Baldwin v. New York - Misplaced Pages

Not to be confused with Baldwin v. United States.

1970 United States Supreme Court case

Baldwin v. New York
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued Dec 9, 1969 Decided June 22, 1970
Full case name	Robert Baldwin v. State of New York
Citations	399 U.S. 66 (more)90 S. Ct. 1886; 26 L. Ed. 2d 437
Argument	Oral argument
Case history
Prior	Hogan v. Rosenberg, 58 Misc. 2d 585, 296 N.Y.S.2d 584 (Sup. Ct. 1968) Affirmed in part, reversed in part, 24 N.Y.2d 207, 247 N.E.2d 260 (1969) Reargument denied sub. nom., People v. Baldwin, 27 N.Y.2d 737, 262 N.E.2d 683 (1970) Probable jurisdiction noted, Baldwin v. New York, 395 U.S. 932 (1969)
Holding
A defendant accused of a serious offense must be afforded the right to a trial by jury, while a petty offense does not give a defendant a right to a jury trial.
Court membership
Chief Justice Warren E. Burger Associate Justices Hugo Black · William O. Douglas John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr. Potter Stewart · Byron White Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Case opinions
Majority	White, joined by Brennan and Marshall
Concurrence	Black, joined by Douglas
Dissent	Burger
Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970), was a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that defendants have a Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial for offenses requiring imprisonment of more than six months.

Background

Robert Baldwin was arrested in New York City for "jostling". Under the New York City Criminal Court Act, his trial was conducted without a jury, despite his request for a jury trial. Baldwin was convicted and sentenced to one year in prison, following which he appealed the case, arguing that the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution granted him the right to a jury trial.

Duncan v. Louisiana

Main article: Duncan v. Louisiana

In 1968, the Warren court incorporated the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial and applied it to the states. In Duncan, the defendant had been convicted of battery, which under Louisiana law was punishable by up to two years in prison. The majority opinion, authored by Justice Byron White, noted that in 49 of the 50 states, "petty offenses" were punishable by no more than one year in jail. Therefore, a crime with a possible two-year sentence was out of step with the common law definition of "petty" thus necessitating a right to trial by jury.

Decision

The majority opinion, authored by Justice Byron White, narrowed the decision of Duncan v. Louisiana by holding that a right to a jury trial is required for all crimes where the penalty exceeds six months imprisonment. The opinion explicitly disagreed with the prosecution's argument that the line should be drawn between misdemeanor and felony, and noted that every other state had reduced punishment for non-jury trials to no more than six months.

References

^ Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970).
"Baldwin v. New York". Case Briefs. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968).

External links

Text of Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970) is available from: Cornell Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)

Categories: