slaughter". The Nuneaton Chronicle. 10 July 1925. p. 2. (subscription required)
  14. "An Urgent Appeal to Women". The Vote. 20 January 1922. p. 19. (subscription required)
  15. ^ "Humane Slaughtering: Animal Defence Society's Minimum Points of Reform". The Daily Herald. 9 April 1923. p. 5. (subscription required)
  16. "The Slaughter of Cattle". The Western Morning News and Mercury. 16 January 1924. p. 6. (subscription required)
  17. "Humane Slaughter". The Southwark and Bermondsey Recorder and South London Gazette. 7 August 1925. p. 7. (subscription required)
  18. "Forty Years in Slaughterhouse". The Observer. 13 August 1925. p. 2. (subscription required)
  19. "Animal Defence Society Critics of Ox-Roasting". The Shields News. 15 March 1937. p. 5. (subscription required)
  20. "Give Hens A Social Life Says Society". The Daily Mirror. 15 May 1939. p. 17. (subscription required)
  21. ^ "A Model Abattoir". The Evening News. 6 January 1926. (subscription required)
  22. ^ "Women and Slaughterhouses". The Edinburgh Evening News. 23 April 1925. p. 3. (subscription required)
  23. Crawford, Elizabeth (2003). The Women's Suffrage Movement: A Reference Guide 1866-1928. Taylor & Francis. p. 703. ISBN 978-1135434014.
  24. "Duchess as Butcher". The Falkirk Herald. 8 August 1928. (subscription required)
  25. "A Ducal Butcher's Shop". The Observer. 11 August 1928. p. 14. (subscription required)
  26. ^ "History". The Animal Defence Trust. Retrieved 28 February 2020.

Further reading

  • Gålmark, Elisabeth Lisa. Shambles of Science, Lizzy Lind af Hageby & Leisa Schartau, anti-vivisektionister 1903-1913/14. Stockholm University, 1996.
  • Gålmark, Elisabeth Lisa. "Women Antivivisectionists, The Story of Lizzy Lind af Hageby and Leisa Schartau," in Animal Issues. 2000, Vol 4, No 2, pp. 1–32.
  • Kean, Hilda. Animal Rights: Political and Social Change in Britain since 1800. Reaktion Books, 1998.
  • Lansbury, Coral. The Old Brown Dog: Women, Workers, and Vivisection in Edwardian England. University of Wisconsin Press, 1985.
  • Mason, Peter. The Brown Dog Affair. Two Sevens Publishing, 1997.
Animal testing
Main articles
Testing on
Issues
Controversial
experiments
Companies
Groups and
campaigns
Writers and
activists
Legislation
Animal welfare
Issues
Concepts
Pain in
nonhuman animals
Organisations
Publications
Activists
and workers
Contemporary
Historical
Scholars
and writers
Contemporary
Historical
Categories
Religious
considerations
Rituals and
festivals
Legislation
Related
Categories: