In mathematics, the Askey–Gasper inequality is an inequality for Jacobi polynomials proved by Richard Askey and George Gasper (1976 ) and used in the proof of the Bieberbach conjecture .
Statement
It states that if
β
≥
0
{\displaystyle \beta \geq 0}
,
α
+
β
≥
−
2
{\displaystyle \alpha +\beta \geq -2}
, and
−
1
≤
x
≤
1
{\displaystyle -1\leq x\leq 1}
then
∑
k
=
0
n
P
k
(
α
,
β
)
(
x
)
P
k
(
β
,
α
)
(
1
)
≥
0
{\displaystyle \sum _{k=0}^{n}{\frac {P_{k}^{(\alpha ,\beta )}(x)}{P_{k}^{(\beta ,\alpha )}(1)}}\geq 0}
where
P
k
(
α
,
β
)
(
x
)
{\displaystyle P_{k}^{(\alpha ,\beta )}(x)}
is a Jacobi polynomial.
The case when
β
=
0
{\displaystyle \beta =0}
can also be written as
3
F
2
(
−
n
,
n
+
α
+
2
,
1
2
(
α
+
1
)
;
1
2
(
α
+
3
)
,
α
+
1
;
t
)
>
0
,
0
≤
t
<
1
,
α
>
−
1.
{\displaystyle {}_{3}F_{2}\left(-n,n+\alpha +2,{\tfrac {1}{2}}(\alpha +1);{\tfrac {1}{2}}(\alpha +3),\alpha +1;t\right)>0,\qquad 0\leq t<1,\quad \alpha >-1.}
In this form, with α a non-negative integer, the inequality was used by Louis de Branges in his proof of the Bieberbach conjecture .
Proof
Ekhad (1993 ) gave a short proof of this inequality, by combining the identity
(
α
+
2
)
n
n
!
×
3
F
2
(
−
n
,
n
+
α
+
2
,
1
2
(
α
+
1
)
;
1
2
(
α
+
3
)
,
α
+
1
;
t
)
=
=
(
1
2
)
j
(
α
2
+
1
)
n
−
j
(
α
2
+
3
2
)
n
−
2
j
(
α
+
1
)
n
−
2
j
j
!
(
α
2
+
3
2
)
n
−
j
(
α
2
+
1
2
)
n
−
2
j
(
n
−
2
j
)
!
×
3
F
2
(
−
n
+
2
j
,
n
−
2
j
+
α
+
1
,
1
2
(
α
+
1
)
;
1
2
(
α
+
2
)
,
α
+
1
;
t
)
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {(\alpha +2)_{n}}{n!}}&\times {}_{3}F_{2}\left(-n,n+\alpha +2,{\tfrac {1}{2}}(\alpha +1);{\tfrac {1}{2}}(\alpha +3),\alpha +1;t\right)=\\&={\frac {\left({\tfrac {1}{2}}\right)_{j}\left({\tfrac {\alpha }{2}}+1\right)_{n-j}\left({\tfrac {\alpha }{2}}+{\tfrac {3}{2}}\right)_{n-2j}(\alpha +1)_{n-2j}}{j!\left({\tfrac {\alpha }{2}}+{\tfrac {3}{2}}\right)_{n-j}\left({\tfrac {\alpha }{2}}+{\tfrac {1}{2}}\right)_{n-2j}(n-2j)!}}\times {}_{3}F_{2}\left(-n+2j,n-2j+\alpha +1,{\tfrac {1}{2}}(\alpha +1);{\tfrac {1}{2}}(\alpha +2),\alpha +1;t\right)\end{aligned}}}
with the Clausen inequality .
Generalizations
Gasper & Rahman (2004 , 8.9) give some generalizations of the Askey–Gasper inequality to basic hypergeometric series .
See also
References
Askey, Richard ; Gasper, George (1976), "Positive Jacobi polynomial sums. II", American Journal of Mathematics , 98 (3): 709–737, doi :10.2307/2373813 , ISSN 0002-9327 , JSTOR 2373813 , MR 0430358
Askey, Richard; Gasper, George (1986), "Inequalities for polynomials" , in Baernstein, Albert; Drasin, David; Duren, Peter; Marden, Albert (eds.), The Bieberbach conjecture (West Lafayette, Ind., 1985) , Math. Surveys Monogr., vol. 21, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society , pp. 7–32, ISBN 978-0-8218-1521-2 , MR 0875228
Ekhad, Shalosh B. (1993), Delest, M.; Jacob, G.; Leroux, P. (eds.), "A short, elementary, and easy, WZ proof of the Askey-Gasper inequality that was used by de Branges in his proof of the Bieberbach conjecture", Theoretical Computer Science , Conference on Formal Power Series and Algebraic Combinatorics (Bordeaux, 1991), 117 (1): 199–202, doi :10.1016/0304-3975(93)90313-I , ISSN 0304-3975 , MR 1235178
Gasper, George; Rahman, Mizan (2004), Basic hypergeometric series , Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 96 (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press , ISBN 978-0-521-83357-8 , MR 2128719
Categories :
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
**DISCLAIMER** We are not affiliated with Wikipedia, and Cloudflare.
The information presented on this site is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice.
You should always have a personal consultation with a healthcare professional before making changes to your diet, medication, or exercise routine.
AI helps with the correspondence in our chat.
We participate in an affiliate program. If you buy something through a link, we may earn a commission 💕
↑