Misplaced Pages

Antivenom

Milking a snake for the production of antivenom
Clinical data
Other names	antivenin, antivenene
AHFS/Drugs.com	Monograph
Routes of administration	injection
ATC code	J06
Identifiers
ChemSpider	none

Antivenom, also known as antivenin, venom antiserum, and antivenom immunoglobulin, is a specific treatment for envenomation. It is composed of antibodies and used to treat certain venomous bites and stings. Antivenoms are recommended only if there is significant toxicity or a high risk of toxicity. The specific antivenom needed depends on the species involved. It is given by injection.

Side effects may be severe. They include serum sickness, shortness of breath, and allergic reactions including anaphylaxis. Antivenom is traditionally made by collecting venom from the relevant animal and injecting small amounts of it into a domestic animal. The antibodies that form are then collected from the domestic animal's blood and purified.

Versions are available for spider bites, snake bites, fish stings, and scorpion stings. Due to the high cost of producing antibody-based antivenoms and their short shelf lives when not refrigerated, alternative methods of production of antivenoms are being actively explored. One such different method of production involves production from bacteria. Another approach is to develop targeted drugs (which, unlike antibodies, are usually synthetic and easier to manufacture at scale).

Antivenom was first developed in the late 19th century and came into common use in the 1950s. It is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines.

Medical uses

Antivenom is used to treat certain venomous bites and stings. They are recommended only if there is significant toxicity or a high risk of toxicity. The specific antivenom needed depends on the venomous species involved.

In the US, approved antivenom, including for pit viper (rattlesnake, copperhead and water moccasin) snakebite, is based on a purified product made in sheep known as CroFab. It was approved by the FDA in October 2000. U.S. coral snake antivenom ceased production, and remaining stocks of in-date antivenom for coral snakebite expired in fall 2009, leaving the U.S. without a coral snake antivenom. However, as of July 2021, Pfizer has indicated that antivenom is available. Efforts are being made to obtain approval for a coral snake antivenom produced in Mexico which would work against U.S. coral snakebite, but such approval remains speculative.

As an alternative when conventional antivenom is not available, hospitals sometimes use an intravenous version of the antiparalytic drug neostigmine to delay the effects of neurotoxic envenomation through snakebite. Some promising research results have also been reported for administering the drug nasally as a "universal antivenom" for neurotoxic snakebite treatment.

A monovalent antivenom is specific for one toxin or species, while a polyvalent one is effective against multiple toxins or species.

The majority of antivenoms (including all snake antivenoms) are administered intravenously; however, stonefish and redback spider antivenoms are given intramuscularly. The intramuscular route has been questioned in some situations as not uniformly effective.

Side effects

Antivenoms are purified from animal serum by several processes and may contain other serum proteins that can act as immunogens. Some individuals may react to the antivenom with an immediate hypersensitivity reaction (anaphylaxis) or a delayed hypersensitivity (serum sickness) reaction, and antivenom should, therefore, be used with caution. Although rare, severe hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylaxis to antivenom are possible. Despite this caution, antivenom is typically the sole effective treatment for a life-threatening condition, and once the precautions for managing these reactions are in place, an anaphylactoid reaction is not grounds to refuse to give antivenom if otherwise indicated. Although it is a popular myth that a person allergic to horses "cannot" be given antivenom, the side effects are manageable, and antivenom should be given rapidly as the side effects can be managed.

Method of preparation

Most antivenoms are prepared by freeze drying (also called cryodesiccation or lyophilization). The process involves freezing the antisera, followed by application of high vacuum. This causes frozen water to sublimate. Sera is reduced to powder with no water content. In such an environment, microorganisms and enzymes cannot degrade the antivenom, and it can be stored for up to 5 years . Liquid antivenoms may also be stored for 5 years, but they must be stored at low temperatures (below 8 °C/46 °F).

Mechanism

Antivenoms act by binding to and neutralizing venoms. The principle of antivenom is based on that of vaccines, developed by Edward Jenner; however, instead of inducing immunity in the person directly, it is induced in a host animal and the hyperimmunized serum is transfused into the person. The host animals may include horses, donkeys, goats, sheep, rabbits, chickens, llamas, and camels. In addition, opossums are being studied for antivenom production. Antivenoms for medical use are often preserved as freeze-dried ampoules, but some are available only in liquid form and must be kept refrigerated. They are not immediately inactivated by heat, however, so a minor gap in the cold chain is not disastrous.

History

The use of serum from immunized animals as a treatment for disease was pioneered in 1890 by Emil von Behring and Shibasaburo Kitasato, who first demonstrated that the infectious diseases diphtheria and tetanus could be prevented or cured using transfusions from an immune animal to a susceptible one. On February 10, 1894, Albert Calmette at the Pasteur Institute, and independently Césaire Auguste Phisalix and Gabriel Bertrand at the National Museum of National History in France, announced that they had achieved the same result—treatment of a vulnerable animal with serum from an immunized one—this time using snake venom as the source of protection and disease. Calmette went on subsequently to immunize horses using venom from Indian cobras, and the resulting Serum Antivenimeux (antivenomous serum) became the first commercially-available antivenom product.

Natural immunity of snakes to their own venom was observed at least as long ago as 1767, by Felice Fontana in his work Ricerche Fisiche sopra il Veleno della Vipera (Physical Research on the Venom of the Viper). Surgeon-Major Edward Nicholson wrote in the November 1870 Madras Medical Journal that he had witnessed a Burmese snake-catcher inoculating himself with cobra venom. However, the snake-catcher was unsure whether this was actually effective and therefore continued to treat his snakes with care. Nicholson, along with other Britons, began to consider that venom might provide its own cure. Although Scottish surgeon Patrick Russell had noted in the late 18th century that snakes were not affected by their own venom, it was not until the late 19th century that Joseph Fayrer, Lawrence Waddell, and others began to consider venom-based remedies again. However, they and other naturalists working in India did not have the funding to fully develop their theories. In 1895 Sir Thomas Fraser, Professor of Medicine at the University of Edinburgh, picked up Fayrer and Waddell's research to produce a serum to act against cobra venom. His "antivenene" was effective in the laboratory, but failed to make an impact as the public were focused on contemporary Pasteurian discoveries.

In 1901, Vital Brazil, working at the Instituto Butantan in São Paulo, Brazil, developed the first monovalent and polyvalent antivenoms for Central and South American Crotalus and Bothrops genera, as well as for certain species of venomous spiders, scorpions, and frogs. In Mexico in 1905, Daniel Vergara Lope developed an antivenom against scorpion venom, by immunizing dogs. In Australia, the Commonwealth Serum Laboratories (CSL) began antivenom research in the 1920s. CSL has developed antivenoms for the redback spider, funnel-web spiders and all deadly Australian snakes. In the USA, the H.K. Mulford company began producing "Nearctic Crotalidae antivenin" in 1927, via a consortium called the Antivenin Institute of America.

Over time, a variety of improvements have been made in the specificity, potency, and purity of antivenom products, including "salting out" with ammonium sulphate or caprylic acid, enzymatic reduction of antibodies with papain or with pepsin, affinity purification, and a variety of other measures. Many equine facilities now use plasmapheresis to collect blood plasma instead of blood serum.

Availability

There is an overall shortage of antivenom to treat snakebites. Because of this shortage, clinical researchers are considering whether lower doses may be as effective as higher doses in severe neurotoxic snake envenoming.

Antivenom undergoes successive price markups after manufacturing, by licencees, wholesalers and hospitals. When weighed against profitability (especially for sale in poorer regions), the result is that many snake antivenoms, world-wide, are very expensive. Availability, from region to region, also varies.

Internationally, antivenoms must conform to the standards of pharmacopoeia and the World Health Organization (WHO).

In 2024 researchers have discovered a synthetic antibody that can neutralize a key type of neurotoxin produced by four different deadly snake species from South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Africa. This might be a step toward an antivenom that could be used on any of the 200 or so dangerous venomous snakes throughout the world.

Antivenoms have been developed for the venoms associated with the following animals:

Spiders

Acarids

Insects

Scorpions

Marine animals

Snakes

Terminology

The name "antivenin" comes from the French word venin, meaning venom, which in turn was derived from Latin venenum, meaning poison.

Historically, the term antivenin was predominant around the world, its first published use being in 1895. In 1981, the World Health Organization decided that the preferred terminology in the English language would be venom and antivenom rather than venin and antivenin or venen and antivenene.

References

1. ^ World Health Organization (2009). Stuart MC, Kouimtzi M, Hill SR (eds.). WHO Model Formulary 2008. World Health Organization. pp. 396–397. hdl:10665/44053. ISBN 9789241547659.
2. ^ Dart RC (2004). Medical Toxicology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. pp. 250–251. ISBN 9780781728454. Archived from the original on 2017-01-09.
3. British national formulary : BNF 69 (69 ed.). British Medical Association. 2015. p. 43. ISBN 9780857111562.
4. Knudsen C, Laustsen AH (April 2018). "Recent Advances in Next Generation Snakebite Antivenoms". Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 3 (2): 42. doi:10.3390/tropicalmed3020042. PMC 6073149. PMID 30274438.
5. Molteni M. "Bacteria Are Brewing Up the Next Generation of Antivenoms". Wired – via www.wired.com.
6. "How to simplify the treatment of snake bites". The Economist. 2021-01-02. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 2021-01-02.
7. Gad SC (2007). Handbook of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. John Wiley & Sons. p. 692. ISBN 9780470117101. Archived from the original on 2017-01-09.
8. World Health Organization (2019). World Health Organization model list of essential medicines: 21st list 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization. hdl:10665/325771. WHO/MVP/EMP/IAU/2019.06. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
9. "CroFab Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine)". SavageLabs.com. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2016-02-08. Link to PDF for full prescribing information, retrieved 11/11/12
10. "Antivenin (Micrurus fulvius equine origin) North American Coral Snake Antivenin". Pfizer Hospital US. Archived from the original on 1 March 2021. Retrieved 9 July 2021.
11. "Coral Snake & Antivenom FAQ's". Florida Poison Information Center - Tampa. May 2017. Archived from the original on 2019-11-01. Retrieved October 31, 2019.
12. "North American Micrurus (Coral Snake Venoms)". Toxnet: Toxicology Data Network. September 15, 2015. Retrieved October 31, 2019.
13. Franklin, Deborah, "Potential Treatment For Snakebites Leads To A Paralyzing Test Shortages of coral snake antivenom were previously reported, but one source states that production has resumed and, as of July 2021, Pfizer indicates that antivenom is available. Archived 2014-08-09 at the Wayback Machine", NPR.org, July 31, 2013.
14. "Universal antidote for snakebite: Experimental trial represents promising step Archived 2014-07-07 at the Wayback Machine", California Academy of Sciences via Science Daily, May 28, 2014.
15. Whyte I (2012). "Antivenom update" (PDF). Australian Prescriber. 35 (5): 152–155. doi:10.18773/austprescr.2012.069.
16. Isbister GK (December 2002). "Failure of intramuscular antivenom in Red-back spider envenoming". Emergency Medicine. 14 (4): 436–439. doi:10.1046/j.1442-2026.2002.00356.x. PMID 12534488.
17. Bhoite RR, Bhoite GR, Bagdure DN, Bawaskar HS (2015). "Anaphylaxis to scorpion antivenin and its management following envenomation by Indian red scorpion, Mesobuthus tamulus". Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine. 19 (9): 547–549. doi:10.4103/0972-5229.164807. PMC 4578200. PMID 26430342.
18. See, for example, the Antivenom Precautions paragraph of the Medication section of Forster J (2006-03-14). "Snake Envenomations, Sea". eMedicine Emergency Medicine (environmental). Archived from the original on 26 June 2006. Retrieved 2006-06-25.
19. Warrell D (2016). Guidelines for the management of snakebites (2nd ed.). New Delhi: World Health Organization. p. 111,136,192. ISBN 9788177394979.
20. Gad S. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. p. 692.
21. ^ "Guidelines for the production, control and regulation of snake antivenom immunoglobulins" (PDF). WHO Technical Series No, 1004. WHO. 2017. Retrieved 15 January 2020.
22. "Opossum Compounds Isolated to Help Make Antivenom". Scientific American. 2015-03-30. Retrieved 2020-02-01.
23. "Ueber das Zustandekommen der Diphtherie-Immunität und der Tetanus-Immunität bei Thieren". Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift. 16 (49): 1113–1114. December 1890. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1207589. ISSN 0012-0472. S2CID 80469638.
24. Bochner R (8 June 2016). "Paths to the discovery of antivenom serotherapy in France". Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases. 22 (20): 20. doi:10.1186/s40409-016-0074-7. PMC 4898362. PMID 27279829.
25. "Venoms, venomous animals and antivenomous serum-therapeutics / by A. Calmette ; translated by Ernest E. Austen". Wellcome Collection. Retrieved 2023-05-24.
26. "Serum Antivenimeux Desseche, 10cc - Dried Antivenin Serum for Snake Bites". Smithsonian Institution. Retrieved 2023-05-24.
27. Fontana F (1767). Ricerche fisiche sopra il veleno della vipera. Wellcome Library. In Lucca : Nella stamperia di Jacopo Giusti.
28. Bhaumik R (2018-11-01). "Colonial Encounter on Indian Snakes and their Venoms: The Transmission and Transformation of Western Ophiological Knowledge in British India, 1780s-1910s" (PDF). Indian Journal of History of Science. 53 (4). doi:10.16943/ijhs/2018/v53i4/49536. ISSN 0019-5235.
