Misplaced Pages

Batchelor–Chandrasekhar equation

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

The Batchelor–Chandrasekhar equation is the evolution equation for the scalar functions, defining the two-point velocity correlation tensor of a homogeneous axisymmetric turbulence, named after George Batchelor and Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar. They developed the theory of homogeneous axisymmetric turbulence based on Howard P. Robertson's work on isotropic turbulence using an invariant principle. This equation is an extension of Kármán–Howarth equation from isotropic to axisymmetric turbulence.

Mathematical description

The theory is based on the principle that the statistical properties are invariant for rotations about a particular direction λ {\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\lambda }}} (say), and reflections in planes containing λ {\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\lambda }}} and perpendicular to λ {\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\lambda }}} . This type of axisymmetry is sometimes referred to as strong axisymmetry or axisymmetry in the strong sense, opposed to weak axisymmetry, where reflections in planes perpendicular to λ {\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\lambda }}} or planes containing λ {\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\lambda }}} are not allowed.

Let the two-point correlation for homogeneous turbulence be

R i j ( r , t ) = u i ( x , t ) u j ( x + r , t ) ¯ . {\displaystyle R_{ij}(\mathbf {r} ,t)={\overline {u_{i}(\mathbf {x} ,t)u_{j}(\mathbf {x} +\mathbf {r} ,t)}}.}

A single scalar describes this correlation tensor in isotropic turbulence, whereas, it turns out for axisymmetric turbulence, two scalar functions are enough to uniquely specify the correlation tensor. In fact, Batchelor was unable to express the correlation tensor in terms of two scalar functions, but ended up with four scalar functions, nevertheless, Chandrasekhar showed that it could be expressed with only two scalar functions by expressing the solenoidal axisymmetric tensor as the curl of a general axisymmetric skew tensor (reflectionally non-invariant tensor).

Let λ {\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\lambda }}} be the unit vector which defines the axis of symmetry of the flow, then we have two scalar variables, r r = r 2 {\displaystyle \mathbf {r} \cdot \mathbf {r} =r^{2}} and r λ = r μ {\displaystyle \mathbf {r} \cdot {\boldsymbol {\lambda }}=r\mu } . Since | λ | = 1 {\displaystyle |{\boldsymbol {\lambda }}|=1} , it is clear that μ {\displaystyle \mu } represents the cosine of the angle between λ {\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\lambda }}} and r {\displaystyle \mathbf {r} } . Let Q 1 ( r , μ , t ) {\displaystyle Q_{1}(r,\mu ,t)} and Q 2 ( r , μ , t ) {\displaystyle Q_{2}(r,\mu ,t)} be the two scalar functions that describes the correlation function, then the most general axisymmetric tensor which is solenoidal (incompressible) is given by,

R i j = A r i r j + B δ i j + C λ i λ j + D ( λ i r j + r i λ j ) {\displaystyle R_{ij}=Ar_{i}r_{j}+B\delta _{ij}+C\lambda _{i}\lambda _{j}+D\left(\lambda _{i}r_{j}+r_{i}\lambda _{j}\right)}

where

A = ( D r D μ μ ) Q 1 + D r Q 2 , B = [ ( r 2 D r + r μ D μ + 2 ) + r 2 ( 1 μ 2 ) D μ μ r μ D μ ] Q 1 [ r 2 ( 1 μ 2 ) D r + 1 ] Q 2 , C = r 2 D μ μ Q 1 + ( r 2 D r + 1 ) Q 2 , D = ( r μ D μ + 1 ) D μ Q 1 r μ D r Q 2 . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}A&=\left(D_{r}-D_{\mu \mu }\right)Q_{1}+D_{r}Q_{2},\\B&=\leftQ_{1}-\leftQ_{2},\\C&=-r^{2}D_{\mu \mu }Q_{1}+\left(r^{2}D_{r}+1\right)Q_{2},\\D&=\left(r\mu D_{\mu }+1\right)D_{\mu }Q_{1}-r\mu D_{r}Q_{2}.\end{aligned}}}

The differential operators appearing in the above expressions are defined as

D r = 1 r r μ r 2 μ , D μ = 1 r μ , D μ μ = D μ D μ = 1 r 2 2 μ 2 . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}D_{r}&={\frac {1}{r}}{\frac {\partial }{\partial r}}-{\frac {\mu }{r^{2}}}{\frac {\partial }{\partial \mu }},\\D_{\mu }&={\frac {1}{r}}{\frac {\partial }{\partial \mu }},\\D_{\mu \mu }&=D_{\mu }D_{\mu }={\frac {1}{r^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial \mu ^{2}}}.\end{aligned}}}

Then the evolution equations (equivalent form of Kármán–Howarth equation) for the two scalar functions are given by

Q 1 t = 2 ν Δ Q 1 + S 1 , Q 2 t = 2 ν ( Δ Q 2 + 2 D μ μ Q 1 ) + S 2 {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {\partial Q_{1}}{\partial t}}&=2\nu \Delta Q_{1}+S_{1},\\{\frac {\partial Q_{2}}{\partial t}}&=2\nu \left(\Delta Q_{2}+2D_{\mu \mu }Q_{1}\right)+S_{2}\end{aligned}}}

where ν {\displaystyle \nu } is the kinematic viscosity and

Δ = 2 r 2 + 4 r r + 1 μ 2 r 2 2 μ 2 4 μ r 2 μ . {\displaystyle \Delta ={\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial r^{2}}}+{\frac {4}{r}}{\frac {\partial }{\partial r}}+{\frac {1-\mu ^{2}}{r^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial \mu ^{2}}}-{\frac {4\mu }{r^{2}}}{\frac {\partial }{\partial \mu }}.}

The scalar functions S 1 ( r , μ , t ) {\displaystyle S_{1}(r,\mu ,t)} and S 2 ( r , μ , t ) {\displaystyle S_{2}(r,\mu ,t)} are related to triply correlated tensor S i j {\displaystyle S_{ij}} , exactly the same way Q 1 ( r , μ , t ) {\displaystyle Q_{1}(r,\mu ,t)} and Q 2 ( r , μ , t ) {\displaystyle Q_{2}(r,\mu ,t)} are related to the two point correlated tensor R i j {\displaystyle R_{ij}} . The triply correlated tensor is

S i j = r k ( u i ( x , t ) u k ( x , t ) u j ( x + r , t ) ¯ u i ( x , t ) u k ( x + r , t ) u j ( x + r , t ) ¯ ) + 1 ρ ( p ( x , t ) u j ( x + r , t ) ¯ r i p ( x + r , t ) u i ( x , t ) ¯ r j ) . {\displaystyle S_{ij}={\frac {\partial }{\partial r_{k}}}\left({\overline {u_{i}(\mathbf {x} ,t)u_{k}(\mathbf {x} ,t)u_{j}(\mathbf {x} +\mathbf {r} ,t)}}-{\overline {u_{i}(\mathbf {x} ,t)u_{k}(\mathbf {x} +\mathbf {r} ,t)u_{j}(\mathbf {x} +\mathbf {r} ,t)}}\right)+{\frac {1}{\rho }}\left({\frac {\overline {\partial p(\mathbf {x} ,t)u_{j}(\mathbf {x} +\mathbf {r} ,t)}}{\partial r_{i}}}-{\frac {\overline {\partial p(\mathbf {x} +\mathbf {r} ,t)u_{i}(\mathbf {x} ,t)}}{\partial r_{j}}}\right).}

Here ρ {\displaystyle \rho } is the density of the fluid.

Properties

  • The trace of the correlation tensor reduces to
R i i = r 2 ( 1 μ 2 ) ( D μ μ Q 1 D r Q 2 ) 2 Q 2 2 ( r 2 D r + 2 r μ D μ + 3 ) Q 1 . {\displaystyle R_{ii}=r^{2}\left(1-\mu ^{2}\right)\left(D_{\mu \mu }Q_{1}-D_{r}Q_{2}\right)-2Q_{2}-2\left(r^{2}D_{r}+2r\mu D_{\mu }+3\right)Q_{1}.}
  • The homogeneity condition R i j ( r ) = R j i ( r ) {\displaystyle R_{ij}(-\mathbf {r} )=R_{ji}(\mathbf {r} )} implies that both Q 1 {\displaystyle Q_{1}} and Q 2 {\displaystyle Q_{2}} are even functions of r {\displaystyle r} and r μ {\displaystyle r\mu } .

Decay of the turbulence

During decay, if we neglect the triple correlation scalars, then the equations reduce to axially symmetric five-dimensional heat equations,

Q 1 t = 2 ν Δ Q 1 , Q 2 t = 2 ν ( Δ Q 2 + 2 D μ μ Q 1 ) {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {\partial Q_{1}}{\partial t}}&=2\nu \Delta Q_{1},\\{\frac {\partial Q_{2}}{\partial t}}&=2\nu \left(\Delta Q_{2}+2D_{\mu \mu }Q_{1}\right)\end{aligned}}}

Solutions to these five-dimensional heat equation was solved by Chandrasekhar. The initial conditions can be expressed in terms of Gegenbauer polynomials (without loss of generality),

Q 1 ( r , μ , 0 ) = n = 0 q 2 n ( 1 ) ( r ) C 2 n 3 2 ( μ ) , Q 2 ( r , μ , 0 ) = n = 0 q 2 n ( 2 ) ( r ) C 2 n 3 2 ( μ ) , {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}Q_{1}(r,\mu ,0)&=\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }q_{2n}^{(1)}(r)C_{2n}^{\frac {3}{2}}(\mu ),\\Q_{2}(r,\mu ,0)&=\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }q_{2n}^{(2)}(r)C_{2n}^{\frac {3}{2}}(\mu ),\end{aligned}}}

where C 2 n 3 2 ( μ ) {\displaystyle C_{2n}^{\frac {3}{2}}(\mu )} are Gegenbauer polynomials. The required solutions are

Q 1 ( r , μ , t ) = e r 2 8 ν t 32 ( ν t ) 5 2 n = 0 C 2 n 3 2 ( μ ) 0 e r 2 8 ν t r 4 q 2 n ( 1 ) ( r ) I 2 n + 3 2 ( r r 4 ν t ) ( r r 4 ν t ) 3 2   d r , Q 2 ( r , μ , t ) = e r 2 8 ν t 32 ( ν t ) 5 2 n = 0 C 2 n 3 2 ( μ ) 0 e r 2 8 ν t r 4 q 2 n ( 2 ) ( r ) I 2 n + 3 2 ( r r 4 ν t ) ( r r 4 ν t ) 3 2   d r + 4 ν 0 t d t [ 8 π ν ( t t ) ] 5 2 ( 1 r 2 2 Q 1 μ 2 ) r , μ , t e | r r | 2 8 ν ( t t )   d x 1 d x 5 , {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}Q_{1}(r,\mu ,t)&={\frac {e^{-{\frac {r^{2}}{8\nu t}}}}{32(\nu t)^{\frac {5}{2}}}}\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }C_{2n}^{\frac {3}{2}}(\mu )\int _{0}^{\infty }e^{-{\frac {r'^{2}}{8\nu t}}}r'^{4}q_{2n}^{(1)}(r'){\frac {I_{2n+{\frac {3}{2}}}\left({\frac {rr'}{4\nu t}}\right)}{\left({\frac {rr'}{4\nu t}}\right)^{\frac {3}{2}}}}\ dr',\\Q_{2}(r,\mu ,t)&={\frac {e^{-{\frac {r^{2}}{8\nu t}}}}{32(\nu t)^{\frac {5}{2}}}}\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }C_{2n}^{\frac {3}{2}}(\mu )\int _{0}^{\infty }e^{-{\frac {r'^{2}}{8\nu t}}}r'^{4}q_{2n}^{(2)}(r'){\frac {I_{2n+{\frac {3}{2}}}\left({\frac {rr'}{4\nu t}}\right)}{\left({\frac {rr'}{4\nu t}}\right)^{\frac {3}{2}}}}\ dr'+4\nu \int _{0}^{t}{\frac {dt'}{^{\frac {5}{2}}}}\int \cdots \int \left({\frac {1}{r^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}Q_{1}}{\partial \mu ^{2}}}\right)_{r',\mu ',t'}e^{-{\frac {|r-r'|^{2}}{8\nu (t-t')}}}\ dx_{1}'\cdots dx_{5}',\end{aligned}}}

where I 2 n + 3 2 {\displaystyle I_{2n+{\frac {3}{2}}}} is the Bessel function of the first kind.

As t , {\displaystyle t\to \infty ,} the solutions become independent of μ {\displaystyle \mu }

Q 1 ( r , μ , t ) Λ 1 e r 2 8 ν t 48 2 π ( ν t ) 5 2 , Q 2 ( r , μ , t ) Λ 2 e r 2 8 ν t 48 2 π ( ν t ) 5 2 , {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}Q_{1}(r,\mu ,t)&\to -{\frac {\Lambda _{1}e^{-{\frac {r^{2}}{8\nu t}}}}{48{\sqrt {2\pi }}(\nu t)^{\frac {5}{2}}}},\\Q_{2}(r,\mu ,t)&\to -{\frac {\Lambda _{2}e^{-{\frac {r^{2}}{8\nu t}}}}{48{\sqrt {2\pi }}(\nu t)^{\frac {5}{2}}}},\end{aligned}}}

where

Λ 1 = 0 q 2 n ( 1 ) ( r )   d r Λ 2 = 0 q 2 n ( 2 ) ( r )   d r {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\Lambda _{1}&=-\int _{0}^{\infty }q_{2n}^{(1)}(r)\ dr\\\Lambda _{2}&=-\int _{0}^{\infty }q_{2n}^{(2)}(r)\ dr\end{aligned}}}

See also

References

  1. Batchelor, G. K. (1946). The theory of axisymmetric turbulence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 186(1007), 480–502.
  2. Chandrasekhar, S. (1950). The theory of axisymmetric turbulence. Royal Society of London.
  3. Chandrasekhar, S. (1950). The decay of axisymmetric turbulence. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 203, 358–364.
  4. Davidson, P. (2015). Turbulence: an introduction for scientists and engineers. Oxford University Press, USA. Appendix 5
  5. Robertson, H. P. (1940, April). The invariant theory of isotropic turbulence. In Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 209–223). Cambridge University Press.
  6. Lindborg, E. (1995). Kinematics of homogeneous axisymmetric tubulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 302, 179-201.
Categories: