Misplaced Pages

This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (July 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Breaking the Spell

Author	Daniel C. Dennett
Language	English
Subject	Psychology of religion
Publisher	Viking (Penguin)
Publication date	2006
Publication place	United States
Media type	Print
ISBN	978-0-14-303833-7
Dewey Decimal	200 22
LC Class	BL2775.3 .D46 2006
Preceded by	Sweet Dreams

Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon is a 2006 book by American philosopher and cognitive scientist Daniel Dennett, in which the author argues that religion is in need of scientific analysis so that its nature and future may be better understood. The "spell" that requires "breaking" is not religious belief itself but the belief that it is off-limits to or beyond scientific inquiry.

Synopsis

The book is divided into three parts. Dennett's working definition of religions is: "social systems whose participants avow belief in a supernatural agent or agents whose approval is to be sought". He notes that this definition is "a place to start, not something carved in stone".

Part I

Part I discusses the motivation and justification for the entire project: Can science study religion? Should science study religion? Dennett addresses the proposal by Stephen Jay Gould that science and religion represent non-overlapping magisteria (NOMA); science dealing with facts while religion deals with values, morality, and personal meanings. Noting that NOMA drew few adherents from either side, and that Gould's thesis is itself based upon a scientific view of the issues, Dennett concludes that religion must be open to scientific investigation.

Part II

After answering in the affirmative, Part II proceeds to use the tools of evolutionary biology and memetics to suggest possible theories regarding the origin of religion and subsequent evolution of modern religions from ancient folk beliefs.

Part III

Part III analyzes religion and its effects in today's world: Does religion make us moral? Is religion what gives meaning to life? What should we teach the children? Dennett bases much of his analysis on empirical evidence, though he often points out that much more research in this field is needed.

Critical reception

The book has received differing reviews from various consumer, mass media outlets.

The Guardian

The Guardian's Andrew Brown describes it as giving "a very forceful and lucid account of the reasons why we need to study religious behaviour as a human phenomenon".

Scientific American

In Scientific American, George Johnson describes the book's main draw as being "a sharp synthesis of a library of evolutionary, anthropological and psychological research on the origin and spread of religion".

New Yorker

In The New Yorker, evolutionary biologist H. Allen Orr described the book as "an accessible account of what might be called the natural history of religion".

The New York Review of Books

In The New York Review of Books, Freeman Dyson wrote:

After Dennett's harsh depiction of the moral evils associated with religion, his last chapter, "Now What Do We Do?," is bland and conciliatory. "So, in the end," he says, "my central policy recommendation is that we gently, firmly educate the people of the world, so that they can make truly informed choices about their lives." This recommendation sounds harmless enough. Why can we not all agree with it? Unfortunately, it conceals fundamental disagreements. To give the recommendation a concrete meaning, the meaning of the little word "we" must be specified. Who are the "we" who are to educate the people of the world? At stake is the political control of religious education, the most contentious of all the issues that religion poses to modern societies. "We" might be the parents of the children to be educated, or a local school board, or a national ministry of education, or a legally established ecclesiastical authority, or an international group of philosophers sharing Dennett's views. Of all these possibilities, the last is the least likely to be implemented. Dennett's recommendation leaves the practical problems of regulating religious education unsolved. Until we can agree about the meaning of "we," the recommendation to "gently, firmly educate the people of the world" will only cause further dissension between religious believers and well-meaning philosophers.

From the religious community

The New York Times

Leon Wieseltier, former member of the editorial board of the Jewish Review of Books, called the book, in The New York Times, "a sorry instance of present-day scientism" and alleged it to be "a merry anthology of contemporary superstitions".

The New Atlantis

A professor of a private, Catholic university and outspoken critic of the environmentalist movement, Charles T. Rubin, likened Dennett in The New Atlantis to "a tone-deaf music scholar", criticized his "unwillingness to admit the limits of scientific rationality" and accused him of "deploying the same old Enlightenment tropes that didn't work all that well the first time around".

Philosophical reception

Thomas Nagel said that Dennett's book was 'beneath him' and Edward Feser has extensively critiqued his book, criticising his interpretation of theistic arguments, whilst maintaining praise for his passages on cognitive neuroscience. Roger Scruton both praised and criticised Dennett's book in his book On Human Nature, endorsing his intellectual bravery and imaginative writing, yet criticising his reliance on the meme theory, and remaining sceptical of his view that all areas of human consciousness can be accessible through the neo-Darwinian human model alone.

Translations

Breaking the Spell has been translated into several other languages, including:

See also

• Religious studies
• Evolutionary psychology of religion
• • Similar / related books: Religion Explained
  • Darwin's Cathedral
  • The End of Faith
  • The God Delusion
  • God is Not Great

References

1. ^ Dennett, Daniel C. (2006). Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-14-303833-7. Retrieved 2024-12-19.
2. Brown, A. (2006). "Beyond Belief". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2016-05-18. Retrieved 2016-12-18.
3. "Getting a Rational Grip on Religion" Archived June 8, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, Scientific American, December 25, 2005.
4. "The God Project" Archived December 25, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, The New Yorker, April 3, 2006.
5. Dyson, Freeman (June 22, 2006). "Religion from the Outside" (PDF). The New York Review of Books. 53 (11).
6. "The God Genome" Archived August 12, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, February 19, 2006.
7. "The God Meme" Archived March 13, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, The New Atlantis 12 (Spring 2006).
8. "The New Philistinism — the American Magazine". Archived from the original on 2013-04-21. Retrieved 2019-01-12.

External links

• "Breaking the Spell" panel, an audio recording and transcript of a discussion involving Daniel Dennett and Alister McGrath organized by the Royal Society of Arts. at archive.today (archived April 16, 2013)
• Interview with Dennett on Breaking the Spell, February 14, 2006, C-SPAN

Reviews

• David B. Hart, "Daniel Dennett Hunts the Snark" in First Things.
• George Johnson, "Getting a Rational Grip on Religion" in Scientific American.
• Leon Wieseltier, "The God Genome" in The New York Times.
  • Dennett's letter to The New York Times editor and Wieseltier's reply at the Wayback Machine (archived November 14, 2012)
• Adam Kirsch, "If Men Are From Mars, What's God" in The New York Sun.
• James Brookfield, "Dennett’s dangerous idea", World Socialist Website.
• Armin W. Geertz, "How Not to Do the Cognitive Science of Religion Today" (University of Aarhus seminar paper).
• Charles T. Rubin, "The God Meme" in The New Atlantis.

v t e Daniel Dennett
Concepts	Cartesian theater Greedy reductionism Heterophenomenology Intentional stance Intuition pump Memetics Multiple drafts model
Selected works	Brainstorms (1981) The Mind's I (1981) Elbow Room (1984) Consciousness Explained (1991) Darwin's Dangerous Idea (1995) Freedom Evolves (2003) Sweet Dreams (2005) Breaking the Spell (2006) From Bacteria to Bach and Back (2017)
Other	The Philosophical Lexicon New Atheism Universal Darwinism

• 2006 non-fiction books
• Analytic philosophy literature
• Books by Daniel Dennett
• Books critical of religion
• Cognitive science literature
• English-language books
• New Atheism