29. Bhaumik R (2018-11-01). "Colonial Encounter on Indian Snakes and their Venoms: The Transmission and Transformation of Western Ophiological Knowledge in British India, 1780s-1910s" (PDF). Indian Journal of History of Science. 53 (4). doi:10.16943/ijhs/2018/v53i4/49536. ISSN 0019-5235.
30. De Franco M, Kalil J (July 2014). "The Butantan Institute: history and future perspectives". PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 8 (7): e2862. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002862. PMC 4080994. PMID 24992341.
31. Jean-Philippe C, Alfredo C, Leslie B, Alejandro A (December 2020). "Factors involved in the resilience of incidence and decrease of mortality from scorpion stings in Mexico". Toxicon. 188: 65–75. Bibcode:2020Txcn..188...65C. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.10.011. PMID 33065199. S2CID 223558071.
32. "CSL antivenoms 1956". Power House Museum. Archived from the original on 7 August 2016. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
33. "Antivenin Nearctic Crotalidae - North American Anti-Snake-Bite Serum". Smithsonian Institution. Retrieved 2023-05-24.
34. do Amaral A (1927). Bulletin of the Antiven Institute of America. Vol. 1 (1st ed.). US: Antivenin Institute of America.
35. Rojas G, Jiménez JM, Gutiérrez JM (March 1994). "Caprylic acid fractionation of hyperimmune horse plasma: description of a simple procedure for antivenom production". Toxicon. 32 (3): 351–363. Bibcode:1994Txcn...32..351R. doi:10.1016/0041-0101(94)90087-6. PMID 8016856.
36. Boyer L, Degan J, Ruha AM, Mallie J, Mangin E, Alagón A (December 2013). "Safety of intravenous equine F(ab')2: insights following clinical trials involving 1534 recipients of scorpion antivenom". Toxicon. 76: 386–393. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.07.017. PMID 23916602.
37. Levine L, Broderick EJ (1970). "The plasmapheresis of hyperimmunized horses". Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 42 (6): 998–1000. hdl:10665/262354. PMC 2427561. PMID 5312259.
38. "Horses Key To Making Antivenom Up For FDA Approval". Fronteras. 2011-08-02. Retrieved 2023-05-24.
39. Agarwal R, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Behera D, Jindal SK (June 2005). "Low dose of snake antivenom is as effective as high dose in patients with severe neurotoxic snake envenoming". Emergency Medicine Journal. 22 (6): 397–399. doi:10.1136/emj.2004.020727. PMC 1726801. PMID 15911942.
40. Lewis D (11 September 2015). "Why a Single Vial of Antivenom Can Cost $14,000". Smithsonian. Retrieved 9 January 2017.
41. "Antivenom Supply for Snake bites". www.pharmaceutical-technology.com. 24 April 2019.
42. Theakston RD, Warrell DA, Griffiths E (April 2003). "Report of a WHO workshop on the standardization and control of antivenoms". Toxicon. 41 (5): 541–57. Bibcode:2003Txcn...41..541T. doi:10.1016/S0041-0101(02)00393-8. PMID 12676433.
43. Wilcox C (2024-02-21). "Powerful new antivenom raises hopes for a universal solution to lethal snakebites". doi:10.1126/science.zqvsmhr. Retrieved 2024-10-16.
44. Khalek IS, Senji Laxme RR, Kim Nguyen YT, Khochare S, Patel RN, Woehl J, et al. (2024). "Synthetic development of a broadly neutralizing antibody against snake venom long-chain α-neurotoxins". Science Translational Medicine. 16 (735). doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.adk1867. PMID 38381847. eadk1867.
45. "Appendix: Antivenom Tables". Clinical Toxicology. 41 (3): 317–327. 2003. doi:10.1081/CLT-120021117. S2CID 218867125.
46. Calvete JJ, Arias AS, Rodríguez Y, Quesada-Bernat S, Sánchez LV, Chippaux JP, et al. (September 2016). "Preclinical evaluation of three polyspecific antivenoms against the venom of Echis ocellatus: Neutralization of toxic activities and antivenomics". Toxicon. 119. Elsevier: 280–288. Bibcode:2016Txcn..119..280C. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2016.06.022. PMID 27377229.
47. Snake Antivenom for Sub – Sharan Africa EchiTAbG (PDF), World Health Organization, 20 June 2019, retrieved 14 December 2019
48. Spawls S, Branch B (1995). The Dangerous Snakes of Africa. Ralph Curtis Books. Dubai: Oriental Press. p. 192. ISBN 0-88359-029-8.
49. Weinstein SA (September 2015). "Snake venoms: A brief treatise on etymology, origins of terminology, and definitions". Toxicon. 103. Elsevier: 188–195. Bibcode:2015Txcn..103..188W. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2015.07.005. PMID 26166305.
50. "Antivenin". Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Merriam-Webster.
51. World Health Organization (1981). Progress in the characterization of venoms and standardization of antivenoms. Geneva: WHO Offset Publications. p. 5. ISBN 92-4-170058-0.

External links

• Antivenom Index, a joint project of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums and the American Association of Poison Control Centers which helps locate rare antivenoms
• Venom Response Program of the Miami-Dade Fire Rescue service

• Medicine

• Toxicology treatments
• Polyclonal antibodies
• Antitoxins
• World Health Organization essential medicines